Thank you, that is what I thought. Online study list +1 Boson 0.
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Brad Edgeworth <[email protected]> wrote: > If both sub interfaces are P2P; then nothing is required. If 1 is a P2P and > the other is not; then you'll need a map statement on the other end > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of marc abel > Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 7:38 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] inverse arp over ptp sub interfaces > > I am going through some review questions for my written and this one > has me perplexed, I am paraphrasing here. > > The question is: R1 has disabled inarp on s0/0.50 point-to-point what > would be needed to ping R3. > > The answers: Frame map on R1, Frame map on R3, or nothing is required > it would work. > > I chose nothing, since it is a point-to-point I thought that it will > send all traffic on that DLCI. Thier answer is that it needs a frame > map on R1. > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
