Just out of curiosity, have you tried with "continue" in the
route-map? It probably won't work, but give this a shot:

route-map OSPF2Default permit 10
 match ip address 1
 continue
!
route-map OSPF2Default permit 20
 match ip address 2
!


--
Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert

Mailto: [email protected]
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Live Assistance, Please visit: http://www.ipexpert.com/chat
eFax: +1.810.454.0130
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 15:40, Eric Holder <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks Joe...but, I tried that configuration before in my home lab on 3640 
> running enterprise plus 12.4.  I had some rack time this morning and tried 
> configuring the route-map as you recommended on a 3825 running Advance 
> Enterprise 12.4(24)T, thinking it might just be a 3640 problem.  However, the 
> results were the same on both:
>
> I configured the route map as follows:
>
> route-map OSPF2Default permit 10
>  match ip address 1
>  match ip address 2
>
> Results were either route and in show run it was configured like below even 
> though I typed as shown above:
>
> route-map OSPF2Default permit 10
>  match ip address 1 2
>
> HMM...interesting...Not a big deal because in the real world if you had 2 
> connections to your ISP, you would want to inject the default route into a 
> stub area.  However, if I get this question on the lab, then it is.
>
> ---- Joe Astorino <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> =============
> Give this a try:
>
> route-map OSPF2Default permit 10
>  match ip address 1
>  match ip address 2
>
> I believe that multiple matches under the same line is considered a boolean
> AND.  What you had before was on two separate entries in the route-map.
> Give it a try and let me know!
>
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 8:17 PM, Eric Holder <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> "As long as the 100.100.100.0/24 and 100.100.200.0/24 networks are in the
>> routing table, R8 should inject a 0/0 route to the Catalyst switches." The
>> problem is that it works with either route in the route, but the question
>> states "AND" which I took to mean both must be in table.  I can't get it to
>> work requiring both in the table.  The answer in the book works with either
>> route, but doesn't require both.  Answer:
>>
>> access-list 1 permit 100.100.100.0 0.0.0.255
>> access-list 1 permit 100.100.200.0 0.0.0.255
>>
>> route-map OSPF2Default permit 10
>>  match ip address 1
>>
>> router ospf 2
>>  default-information originate route-map OSPF2Default
>>
>> I've tried it a couple of different ways:
>> access-list 1 permit 100.100.100.0 0.0.0.255
>> access-list 2 permit 100.100.200.0 0.0.0.255
>>
>> route-map OSPF2Default permit 10
>>  match ip address 1
>> route-map OSPF2Default permit 20
>>  match ip address 2
>>
>> and
>>  route-map OSPF2Default permit 10
>>  match ip address 1 2
>>
>> But all of these work with either route in the routing table, but not both
>> as the question states "AND".   Once the route map sees a match it applies
>> the default route.
>>
>> Am I missing something?
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Joe Astorino CCIE #24347 (R&S)
> Sr. Technical Instructor - IPexpert
> Mailto: [email protected]
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
> eFax: +1.810.454.0130
>
> IPexpert is a premier provider of Classroom and Self-Study Cisco CCNA (R&S,
> Voice & Security), CCNP, CCVP, CCSP and CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service
> Provider) Certification Training with locations throughout the United
> States, Europe and Australia. Be sure to check out our online communities at
> www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to