Thanks Ricardo for the explanation it makes sense now.

however, I agree for the ACL range but what about the command


match ip rtp 16384 16383 . it matches every even number in the RTP UDP range
16384 32767 right ?


Thanks




But the example are match ip

2010/12/17 Ricardo <[email protected]>

> Nicolas,
>
> When working with ranges in a class map definition we define the starting
> port number and the range of ports, ie 16384 as staring port and 16383 more
> ports, that is up to port 32767.
>
> When using ACL we define a range: ie starting and ending port.
>
> Moreover when we work with ACL we define ANY traffic using UDP and with
> class-maps only the RTP using UDP ports.
>
> To talk about something deeper however is that a good thing of ACL though
> is that we have included RTCP (odd even port numbers) as well, not in the
> class map matching RTP Only.
>
> //r.a.
>
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 6:25 AM, Nicolas MICHEL <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Hey there guys!
>>
>> I'm actually reading Cisco QoS Book from Wendell Odom and something is
>> interesting here.
>>
>> They are using class-map like this to match ALL RTP traffic
>>
>> class-map RTP
>> match ip rtp 16384 16383
>>
>>
>> Isn't that weird ? In most document I see that they use an ACL that match
>> UDP 16384 to 32767 .
>>
>>
>> Can someone have some hints about this ?
>>
>>
>> many thanks for the help provided.
>>
>>
>>
>> Nicolas
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>
>


-- 
Nicolas MICHEL
Ingenieur Réseaux et Securité (CCNA/CCNP)
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to