Your last one on the money. If you have a dialup/isdn/dsl or some other kind of temporary or backup link having a peer neighbour route can cause packets to be sent to a next hop which does not exist.
Cheers, Matt CCIE #22386 CCSI #31207 On 10 November 2010 05:03, Bojan Zivancevic <[email protected]> wrote: > I was doing a little deeper analysis of the peer neighbor-route feature, and > just could not see why would I ever disable that feature. > > > > Do you know any situation where that would be appropriate? > > > > Because, if we have different networks on both sides of ppp link, we need it > of course to make routing possible. It does not matter if we are using > unnunmbered or not in this case. > > > > Or, if we are using unnunmbered on two routers with the same (say) ethernet > networks on the far sides... Again, I think we must use it because routers > somehow must distinguish ethernet networks from /32 ppp link addresses. > > > > Maybe there can be an issue when using IGP over ppp unnumbered, because of > these peer routes showing up as connected... I admit I still did not test > this situation fully... > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Bojan Zivancevic > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
