I'm not sure I understand the question entirely, but there are
fundamental differences in the commands here:

1) set ip next-hop <--- This will look at the next-hop address you
specify.  If that next-hop is in the routing-table, the packet is
policy routed to that next-hop.
2) set ip default next-hop <--- This will look at the destination IP
address in the header.  If you have a route to the destination in your
routing table the packet is NOT policy routed.  If you don't have a
route to the destination, then you are routed to the next-hop
specified.

The logic is different, and the two commands are looking at different
fields.  The first looks at next-hop and the second looks at the
destination IP address to make decisions.

HTH

On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Nadeem Rafi <[email protected]> wrote:
> Route-map Policy_routing
>  match ip address FROM_X_TO_Y permit 10
>  set ip next hope ABC
>  set ip next-hope verify-availability
>  set ip default next-hope XYZ
> how this will work? I know if cdp cannot verify reachability of next
> hope  then set ip next-hope ABC will not work. But why set ip default will
> work?
> Sorry for such basic question...
> Best Regards,
> Nadeem rafi
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>



-- 
Regards,

Joe Astorino CCIE #24347 (R&S)
Sr. Technical Instructor - IPexpert
Mailto: [email protected]
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
eFax: +1.810.454.0130

IPexpert is a premier provider of Classroom and Self-Study Cisco CCNA
(R&S, Voice & Security), CCNP, CCVP, CCSP and CCIE (R&S, Voice,
Security & Service Provider) Certification Training with locations
throughout the United States, Europe and Australia. Be sure to check
out our online communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities and our
public website at www.ipexpert.com
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to