M
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:00:02
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 50, Issue 142
Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: GNS3 question (Mitch Peterson)
2. Re: GNS3 question (Bodnar, Edward)
3. Re: GNS3 question ([email protected])
4. Vol1 Lab2 Task 2.5 (FoosYou)
5. Re: Vol1 Lab2 task 2.4 (Patrice Ngassam)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:24:12 -0400
From: Mitch Peterson <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] GNS3 question
To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
It depends on what you're trying to do. If you want real switches and
virtual routers then you need one NIC per router Ethernet interface.
The problem I ran into was that I needed more NICs than I had slots in
my Dynamips server. I have two 4 port Ethernet cards plus the two
built in cards and I still didn't have enough. I was looking at maybe
buying some USB NICs, but I never got that far with it.
There's a pretty good tutorial at the dynagen site. You're looking
for the section called "Communicating with Real Networks."
http://dynagen.org/tutorial.htm
> I am looking to buy some switches and connect them to my GNS3 lab
> >environment. ?Can anybody kick me in the right direction? ?I am not sure if
> I >need more nic cards for my PC if I do how many do I need 1 per switch ?
>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:31:21 -0500
From: "Bodnar, Edward" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] GNS3 question
To: 'Mitch Peterson' <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<87ed2f20c514524781004420d30188cd41a8dc8...@usea-exch8.na.uis.unisys.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Thanks Ill take a look at it.
I think I have the general concept. Most likely I am going to try and get 4 4
port NIC cards. Just don't want to pony up the $ until I know it will work.
Ill check out that link
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mitch Peterson
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 11:24 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] GNS3 question
It depends on what you're trying to do. If you want real switches and
virtual routers then you need one NIC per router Ethernet interface.
The problem I ran into was that I needed more NICs than I had slots in
my Dynamips server. I have two 4 port Ethernet cards plus the two
built in cards and I still didn't have enough. I was looking at maybe
buying some USB NICs, but I never got that far with it.
There's a pretty good tutorial at the dynagen site. You're looking
for the section called "Communicating with Real Networks."
http://dynagen.org/tutorial.htm
> I am looking to buy some switches and connect them to my GNS3 lab
> >environment. ?Can anybody kick me in the right direction? ?I am not sure if
> I >need more nic cards for my PC if I do how many do I need 1 per switch ?
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:46:16 +0000
From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] GNS3 question
To: "Bodnar, Edward" <[email protected]>,
[email protected], "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<880085337-1269531939-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-11865693...@bda694.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>
Content-Type: text/plain
I was going to do 3x quad nics get some 3560s then adding it all up decided to
go 2 for 1 rack rental. I have a rack of 9 routers mostly 3640s and 2620xms and
a fr switch with a Single 3550 and 2x 2950s etc. I use that for core basic /
intermediate stuff then rent online for labs.
I broke down cost several times but here is short of it
3200 usd for 4x 3560s
3200 = over 1200 hours of rack time. That's not accounting for 2 for 1 deal
which *could* double that.....
Sooooooo if you had got 2 for 1 special and had 2400 hours that means you could
do about a session a day every day for a year......every day.........yea.
You don't own the equipment but you get switches 2811s a 3825s and no annoying
crap with gns3 deciding it don't want to work. I see these threads can't ping
from r4 to r6 or serial link not working etc etc.
I say forget all that. I use gns3 but it gets annoying not being able to do
certain things. Yes its free, but I guess I'm all about quality.
My 3cents.
-nick
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-----Original Message-----
From: "Bodnar, Edward" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 07:11:16
To: [email protected]<[email protected]>
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] GNS3 question
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:45:57 -0400
From: FoosYou <[email protected]>
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol1 Lab2 Task 2.5
To: CCIE OSL <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I have a couple questions about my lab last night concerning Vol1 Lab2 Task
2.5.
The task specifies that you must ensure all frames that travel across the
trunk should have a VLAN ID. After the lab I saw the solution was to use the
'vlan dot1q tag native' command but when I tried that command during the lab
I wasn't sure it was actually working. Whether or not the command was
applied it seemed I'd see the following output:
Sw1#sh int po12 sw | i Native
Trunking Native Mode VLAN: 1 (default)
Administrative Native VLAN tagging: enabled
After seeing that (and not being sure it would accomplish the task
correctly) I simply removed the native vlan from being allowed across the
trunk. Would that have been an acceptable solution as well and any ideas
about the command output discrepancy?
Thanks!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_rs/attachments/20100325/37104f89/attachment-0001.htm
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:47:16 +0100
From: Patrice Ngassam <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol1 Lab2 task 2.4
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I am glad you learnt that in a Lab. My experience with that was very painful, I
was upgrading a Datacenter and I tried to to connect the FE interface of 3745
to the fiber module on 6509. I could not figure it out during my change window
and I was blaming the wiring guy for wrong x-connect on the bix wall (A fluke
test was done, but I did not trust it). That's how I learnt I could not change
the speed on fiber SFP on 6509. No matter what, I will not try again on any
platform.
Question: I could not use etherchannel between 2 FE ports on 3745 and 6504. Is
that a hardware limitation on that platform (3745)? I tried it in my lab on
2811 and 3750 no problem, but for some reason I could not have my L3
etherchannel in an up/up state on 3745.
Patrice Ngassam
Ceritified Cisco CCNP, CCDP, CCIP
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:10:55 -0400
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol1 Lab2 task 2.4
Yea, just labbed it up on my own 3750's and no dice on setting the speed for
the gig SFP port.
Sw1(config-if)#speed ?
nonegotiate Do not negotiate speed
Which leaves it freaking out about the speed mismatch:
17w2d: FEC: pagp_switch_agc_compatable: comparing GC values of Gi1/0/4 Fa1/0/47
flag = 1 1
17w2d: FEC: pagp_switch_port_attrib_diff: compare PAgP modes for Gi1/0/4
17w2d: FEC: pagp_switch_port_attrib_diff: Gi1/0/4 Fa1/0/47 same
17w2d: FEC: pagp_switch_agc_compatable: EC - attrib incompatable for Gi1/0/4;
speed of Gi1/0/4 is 1000M, Fa1/0/47 is 100M
17w2d: FEC: pagp_switch_choose_unique: Gi1/0/4, port Fa1/0/47 in agport Po12 is
incompatable
So where does that leave me for what this task requires? Disable the gig port?
Also, should we also be worried that Cisco can't spell 'incompatible' ?
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 17:58, FoosYou <[email protected]> wrote:
> I assumed you couldn't based on them needing to be the same speed and
> duplex. Also assumed that by speed they meant the hardware and not the
> 'speed' command. Guess I'll be seeing if those bundle together!
You assumed well. Now, I must state one thing here. The behavior
depending on the "speed" command is hardware-based. On 3560s, you
can't change speed of SFP GigE ports. On some platforms you can and on
those platforms, given everything else matches, you can bundle them in
EC.
[ We need to clarify this lab, though. Again, nice catch. ]
--
Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
YES! We include 400 hours of REAL rack
time with our Blended Learning Solution!
Mailto: [email protected]
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
_________________________________________________________________
D?couvrez comment SURFER DISCRETEMENT sur un site de rencontres !
http://clk.atdmt.com/FRM/go/206608211/direct/01/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_rs/attachments/20100325/7904e5c0/attachment-0001.htm
End of CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 50, Issue 142
****************************************
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
