Hi,

Redistribution is something that I find very messy.  Can I get the URL to
marko's vlecture on it please?  Thanks.

Regards,
Samir.

On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 3:46 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to
>        [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        [email protected]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        [email protected]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: Lab Equipment (Tyson Scott)
>   2. Re: Marko's Routing Protocol Redistribution vLecture (Jay Taylor)
>   3. Re: Marko's Routing Protocol Redistribution vLecture (David Betz)
>   4. Re: Marko's Routing Protocol Redistribution vLecture
>      (Marko Milivojevic)
>   5. Re: Marko's Routing Protocol Redistribution vLecture (David Betz)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 10:41:07 -0500
> From: "Tyson Scott" <[email protected]>
> To: "'Mesikoo Kamali'" <[email protected]>,        <
> [email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Lab Equipment
> Message-ID: <011001cb9300$81470770$83d516...@com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> I believe the 2691's support 12.4(15)T.  If that is the case then the
> equipment that you have should support 99% of what we do in our workbooks.
>
> Regards,
> ?
> Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP
> Managing Partner / Sr. Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
> Mailto: [email protected]
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208
> Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
> eFax: +1.810.454.0130
>
> IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand,
> Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco
> CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider) certification(s) with
> training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and
> Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at
> www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mesikoo Kamali
> Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 7:18 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Lab Equipment
>
> Hello,
>
>  I built a lab out of some random gear collected over the past couple of
> years and I was hoping to get your opinions on it. will this lab cut it  or
> will I have to start replacing equipment when I get further in to the
> workbooks?
>
>
> Here is the device list based on the ipexpert r/s 4.0 connectivity diagram.
>
> 2x Catalyst 3550s
> 2x Catalyst 3560s
>
> R1 - C2691
> R2 - C2691
> R4 - C2691
> R5 - C3725
> R6 - C3725
> R7 - C2651xm
> R8 - C2651xm
> R9 - C3725
> All the BB routers are C2610s
>
>
> I finally managed to leave work and start studying full time for the ccie
> r/s track. first time poster here, go easy on me :)
>
> Thank you,
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 10:57:43 -0500
> From: Jay Taylor <[email protected]>
> To: David Betz <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Marko's Routing Protocol Redistribution
>        vLecture
> Message-ID:
>        <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>
> To me, the wording of 'Do not use any routefiltering ACLs' part means don't
> call them directly in a distribute or offset list.
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:20 AM, David Betz <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I was reading the first lab in the Cisco Press CCIE R&S Practice Lab book
> > the other day and saw the following in the IGP section, EIGRP
> sub-section:
> >
> > Ensure that R4 does not install any of the EIGRP Loopback routes from any
> > of the switches into its routing table;
> > as such these routes should also not be present in the OSPF network post
> > redistribution. Do not use any routefiltering ACLs, prefix lists, or
> admin
> > distance manipulation to achieve this, and perform configuration only on
> > R4. (3 points)
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Combatant 101 <[email protected]
> >wrote:
> >
> >>  Hi Guys / Marko,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I find Marko?s vLecture on Routing Protocol Redistribution the most time
> >> efficient and easy method for IGP Redistribution.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> What I would like to know is, has Cisco ever stated in the lab for IGP
> >> Redistribution (specifically) that route-maps and / or tags are not
> >> permitted?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Combatant101
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> http://myitgeekblog.wordpress.com/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please
> >> visit www.ipexpert.com
> >>
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> > visit www.ipexpert.com
> >
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: </archives/ccie_rs/attachments/20101203/7b2dbf79/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 10:09:41 -0600
> From: David Betz <[email protected]>
> To: Jay Taylor <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Marko's Routing Protocol Redistribution
>        vLecture
> Message-ID:
>        
> <[email protected]<aanlktiky8wfm2gtlud_x9okjvrpm-lrt21--w5c_1j%[email protected]>
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>
> How would you do this in a route-map without an ACL?  When I read that part
> of the lab, I was like.... uhh.... what?
>
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Jay Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > To me, the wording of 'Do not use any routefiltering ACLs' part means
> don't
> > call them directly in a distribute or offset list.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:20 AM, David Betz <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> I was reading the first lab in the Cisco Press CCIE R&S Practice Lab
> book
> >> the other day and saw the following in the IGP section, EIGRP
> sub-section:
> >>
> >> Ensure that R4 does not install any of the EIGRP Loopback routes from
> any
> >> of the switches into its routing table;
> >> as such these routes should also not be present in the OSPF network post
> >> redistribution. Do not use any routefiltering ACLs, prefix lists, or
> admin
> >> distance manipulation to achieve this, and perform configuration only on
> >> R4. (3 points)
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Combatant 101 <[email protected]
> >wrote:
> >>
> >>>  Hi Guys / Marko,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I find Marko?s vLecture on Routing Protocol Redistribution the most
> time
> >>> efficient and easy method for IGP Redistribution.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> What I would like to know is, has Cisco ever stated in the lab for IGP
> >>> Redistribution (specifically) that route-maps and / or tags are not
> >>> permitted?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Combatant101
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> http://myitgeekblog.wordpress.com/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please
> >>> visit www.ipexpert.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please
> >> visit www.ipexpert.com
> >>
> >>
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: </archives/ccie_rs/attachments/20101203/328c8ee4/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 16:33:26 +0000
> From: Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]>
> To: David Betz <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Marko's Routing Protocol Redistribution
>        vLecture
> Message-ID:
>        <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Using tags :-)
>
> --
> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>
> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
>
> Mailto: [email protected]
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
>
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 16:09, David Betz <[email protected]> wrote:
> > How would you do this in a route-map without an ACL? ?When I read that
> part
> > of the lab, I was like.... uhh.... what?
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Jay Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> To me, the wording of 'Do not use any routefiltering ACLs' part means
> >> don't call them directly in a distribute or offset list.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:20 AM, David Betz <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I was reading the first lab in the Cisco Press CCIE R&S Practice Lab
> book
> >>> the other day and saw the following in the IGP section, EIGRP
> sub-section:
> >>> Ensure that R4 does not install any of the EIGRP Loopback routes from
> any
> >>> of the switches into its routing table;
> >>> as such these routes should also not be present in the OSPF network
> post
> >>> redistribution. Do not use any routefiltering ACLs, prefix lists, or
> admin
> >>> distance manipulation to achieve this, and perform configuration only
> on
> >>> R4. (3 points)
> >>> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Combatant 101 <[email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Guys / Marko,
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I find Marko?s vLecture on Routing Protocol Redistribution the most
> time
> >>>> efficient and easy method for IGP Redistribution.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> What I would like to know is, has Cisco ever stated in the lab for IGP
> >>>> Redistribution (specifically) that route-maps and / or tags are not
> >>>> permitted?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Combatant101
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> http://myitgeekblog.wordpress.com/
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> >>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please
> >>> visit www.ipexpert.com
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> > visit www.ipexpert.com
> >
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 10:46:32 -0600
> From: David Betz <[email protected]>
> To: Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Marko's Routing Protocol Redistribution
>        vLecture
> Message-ID:
>        
> <[email protected]<aanlktikwmgzktose_%[email protected]>
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>
> Well, this would be to apply the tags. For that I would need an
> access-list,
> yes?  This is definitely where I would have to ask the Proctor to clarify
> what it means, because I think I'm reading it differently than you.
>
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]
> >wrote:
>
> > Using tags :-)
> >
> > --
> > Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> > Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
> >
> > FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
> >
> > Mailto: [email protected]
> > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> > Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 16:09, David Betz <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > How would you do this in a route-map without an ACL?  When I read that
> > part
> > > of the lab, I was like.... uhh.... what?
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Jay Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> To me, the wording of 'Do not use any routefiltering ACLs' part means
> > >> don't call them directly in a distribute or offset list.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:20 AM, David Betz <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> I was reading the first lab in the Cisco Press CCIE R&S Practice Lab
> > book
> > >>> the other day and saw the following in the IGP section, EIGRP
> > sub-section:
> > >>> Ensure that R4 does not install any of the EIGRP Loopback routes from
> > any
> > >>> of the switches into its routing table;
> > >>> as such these routes should also not be present in the OSPF network
> > post
> > >>> redistribution. Do not use any routefiltering ACLs, prefix lists, or
> > admin
> > >>> distance manipulation to achieve this, and perform configuration only
> > on
> > >>> R4. (3 points)
> > >>> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Combatant 101 <
> [email protected]>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Hi Guys / Marko,
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I find Marko?s vLecture on Routing Protocol Redistribution the most
> > time
> > >>>> efficient and easy method for IGP Redistribution.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> What I would like to know is, has Cisco ever stated in the lab for
> IGP
> > >>>> Redistribution (specifically) that route-maps and / or tags are not
> > >>>> permitted?
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Combatant101
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> http://myitgeekblog.wordpress.com/
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> > >>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> > please
> > >>> visit www.ipexpert.com
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please
> > > visit www.ipexpert.com
> > >
> > >
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: </archives/ccie_rs/attachments/20101203/e2b987d1/attachment.html>
>
> End of CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 59, Issue 9
> **************************************
>



-- 
Samir Idris
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to