I do plan to lab it in my next session. I wanted to ask while it was fresh on my mind as it just occurred to me today that this was a hole in my understanding of OSPF.
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Bryan Bartik <[email protected]> wrote: > Marc, > > Why don't you lab this? :) If you have two defaults, the shortest one is > chosen. Any time you use default routing or summarization the possibility > exists for less than optimal routing. I am sure there are several scenarios > you can come up with, but yes by turning a stubby area into a totally > stubby-area you can cause a "longer" path to be chosen. > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 6:48 PM, marc abel <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Suppose area 1 is attached to area 0 by two links. If it is a stub it >> would still route out the best link for things inside area 0 correct? >> But what happens when we make it totally stubby? Will we receive two >> default routes and load balance between them? Would the behavior be >> the same for totally NSSA? >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > -- > Bryan Bartik > CCIE #23707 (R&S, SP), CCNP > Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. > URL: http://www.IPexpert.com > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
