I hope it helps.  Before having doing that blog it often was an area of
confusion for myself as well.  The numbers never made sense to me.

 

Regards,

 

Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP

Managing Partner / Sr. Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.

Mailto:  <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208

Live Assistance, Please visit:  <http://www.ipexpert.com/chat>
www.ipexpert.com/chat

eFax: +1.810.454.0130

 

IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand,
Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco
CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider) certification(s) with
training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and
Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at
<http://www.ipexpert.com/communities> www.ipexpert.com/communities and our
public website at  <http://www.ipexpert.com/> www.ipexpert.com

 

From: amit chopra [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 2:00 PM
To: Tyson Scott
Cc: Di Bias, Steve; [email protected];
[email protected]; Marko Milivojevic
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] EIGRP unequal cost load

 

Yes I have readed your blog now and save into my OneNote document. Thanks
Tyson

On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Tyson Scott <[email protected]> wrote:

If you use the formula's shown on the blog I gave the link below for you
shouldn't have any problems.  These are exact and never cause me problems.

 

Regards,

 

Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP

Managing Partner / Sr. Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.

Mailto: [email protected]

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208

Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat

eFax: +1.810.454.0130

 

IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand,
Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco
CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider) certification(s) with
training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and
Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at
www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com
<http://www.ipexpert.com/> 

 

From: amit chopra [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 1:49 PM
To: Tyson Scott
Cc: Di Bias, Steve; [email protected];
[email protected]; Marko Milivojevic 


Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] EIGRP unequal cost load

 

Thanks Tyson , The forumla which I mentioned is show by other vendor VOD
(INE) and rest you know.....

On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:05 AM, Tyson Scott <[email protected]> wrote:

IOS rounded the numbers

 

10^7 / 1544 = 6476.6839....

25000/10 = 2500

remove the decimal values and you get 6476 & 2500

 

(6476 + 2500)*256 = 2297856.  There is no problem with the formula.  IOS
simply didn't take it out to the full number.

 

You guys just need to think thru what is happening.

 

Regards,

 

Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP

Managing Partner / Sr. Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.

Mailto: [email protected]

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208

Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat

eFax: +1.810.454.0130

 

IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand,
Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco
CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider) certification(s) with
training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and
Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at
www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com
<http://www.ipexpert.com/> 

 

From: Di Bias, Steve [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 1:20 PM
To: amit chopra 


Cc: Tyson Scott; [email protected];
[email protected]; Marko Milivojevic

Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_RS] EIGRP unequal cost load 

 

I agree that this is odd, hoping someone can shed some light, how can these
formulas lie?

 

Delay = sum of all delays in the path in 10's of microseconds (multiplied)
by 256

Bandwidth = [10 o the 7th power / (least bandwidth in kilobits per sec)] *
256         

Metric = (bandwidth + delay)

 

  _____  

From: amit chopra [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 10:10 AM
To: Di Bias, Steve
Cc: Tyson Scott; [email protected];
[email protected]; Marko Milivojevic
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] EIGRP unequal cost load

 

Yes Steve , you are right , the result is same. it is alwyas werid becuase
most of COD/VOD/Book give this formula and claim it will match but every now
then when ever I study this topic I got a differnce in calculation. 

 

Look like we may miss something  when we calculate metic with given formula.

 

 

On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Di Bias, Steve <[email protected]>
wrote:

Tyson, I used this formula and came up with the same results

 

Delay = sum of all delays in the path in 10's of microseconds (multiplied)
by 256

Bandwidth = [10 o the 7th power / (least bandwidth in kilobits per sec)] *
256

 

Metric = [k1 * bandwidth + (k2 * bandwidth)/(256 - load) + k3 * delay]

 

Or in the case of only K1 and K3

 

Metric = (slowest link bandwidth) + (sum of all delays)

 

10000000 / 1544 = 6476.6839378238341968911917098446 x 256 = 1658031

2500 x 256 = 640000

1658031 + 640000 = 2298031

 

Steve

 

  _____  

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tyson Scott
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 9:48 AM
To: 'amit chopra'; [email protected];
[email protected]; 'Marko Milivojevic'
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] EIGRP unequal cost load

 

Did you go thru this blog.

 

http://blog.ipexpert.com/2010/05/03/eigrp-unequal-cost-load-balancing/

 

Your numbers are a little off

 

It should be 256 & 10^10

 

Regards,

 

Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP

Managing Partner / Sr. Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.

Mailto: [email protected]

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208

Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat

eFax: +1.810.454.0130

 

IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand,
Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco
CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider) certification(s) with
training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and
Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at
www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com
<http://www.ipexpert.com/> 

 

From: amit chopra [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 12:22 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; Marko
Milivojevic; Tyson Scott
Subject: EIGRP unequal cost load

 

Always an issue when it is come to calculation :) I watched VOD for EIGRP
unequal cost load balacing and try to calculate FD by following formula 

 

 

Rack1R5#show ip eigrp topology 4.0.0.0
IP-EIGRP (AS 100): Topology entry for 4.0.0.0/8
  State is Passive, Query origin flag is 1, 2 Successor(s), FD is 2297856
  Routing Descriptor Blocks:
  155.1.0.4 (Serial1/0.1), from 155.1.0.4, Send flag is 0x0
      Composite metric is (2297856/128256), Route is Internal
      Vector metric:
        Minimum bandwidth is 1544 Kbit
        Total delay is 25000 microseconds
        Reliability is 255/255
        Load is 1/255
        Minimum MTU is 1500
        Hop count is 1

To know how metric calculated on above output , I used following formula:

 a) 2.56 x 10^12 / BW (in bps)       = 2.56 x 1000000000000 / 1544000 =
1658031.0880829015544041450777202 = 1658031

b) Delay : 2500 x 256 = 640000

Metric = a + b = 1658031 + 640000 = 2298031

Now as per output  , The metric for 4.0.0.0 is  2297856 and if I subtract
both metric it will come up 175 , not sure why it is not match exactly.

The 4.0.0.0 prefix is advertise by router 4 :

Rack1R4# sh ip eigrp topology 4.0.0.0
IP-EIGRP (AS 100): Topology entry for 4.0.0.0/8
  State is Passive, Query origin flag is 1, 1 Successor(s), FD is 128256
  Routing Descriptor Blocks:
  0.0.0.0 (Loopback4), from Connected, Send flag is 0x0
      Composite metric is (128256/0), Route is Internal
      Vector metric:
        Minimum bandwidth is 10000000 Kbit
        Total delay is 5000 microseconds
        Reliability is 255/255
        Load is 1/255
        Minimum MTU is 1514
        Hop count is 0
Rack1R4#

Please guys help




UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited, and may be
punishable by law. If this was sent to you in error, please notify the
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. 

 




UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited, and may be
punishable by law. If this was sent to you in error, please notify the
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. 

 

 

_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to