Just curious - are you using real switches, or Dynamips?

--
Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert

FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture

Mailto: [email protected]
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/

On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 19:29, Baldwin, Patrick A.
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks for the reply Jay, CAT4 is the root per task 3.5.  With CAT4 as the
> root, I am not sure why this should not work as is.
>
>
>
> Patrick A. Baldwin (Alex)
> Network Engineering
> Colsa Corp., HOSC Contract
> NASA , Marshall Space Flight Center
> (Office: (256) 544-2089
> ÊFax: (256) 544-8629
> *E-mail: [email protected]
>
>
>
> From: Jay Taylor [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 2:20 PM
> To: Baldwin, Patrick A.
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Volume 1 Task 3.8
>
>
>
> If I remember correctly it depends on which switch ends up being the root in
> your topology. In at least 1 config of that lab I added the following on
> Cat2 to make things work as expected:
>
> int ra fa0/21-22
> span mst 0 cost 100000
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Baldwin, Patrick A. <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Afternoon,
>
>
>
> Performing Task 3.8 of Volume 1, I cannot duplicate the results in the DSG
>
>
>
> If the links between Cat1 and Cat4 fail, the backup path should be the
> highest port number to cat3.  if this link fails, the highest port number to
> cat2 should come next in line.  if changes are made on cat1, cat1 is only
> allowed one interface command.
>
>
>
> This task is to teach us to use the port-priority command to manipulate
> spanning-tree, once all interfaces have a cost of 200000, manipulating the
> port priority on cat2 port f1/0/24 in my case should cause that port to be
> used by cat1.
>
>
>
>
>
> Cat2-MST(config-if)# spanning-tree mst 0 port-priority 64
>
> Cat2-MST(config-if)#^Z
>
> Cat2-MST#sh span
>
> 1d17h: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console
>
> Cat2-MST#sh span int f1/0/24
>
>
>
> Mst Instance        Role Sts Cost      Prio.Nbr Type
>
> ------------------- ---- --- --------- --------
> --------------------------------
>
> MST0                Desg FWD 200000     64.26   P2p
>
>
>
>
>
> Cat1-MST(config-if-range)#do sh span
>
>
>
> MST0
>
>   Spanning tree enabled protocol mstp
>
>   Root ID    Priority    24576
>
>              Address     001a.a1fc.dc00
>
>              Cost        0
>
>              Port        23 (FastEthernet1/0/21)
>
>              Hello Time   3 sec  Max Age 15 sec  Forward Delay 15 sec
>
>
>
>   Bridge ID  Priority    32768  (priority 32768 sys-id-ext 0)
>
>              Address     001b.2bde.c000
>
>              Hello Time   2 sec  Max Age 20 sec  Forward Delay 15 sec
>
>
>
> Interface           Role Sts Cost      Prio.Nbr Type
>
> ------------------- ---- --- --------- --------
> --------------------------------
>
> Fa1/0/1             Desg FWD 200000    128.3    P2p
>
> Fa1/0/2             Desg FWD 200000    128.4    P2p
>
> Fa1/0/4             Desg FWD 200000    128.6    P2p
>
> Fa1/0/5             Desg FWD 200000    128.7    P2p
>
> Fa1/0/11            Desg FWD 200000    128.13   P2p
>
> Fa1/0/13            Desg FWD 200000    128.15   P2p
>
> Fa1/0/14            Desg FWD 200000    128.16   P2p
>
> Fa1/0/15            Desg FWD 200000    128.17   P2p
>
> Fa1/0/16            Desg FWD 200000    128.18   P2p
>
> Fa1/0/18            Desg FWD 200000    128.20   P2p
>
> Fa1/0/21            Root FWD 200000    128.23   P2p
>
> Fa1/0/23            Altn BLK 200000    128.25   P2p
>
> Fa1/0/24            Altn BLK 200000    128.26   P2p
>
>
>
> Port f1/0/24 should be Root FWD, but is still blocking??  Any idea what I
> did wrong or is this a bug?  I have verified with CDP that CAT1 and CAT2 are
> connected on f1/0/24.
>
>
>
>
>
> Patrick A. Baldwin (Alex)
> Network Engineering
> Colsa Corp., HOSC Contract
> NASA , Marshall Space Flight Center
> (Office: (256) 544-2089
> ÊFax: (256) 544-8629
> *E-mail: [email protected]
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to