Can you also post a Show ip route? Also your frame relay interface configs would be helpful too.
I think that it is showing them as untagged because MPLS sees them as a directly connected network. On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:48 PM, jason lau <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am watching the Video and pratise it in GNS3, in this MPLS L3 VPN > Configuration lab, R2, R4, R5 and R6 are running OSPF type > Point-to-Multipoint, it generates host route and send it to neighbor, when > further configured MPLS, I see something wrong here. > > For example, R2 has serial interface IP 100.100.100.2/24 configured, in > OSPF world, R6 receives a host route 100.100.100.2/32, nothing is wrong > untill MPLS is enabled. R6 assigns a lable to host route 100.100.100.2/32and > advertise it. But since R2 doesn't have this host route in its routing > table, it only has 100.100.100.2/24 as Connected route, so R6 will not > recevie lable for 100.100.100.2/32 from R2, in the LFIB, the Outgoing > Lable is untagged: > > R6#sh mpls forwarding-table > Local Outgoing Prefix Bytes tag Outgoing Next Hop > tag tag or VC or Tunnel Id switched interface > 16 Untagged 100.100.100.5/32 0 Se1/0 100.100.100.5 > 17 Untagged 100.100.100.2/32 0 Se1/0 100.100.100.2 > 18 Pop tag 5.5.5.5/32 0 Se1/0 100.100.100.5 > 19 Pop tag 2.2.2.2/32 0 Se1/0 100.100.100.2 > 20 Untagged 100.100.100.4/32 0 Se1/0 100.100.100.4 > 21 Pop tag 4.4.4.4/32 0 Se1/0 100.100.100.4 > R6# > > same thing for all other host routes from spoke routers. I think this will > cause problem for L3 VPN. > > Any ideal? > > Thanks > > > Jason > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
