That still doesn't answer if we should match the diagram they provide or the 
table they provide if there are conflicts. Unless this is a typo in the 
IPexpert material. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 16, 2010, at 5:07 PM, "Tyson Scott" <[email protected]> wrote:

> All that matters is results. This extra configuration isn't something you 
> need to be concerned with.
> 
>  
> 
> Regards,
> 
>  
> 
> Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP
> 
> Managing Partner / Sr. Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
> 
> Mailto: [email protected]
> 
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208
> 
> Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
> 
> eFax: +1.810.454.0130
> 
>  
> 
> IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand, 
> Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco CCIE 
> (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider) certification(s) with training 
> locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and Australia. Be 
> sure to visit our online communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities and our 
> public website at www.ipexpert.com
> 
>  
> 
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jay Taylor
> Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 8:45 AM
> To: CCIE OSL
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Fwd: Vol3 Lab10 Task1.1
> 
>  
> 
> Any thoughts on this?
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Jay Taylor <[email protected]>
> Date: Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 10:16 AM
> Subject: Vol3 Lab10 Task1.1
> To: CCIE OSL <[email protected]>
> 
> 
> When making the corrections in task1.1 some of the routers have dot1q 
> configured and others do not. Should we be making the switch configuration 
> based on what the router config to make it work or modify both to match the 
> IPv4 address table at the beginning of the lab?
> 
> Example: R7 and R9 are configured for dot1q but the address table lacks the 
> subinterfaces.
> 
> 
>  
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to