I agree that it's a better solution, but does storm control meet the stated requirement in your opinion?
Thanks, Josh On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Tyson Scott <[email protected]> wrote: > Good idea. But what is the difference between using storm control and > multicast rate-limit on the L3 interface? I am assuming that is the actual > answer. > > > > Does storm control rate-limit or drop traffic? > > > > I think you would find that storm-control will drop all traffic anytime the > level of traffic being received exceeded 2MB so probably not what you want > to do. > > > > Regards, > > > > Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP > > Managing Partner / Sr. Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. > > Mailto: [email protected] > > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208 > > Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat > > eFax: +1.810.454.0130 > > > > IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand, > Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco > CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider) certification(s) with > training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and > Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at > www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Joshua Yost > *Sent:* Tuesday, August 17, 2010 8:23 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_RS] Lab 24 Task 17 > > > > *Admins want to limit multicast sources coming in through BB2 to not > exceed 2Mbps of throughput. Do not use CAR or MQC.* > > Could I use storm control multicast on BB2's switchport to accomplish this > or did I have to much meth in my Wheaties this morning? >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
