I don't think it would redistribute all the connected interfaces of the router. It would only redistribute those participating in the routing process.
Correct me if I'm mistaken.. On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Jason Maynard <[email protected]>wrote: > Then perhaps you make a decision not to use the " include-connected" (if > you > do not want all connected interfaces included) and just use a route-map > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > [email protected] > Sent: December-16-10 5:45 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Redistribution in RIPng in IPv6 > > I have noticed when redistributing routing protocols in IPv6 we need > include > "includ-connected" command which means we are adding the connected > interfaces which not part of the routing process. > > Now isn't it like problem ? Why should we redistribute the connected routes > and in some cases it is very much possiable that we want thses interfaces > not to be part of the routing process and also never be restributed into a > routing protocol. > > Any advice ? > Regards... > Amer > > > Sent from my BlackBerryR smartphone provided by mobily. > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
