We'll see...

Regards,
Jay McMickle- CCNP,CCSP,CCDP
Sent from my iPhone
http://mycciepursuit.wordpress.com


On Mar 31, 2011, at 10:57 PM, "Di Bias, Steve" <[email protected]> wrote:

> LOL, my calculations put me at a December attempt, I think you should push 
> yours back! :)
> 
> Jay McMickle <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Thanks to all for your help.  Although the FRS is a set it and forget it, 
> it's going to require way too much time to isolate and troubleshoot.  And, 
> being that it's not something we're tested on, I'd rather spend that precious 
> time labbing and not being concerned with these Frame WIC's. 
>  
> I swapped them out for WIC2T's (I actually put them in all 10 devices, using 
> SmartSerial cables).  No issues.
>  
> Thanks again for all of the input the feedback.  Happy Labbing.
>  
> PS- Anyone planning to Lab in the last quarter this year in San Jose, CA.? 
> I'm shooting for October and I'm trying to get Steve DiBias to quit weining 
> out and take it with me.  ;)  (How's that for a call out, Steve...?)
>  
>  
> 
> Regards,
> Jay McMickle- CCNP, CCSP, CCDP, MCSE
> http://mycciepursuit.wordpress.com/
>  
> 
> 
> From: Rogelio Gamino <[email protected]>
> To: Max Pierson <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Di Bias, Steve" <[email protected]>; Jay McMickle 
> <[email protected]>; IPExpert Online <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thu, March 31, 2011 6:30:00 PM
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Frame-Relay Switch WIC's
> 
> 56k vs 64k channels. 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Mar 31, 2011, at 5:50 PM, Max Pierson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Yea, if your stuck with VWICS (which were really made for voice anyway),
> > it's a pain to get these to work for data. Something I forgot to add
> > earlier, when I did had this as point-to-point HDLC circuit, I had all 24
> > channels in group 0 as configs above show, but when I finally got it to
> > work, I noticed at the top of "show interface s0/0/??" , BW did not total up
> > to 1544 like non-VWICS do, it was more like 1300 or 1400 (some missing bits
> > :). As I mentioned earlier, I believe this has to do with the timeslots
> > themselves.
> > 
> > I do not have a pair to lab up and check again, but if someone wants to
> > verify my 2006 findings, please confirm or deny my findings.
> > 
> > Any Jedi's out there know what the reasoning behind timeslots on VWICS
> > configured in channel-group mode being different than timeslots in
> > channel-group mode on non-VWICS?? (That is if i'm not totally losing my
> > mind).
> > 
> > Max
> > 
> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Di Bias, Steve 
> > <[email protected]>wrote:
> > 
> >> Well I tried to use these cards in my frame switch and never got it
> >> working.
> >> 
> >> In the end I swapped out the VWIC-2MFT-T1's for WIC-1DSU-T1's and my frame
> >> switch started working like a champ!
> >> 
> >> I found an article that shows its possible (according this guy), but I
> >> couldn't get it working myself
> >> 
> >> 
> >> http://dreamforccie.wordpress.com/2010/03/22/convert-your-e1t1-pri-to-serial-interface/
> >> 
> >> After enabling "frame-relay switching" I created the serial interfaces and
> >> configured my hub and spoke but to no avail. On my VWICS I saw CD lights 
> >> and
> >> no alarms but the interfaces were up / protocol down
> >> 
> >> My commands for creating the serial interfaces
> >> 
> >> controller T1 0/0
> >> framing esf
> >> linecode b8zs
> >> channel-group 0 timeslots 1-24
> >> !
> >> controller T1 0/1
> >> framing esf
> >> linecode b8zs
> >> channel-group 0 timeslots 1-24
> >> 
> >> Now this created the following serial interfaces which I configured as
> >> follows
> >> 
> >> Serial0/0:0
> >> Serial0/1:0
> >> 
> >> interface Serial0/0:0
> >> no ip address
> >> encapsulation frame-relay
> >> logging event subif-link-status
> >> logging event dlci-status-change
> >> clockrate 56000
> >> no frame-relay inverse-arp
> >> frame-relay intf-type dce
> >> frame-relay route 204 interface Serial0/1:0 402
> >> 
> >> interface Serial0/1:0
> >> no ip address
> >> encapsulation frame-relay
> >> logging event subif-link-status
> >> logging event dlci-status-change
> >> clockrate 56000
> >> no frame-relay inverse-arp
> >> frame-relay intf-type dce
> >> frame-relay route 402 interface Serial0/0:0 204
> >> 
> >> Again once I swapped them out with regular old WIC cards it started working
> >> like a champ!
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Thank you.
> >> 
> >> Steve Di Bias
> >> Network Engineer - Information Systems
> >> Valley Health System - Las Vegas
> >> Office - 702- 369-7594
> >> Cell - 702-241-1801
> >> [email protected]
> >> 
> >> Thank you,
> >> 
> >> Steve Di Bias
> >> Network Engineer - Information Systems
> >> Valley Health System - Las Vegas
> >> Office - 702- 369-7594
> >> Cell - 702-241-1801
> >> [email protected]
> >> 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:
> >> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Max Pierson
> >> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 7:42 AM
> >> To: Jay McMickle
> >> Cc: IPExpert Online
> >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Frame-Relay Switch WIC's
> >> 
> >> Hi Jay,
> >> 
> >> I've been down this road before with those interfaces. I'm not sure on
> >> frame-relay, but when I had a point-to-point setup (HDLC), I could not get
> >> the circuit to come up with VWIC2-2MFT-T1 on one side and WIC-DSU on the
> >> other side (status stayed as up/down). As soon as I changed both sides to
> >> the VWIC2-2MFT-T1, line-protocol came right up. I was told that there's
> >> some
> >> slight difference in how the channel-groups are setup when you're
> >> provisioning the timeslots for the interface. I havent dug into it much
> >> more
> >> than that since I was able to get it to work with the same card on each
> >> side.
> >> 
> >> Frame might be a whole other story, but I would start by having both WIC's
> >> be the same on each side if that's possible.
> >> 
> >> Max
> >> 
> >> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Jay McMickle <[email protected]
> >>> wrote:
> >> 
> >>> Has anyone ever setup a Frame-relay switch using VWIC2-2MFT-T1/E1 as
> >> their
> >>> cards?  I can make the normal WIC2T or WICv2/WIC-DSU's work just fine.
> >>> A buddy
> >>> of mine thought that you couldn't use this type of card since it creates
> >>> the
> >>> slotted interface (shown below). Again, if I take the same config and
> >> swap
> >>> out
> >>> the interface name on the same router, FRS works.  I searched and
> >> searched,
> >>> but
> >>> I only see these cards being used on the CCIE Voice tracks.  Any help is
> >>> appreciated.
> >>> 
> >>> frame-relay switching
> >>> 
> >>> interface Serial0/1/1:3
> >>> no ip address
> >>> encapsulation frame-relay
> >>> frame-relay intf-type dce
> >>> frame-relay route 602 interface Serial0/0/0:0 206
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Jay McMickle- CCNP, CCSP, CCDP, MCSE
> >>> http://mycciepursuit.wordpress.com/
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> >>> visit www.ipexpert.com
> >>> 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> >> visit www.ipexpert.com
> >> 
> >> 
> >> UHS Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any
> >> attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may
> >> contain confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review,
> >> use, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited.  If this
> >> was sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
> >> destroy all copies of the original message.
> > _______________________________________________
> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> > visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, 
> is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential 
> and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or 
> distribution of this information is prohibited, and may be punishable by law. 
> If this was sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail 
> and destroy all copies of the original message.
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to