A long waited forum can do this job. On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Tyson Scott <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well... we are already in the process of getting a resource like this up > and running. We are creating a new resource on our website that will be > like a technical knowledge base. We will be compiling it to be used as a > reference that can be referred to based on topic. We are first starting by > organizing our technical blogs and white papers. There are several blogs > that we have on test strategy and recommended study links so as we finish > compiling the resources answers from us on things like this will be in a > central resource. I am not sure on exact dates but this was already started > either late last week or early this week. It is funny that you bring it up. > > > > What you ask for below is just a small part of what we will have in it. > > > > Regards, > > > > Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP > > Managing Partner / Sr. Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. > > Mailto: [email protected] > > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208 > > Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat > > eFax: +1.810.454.0130 > > > > IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand, > Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco > CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider) certification(s) with > training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and > Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at > www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com > > > > *From:* Jigar K Dave [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Thursday, August 19, 2010 10:03 PM > *To:* OSL Routing and Switching; [email protected] > *Cc:* [email protected]; Marko Milivojevic > *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] A General Question > > > > Hello Group, > > Just a small suggestion from my side, we can see that some questions are > repetitive like > > 1. what is the best way to prepare for lab > 2. what books to refer > 3. strategy for lab > 4. how to split time in lab for troubleshooting and configuration > 5. some technical questions on network and security technologies > > we can see it is repeated once every new member joins this group. could we > have a way to redirect him in some older mail/archive reference. > otherwise what happened unnecessarily one mail chain is elongate though the > answer is known to every old members. I appreciate its good to answers > everyone's query but by this way we can shape the things.(this applies to > each group like RS, Security, storage, wireless etc.) > > guys your thoughts on this > > Tyson - need your comments also. > > sorry - its a general thing, plz don't take it personally. I am not > pointing this to anyone. > > > Thanks, > Jigar > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 5:35 AM, Matt Hill <[email protected]> wrote: > > Gaurav wins! > > Unless it says "dont do it this way" you can. Just be aware of what > one way of doing something will break elsewhere in the network. > > Which is why (as Gaurav says) you must know multiple ways of doing things. > > Cheers, > Matt > > CCIE #22386 > CCSI #31207 > > > On 20 August 2010 00:52, GAURAV MADAN <[email protected]> wrote: > > Mate .. > > > > First .. Lemme tell u that if u know of more than one way of doing > > things .. U r on track :) It certainly helps in exam .. > > Coming to your point .. Read the instructions very very carefully .. > > They will answer your query most of times .. In case u still have > > doubt .. Proctor is there to help you .. Go and tell that u know of > > these these ways to perform the task .. If he thinks that he shd > > answer your query .. he will definitely do .. > > If he doesn't .. there is something hidden in question and try > > figuring that out .. > > > > Remember CCIE is not the exam to just do the task .. It is exam to do > > task ; the way they want :) > > > > Just my 2 cents .. > > > > Good Luck ! > > > > Gaurav Madan > > CCIE # 23863 > > > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Cody Cook <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I have a question for everyone. I'm using a variety of vendors' > >> workbooks to work on labs and have run across something that has been > >> bothering me. Not so much a question about any lab but more of a > >> general thing. If the lab you are working on doesn't expressly forbid > >> a solution, is it okay to use it? More specifically the use of > >> tunnels to solve some issues. > >> > >> Here is an example of what I mean. You have two routers that you are > >> told to set up as EBGP peers. Router 1 (R1) is in AS 100 and router 2 > >> (R2) is in AS 200. Let's assume that they are connected to a common > >> vlan using f0/1. R1 has an ip of 10.0.0.1/24 with a secondary ip of > >> 10.1.1.1/24. R1 has an ip of 10.1.1.2/24 with a secondary ip of > >> 10.0.0.2/24. You are told to set up the peering without using the > >> secondary addresses. > >> > >> R1 > >> int f0/1 > >> ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0 > >> ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 secondary > >> > >> R2 > >> int f0/1 > >> ip address 10.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 > >> ip address 10.0.0.2 255.255.255.0 secondary > >> > >> One way to do this would be to set your neighbor statements within BGP > >> to point to each of the primary addresses. In order to get the peer > >> to come up you will need to add "update-source f0/1" for one of the > >> neighbor statements. > >> > >> R1 > >> router bgp 100 > >> neighbor 10.1.1.2 remote-as 200 > >> neighbor 10.1.1.2 update-source f0/1 > >> > >> R2 > >> router bgp 200 > >> neighbor 10.0.0.1 remote-as 100 > >> > >> This works well. Another way would be create a tunnel, assign it some > >> addresses and set the peering relationship through it. While not the > >> best solution, it would work. Probably not a good example, but it one > >> that comes to mind. > >> > >> So I guess the gist of my question is this, if for some reason you > >> can't get something to work for you and for what ever reason you can't > >> come up with another solution. In the example above, say for whatever > >> reason you just didn't think of using update-source on one of the ends > >> and the tunnel was the only way you could get it to work, would this > >> be acceptable in the lab. While obviously not the optimal solution, > >> it does work and it doesn't violate any of the rules of the scenario. > >> Is it cool to use something like this in the lab? > >> > >> Like I said, not a big deal, just something that's been bugging me. I > >> have had a couple of instances where I have noticed that you could > >> come up with a similar soluton. Hopefully hs makes sense. > >> > >> Thanks. > >> Cody > >> _______________________________________________ > >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > please visit www.ipexpert.com > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > > -- > Thanks, > Jigar Dave > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
