Can anyone tell me the difference between Port channel and Ether channel? I need a real difference.
Regards, Sibtain Sent from my iPhone 4 On Dec 10, 2010, at 9:00 PM, Carlos Valero <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > I have a general question about Route Tagging. > > Although the general idea seems pretty simple, > the actual implementation can be VERY complex and it usually leads to BIG > mess! > > So my question is: > > How likely are we to find Route Tagging Lab scenarios in the real CCIE Lab > Exam? > > > I had been told that it is very unlikely that we'll have to deal with it in > the Exam. > > Is that true? Should I not pay too much attention to it and basically > "gamble" on the possibility of NOT finding it in the real Lab Exam? > > > How about real life? > > Does anyone really mess with these Tags in real life? > > Or is it a seldom use feature as so many obscure IOS features? > > I hope somebody can shed some light on this. > > Thanks!! > > > --- On Mon, 11/2/09, Vikas Sharma <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: Vikas Sharma <[email protected]> > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Route tagging and redistribution between an IGP and > EGP > To: "CCIE_RS OnlineStudyList" <[email protected]> > Date: Monday, November 2, 2009, 7:13 PM > > Hi Guys, > > I need your help out here. I have created a lab in GNS as follows: > > R0 - R1 - R2 - R3 all run EIGRP. > > R2 - R3 - R4 run BGP as well. > > R2 - R3 redistribute EIGRP into BGP and vice versa. > > I am attaching a zip file with the drawing plus configs and the NET file. > > The intention of this lab is as follows. > > R0 and R1 simulate 2 client sites connected together. > We have a route map on each router that sets tags on routes that are not > local to that particular site. > This route map is applied to a distribute list in the direction of routers R2 > and R3 respectively. > I managed to get the EIGRP part working. > However, as far as tagging routes is concerned, for some reason R1 has > stopped tagging routes to send them onwards to R3. It worked yesterday and > not today and I wonder if this is a GNS thing. > On R2 and R3 there is another route map that looks for tags and then does an > as-prepend to make tagged routes more expensive and send them to R4 which is > like a remote site router. The idea is that BGP must see 2 paths which we > influence, in its routing table and should one of the sites (either R0 or R1) > goes off the air it should automatically be able to use the second path to > reach that network. > When I apply the redistribute statement with the route map in BGP on routers > R2 and R3, I find that the BGP routing table has only a few networks learnt > and no alternative path. > I then took off the redistribute eigrp statement off the BGP config and > re-added it in without the route-map and lo and behold, I see all the routes > on R4 and each have an alternative path. Result is exactly as I want but I > want to influence the routes in BGP. So, basically, if routes originating on > R0 and seen on R2, the routing on R4 for those networks should be via R2 and > not R3. Right now I'm not able to influence these routing decisions. > However, without the route-map, it works beautifully but I want to use route > tagging to influence how BGP decides where to route and have an alternative > path. > > I look forward to your feedback. > > Cheers, > > -- > Vikas Sharma > Network Specialist > Fujitsu Australia > (M): 0421 052 117 > > -----Inline Attachment Follows----- > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
