Hi, I've just scheduled R&S sessions for the entire week after the next without any problems.
Regards, Stefan -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von [email protected] Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. August 2010 20:14 An: [email protected] Betreff: CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 55, Issue 51 Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [email protected] You can reach the person managing the list at [email protected] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Proctor Labs R+S (marc abel) 2. Re: Proctor Labs R+S (Jimmy Larsson) 3. Re: Proctor Labs R+S (Di Bias, Steve) 4. Re: Points ? (Marko Milivojevic) 5. Re: FR Traffic Shaping Clarification (Tyson Scott) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:33:30 -0500 From: marc abel <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Proctor Labs R+S Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" I've had a harder and harder time scheduling labs lately. Right now there are essentially no R+S session available for the next 2 weeks. Is this an anomoly or is it time for proctor labs to think about adding a few more racks? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </archives/ccie_rs/attachments/20100817/e664f69a/attachment-0001.html> ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 18:47:07 +0200 From: Jimmy Larsson <[email protected]> To: OSL Routing and Switching <[email protected]>, OSL Security <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Proctor Labs R+S Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" I am in the same situation for security racks. I am in Europe so the most convenient slots are 00:00 and 08:00 (EST) and Ive found now that it it a lot more busy now than under the entire spring. It is quite frustrating. Anyone from ipexpert who has a comment on this? Wayne? /Jimmy 2010/8/17 marc abel <[email protected]> > I've had a harder and harder time scheduling labs lately. Right now there > are essentially no R+S session available for the next 2 weeks. Is this an > anomoly or is it time for proctor labs to think about adding a few more > racks? > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > -- ------- Jimmy Larsson Ryavagen 173 s-26030 Vallakra Sweden http://blogg.kvistofta.nu ------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </archives/ccie_rs/attachments/20100817/b126ec21/attachment-0001.html> ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:51:55 -0400 From: "Di Bias, Steve" <[email protected]> To: Jimmy Larsson <[email protected]>, OSL Routing and Switching <[email protected]>, OSL Security <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Proctor Labs R+S Message-ID: <2fe030039b8ad14eb4373ca25779c63e90f0e6e...@corp-exvs01.corp.uhsinc.biz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Uh oh, I was just getting ready to start using Proctor Labs racks as well Thank you, Steve Di Bias Network Engineer - Information Systems Valley Health System - Las Vegas Office - 702- 369-7594 Cell - 702-241-1801 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> ________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jimmy Larsson Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 9:47 AM To: OSL Routing and Switching; OSL Security Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Proctor Labs R+S I am in the same situation for security racks. I am in Europe so the most convenient slots are 00:00 and 08:00 (EST) and Ive found now that it it a lot more busy now than under the entire spring. It is quite frustrating. Anyone from ipexpert who has a comment on this? Wayne? /Jimmy 2010/8/17 marc abel <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> I've had a harder and harder time scheduling labs lately. Right now there are essentially no R+S session available for the next 2 weeks. Is this an anomoly or is it time for proctor labs to think about adding a few more racks? _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com> -- ------- Jimmy Larsson Ryavagen 173 s-26030 Vallakra Sweden http://blogg.kvistofta.nu ------- UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If this was sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </archives/ccie_rs/attachments/20100817/509ded54/attachment-0001.html> ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:02:30 +0200 From: Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> To: Quentin Huberty <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Points ? Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hello, As someone else mentioned, this kind of information is covered by the NDA. All I can say is not to go to the lab without understanding those technologies... at least a little bit. -- Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture Mailto: [email protected] Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/ ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:13:26 -0400 From: "Tyson Scott" <[email protected]> To: "'Roy Shaver'" <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] FR Traffic Shaping Clarification Message-ID: <016101cb3e37$e493dc90$adbb95...@com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" *4 is approximate. I would stick with the first. Access Rate (AR) = Bc + Be Regards, Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP Managing Partner / Sr. Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Mailto: [email protected] Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208 Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat eFax: +1.810.454.0130 IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand, Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider) certification(s) with training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com/> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Roy Shaver Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 7:03 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] FR Traffic Shaping Clarification I understand Tc=Bc/CIR which makes perfect sense. I have found in my studies that confuse what Be should be. For example if I have a 64k CIR and am allowed to burst to 256k and you need to set the configuration such that Tc equals 200ms or 1/5Sec. And as I understand Bc + Be = Burst then the math should be as follows: Tc = Bc / CIR CIR = 64000 Tc = 200ms or 1/5 Bc = 64000/5 = 12800 So all straight forward so far... Now to figure Be. (Bc + Be) * 5 = 256000 (12800 + Be) * 5 = 256000 Some math I couldn't figure out how to write in the e-mail.... Be = 38400 Thus (12800 + 38400) * 5 = 256000 Now here is were the confusion sets in.... Some examples I have read and seen people are saying since 256k is 4 time 64k then multiply Bc times 4 and you have Be. But when I do that the math works out that you would be bursting to 320k not 256k. (12800 + 51200) * 5 = 320000 So the question is, Do you add Bc to Be to calculate the burst or do you do as some of the examples I have seen do and multiple it by whatever. I was sure I was doing it right until I saw some examples do it differently. Thanks, Roy S. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </archives/ccie_rs/attachments/20100817/e5bc02b3/attachment.html> End of CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 55, Issue 51 *************************************** _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
