CBWFQ is not supported on subinterfaces, (at least not directly). That's true, however, don't forget about nested policy-maps :) You can use a parent policy-map (w/ shaping enabled!) that references a child policy-map (CBWFQ) matching your traffic.
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 2:05 PM, nicholas golden <[email protected]>wrote: > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_0t/12_0t5/feature/guide/cbwfq.html > > > It says right there, "Class Based WFQ is not supported on sub interfaces". > > I used google and put "class based weighted fair queuing on sub interface" > and that's what showed up. > > I did not know that either, so I learned something. :) > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Mustafa Yadav <[email protected]> > *To:* ccie_rs <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Tue, April 27, 2010 10:42:44 AM > *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_RS] class based wfq > > Hi All > > > I have used a very basic MQC config as shown below and once I try to > apply it to one of subinterfaces it gave an error cbwfq can not be applied > to subinterfaces.How it understand that my config is cbwfq?I > > > > R5#sh policy-map interface serial 0/0 > > Serial0/0 > > Service-policy output: smtp > > Class-map: smtp (match-all) > 1 packets, 48 bytes > 5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps > Match: access-group name smtp > Queueing > Output Queue: Conversation 265 > Bandwidth 256 (kbps)Max Threshold 64 (packets) > (pkts matched/bytes matched) 1/48 > (depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0 > > Class-map: class-default (match-any) > 219 packets, 13446 bytes > 5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps > Match: any > > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
