What Robert just said (more ways the better) is absolutely true, and
something we preach 100% to our students...we just happened to not run
into that particular option in the workbook...hmmmmm I smell a good
task coming down the road whereby you must prefer the backdoor IGP
link but can NOT alter AD to do so : )  I love it!

On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 4:34 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> Very interesting way. I saw that option and went "hmmmmm?" but never pursued 
> it. Now ill keep it mind.
>
> -nick
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Simmons <[email protected]>
> Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 16:26:50
> To: Joe Astorino<[email protected]>
> Cc: CCIE OSL<[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] eBGP Loopback Peering
>
> The more ways you have to do something the better!
>
> Thanks for the quick (as always) response Joe.
>
> -Rob
>
> On May 13, 2010, at 4:18 PM, Joe Astorino wrote:
>
>> Any alternative way that doesn't break the rules is a good one to
>> know!  There is really no reason I can give you as to why we never
>> used that particular command other than that the lab author did not
>> find it all that interesting or overly important.  The other thing you
>> could do is just not advertise the loopback into BGP at the same time
>> as your IGP...just don't use the network command at all!
>>
>> I don't see why the BGP backdoor option could not be used to
>> accomplish what you are saying. nice!
>>
>> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Robert Simmons <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Ipexperts,
>>>
>>> In various labs, I've noticed that you guys present a scenario where you 
>>> have two eBGP nodes peering via a loopback that is being advertised via an 
>>> IGP. Obviously, this is going to cause the neighbor to "flap" since the 
>>> eBGP AD 20 metric will supersede any of the default IGP metrics. The two 
>>> techniques I've seen you guys use throughout your workbooks are to either 
>>> filter the loopback via route-map on the neighbor or playing around with 
>>> the distances to make the IGP loopback preferable. The technique I always 
>>> use and to me seems much simpler is just using the network statement with 
>>> the keyword "backdoor" for the peer's loopback address. I haven't seen you 
>>> use this technique and I'm wondering if there is a reason why? Obviously, 
>>> if you have certain restrictions in a particular lab I wouldn't use it but, 
>>> if there aren't any shouldn't this be a valid method as well?
>>>
>>> I'm just wondering if there is some downside that I'm not seeing.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> -Rob
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Joe Astorino - CCIE #24347
>> Sr. Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>> Mailto: [email protected]
>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
>> Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
>> eFax: +1.810.454.0130
>>
>> IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on
>> Demand, Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for
>> the Cisco CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider)
>> certification(s) with training locations throughout the United States,
>> Europe, South Asia and Australia. Be sure to visit our online
>> communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at
>> www.ipexpert.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>



-- 
Regards,



Joe Astorino - CCIE #24347
Sr. Technical Instructor - IPexpert
Mailto: [email protected]
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
eFax: +1.810.454.0130

IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on
Demand, Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for
the Cisco CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider)
certification(s) with training locations throughout the United States,
Europe, South Asia and Australia. Be sure to visit our online
communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at
www.ipexpert.com
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to