Are you using the 2600 routers in GNS? I had the same problem. I used then the 
3600 routers and it worked flawless. 

Sent from my iPhone

On May 23, 2011, at 20:05, [email protected] wrote:

> Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to
>    [email protected]
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>    http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>    [email protected]
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>    [email protected]
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. GNS3 Connection Lost (Jabran Javaid)
>   2. Re: OSPF SHAMLinks (Jonathan Fernatt)
>   3. Re: OSPF SHAMLinks (Jonathan Fernatt)
>   4. Re: DocCD in pdf (Anthony Sequeira)
>   5. Re: DocCD in pdf (Di Bias, Steve)
>   6. Re: OSPF SHAMLinks (Jason Maynard)
>   7. Re: DocCD in pdf (Diego Gonzalez)
>   8. Re: GNS3 Connection Lost (Max Kamali)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 01:25:03 +0800
> From: Jabran Javaid <[email protected]>
> To: ccie online study <[email protected]>
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] GNS3 Connection Lost
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1256"
> 
> 
> Hello friends,
> 
> i am having an error on GNS3 "Connection Lost" while i execute one of the 
> internet toplogies 5.00 version of gns3. 
> BB1 , BB2 and BB3 doesnot start and i receive error in GNS3 as connection 
> lost.
> kindly assist
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Jabran Javaid
> 
>                         
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 13:25:36 -0400
> From: Jonathan Fernatt <[email protected]>
> To: Jason Maynard <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] OSPF SHAMLinks
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> 
> It has been a while but I believe if you remove the commands redistributing
> the sham link endpoints into OSPF you will be good to go.
> 
> Jon
> 
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Jason Maynard 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
> 
>> I thought I would run this by the group as I am not getting the expected
>> results in GNS3. Is there anything that I am missing when creating
>> shamlinks?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 1. Create a loopback with a /32 address on PE Routers
>> 
>> 2. Add these loopbacks to the VRF
>> 
>> 3. Advertise these loopbacks into the vrf address-family in BGP (Do
>> advertise these networks in OSPF)
>> 
>> 4. Create a shamlink in the OSPF vrf process
>> 
>> 5. Ensure /32 loopback addresses create above are not advertised in OSPF
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Complete Configuration (I only included the relevant information and it is
>> assumed the you have an already functioning MPLS network)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> PE1
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Step 1 and 2
>> 
>> interface Loopback100
>> 
>> description SHAMLINK Interface
>> 
>> ip vrf forwarding CUSTA
>> 
>> ip address 11.11.11.11 255.255.255.255
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Step 3
>> 
>> router bgp 100
>> 
>> address-family ipv4 vrf CUSTA
>> 
>> redistribute ospf 14 vrf CUSTA
>> 
>> network 11.11.11.11 mask 255.255.255.255
>> 
>> exit-address-family
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Step 4
>> 
>> router ospf 14 vrf CUSTA
>> 
>> area 0 sham-link 11.11.11.11 33.33.33.33
>> 
>> redistribute bgp 100 subnets route-map SHAM
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Step 5
>> 
>> access-list 10 permit 33.33.33.33
>> 
>> access-list 10 permit 11.11.11.11
>> 
>> !
>> 
>> route-map SHAM deny 10
>> 
>> match ip address 10
>> 
>> !
>> 
>> route-map SHAM permit 20
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> PE2
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Step 1 and 2
>> 
>> interface Loopback100
>> 
>> description SHAMLINK Interface
>> 
>> ip vrf forwarding CUSTA
>> 
>> ip address 33.33.33.33 255.255.255.255
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Step 3
>> 
>> router bgp 100
>> 
>> redistribute ospf 14 vrf CUSTA
>> 
>> network 33.33.33.33 mask 255.255.255.255
>> 
>> exit-address-family
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Step 4
>> 
>> router ospf 14 vrf CUSTA
>> 
>> area 0 sham-link 33.33.33.33 11.11.11.11
>> 
>> redistribute bgp 100 subnets route-map SHAM
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Step 5
>> 
>> access-list 10 permit 33.33.33.33
>> 
>> access-list 10 permit 11.11.11.11
>> 
>> !
>> 
>> route-map SHAM deny 10
>> 
>> match ip address 10
>> 
>> !
>> 
>> route-map SHAM permit 20
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Blog:  <http://packetsanalyzed.blogspot.com/>
>> http://packetsanalyzed.blogspot.com/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>> 
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 13:26:13 -0400
> From: Jonathan Fernatt <[email protected]>
> To: Jason Maynard <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] OSPF SHAMLinks
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> 
> I mis-read your configuration sorry :)
> 
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Jonathan Fernatt <[email protected]>wrote:
> 
>> It has been a while but I believe if you remove the commands redistributing
>> the sham link endpoints into OSPF you will be good to go.
>> 
>> Jon
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Jason Maynard 
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>> 
>>> I thought I would run this by the group as I am not getting the expected
>>> results in GNS3. Is there anything that I am missing when creating
>>> shamlinks?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 1. Create a loopback with a /32 address on PE Routers
>>> 
>>> 2. Add these loopbacks to the VRF
>>> 
>>> 3. Advertise these loopbacks into the vrf address-family in BGP (Do
>>> advertise these networks in OSPF)
>>> 
>>> 4. Create a shamlink in the OSPF vrf process
>>> 
>>> 5. Ensure /32 loopback addresses create above are not advertised in OSPF
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Complete Configuration (I only included the relevant information and it is
>>> assumed the you have an already functioning MPLS network)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> PE1
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Step 1 and 2
>>> 
>>> interface Loopback100
>>> 
>>> description SHAMLINK Interface
>>> 
>>> ip vrf forwarding CUSTA
>>> 
>>> ip address 11.11.11.11 255.255.255.255
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Step 3
>>> 
>>> router bgp 100
>>> 
>>> address-family ipv4 vrf CUSTA
>>> 
>>> redistribute ospf 14 vrf CUSTA
>>> 
>>> network 11.11.11.11 mask 255.255.255.255
>>> 
>>> exit-address-family
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Step 4
>>> 
>>> router ospf 14 vrf CUSTA
>>> 
>>> area 0 sham-link 11.11.11.11 33.33.33.33
>>> 
>>> redistribute bgp 100 subnets route-map SHAM
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Step 5
>>> 
>>> access-list 10 permit 33.33.33.33
>>> 
>>> access-list 10 permit 11.11.11.11
>>> 
>>> !
>>> 
>>> route-map SHAM deny 10
>>> 
>>> match ip address 10
>>> 
>>> !
>>> 
>>> route-map SHAM permit 20
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> PE2
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Step 1 and 2
>>> 
>>> interface Loopback100
>>> 
>>> description SHAMLINK Interface
>>> 
>>> ip vrf forwarding CUSTA
>>> 
>>> ip address 33.33.33.33 255.255.255.255
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Step 3
>>> 
>>> router bgp 100
>>> 
>>> redistribute ospf 14 vrf CUSTA
>>> 
>>> network 33.33.33.33 mask 255.255.255.255
>>> 
>>> exit-address-family
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Step 4
>>> 
>>> router ospf 14 vrf CUSTA
>>> 
>>> area 0 sham-link 33.33.33.33 11.11.11.11
>>> 
>>> redistribute bgp 100 subnets route-map SHAM
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Step 5
>>> 
>>> access-list 10 permit 33.33.33.33
>>> 
>>> access-list 10 permit 11.11.11.11
>>> 
>>> !
>>> 
>>> route-map SHAM deny 10
>>> 
>>> match ip address 10
>>> 
>>> !
>>> 
>>> route-map SHAM permit 20
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Blog:  <http://packetsanalyzed.blogspot.com/>
>>> http://packetsanalyzed.blogspot.com/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>> 
>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 10:27:30 -0700
> From: Anthony Sequeira <[email protected]>
> To: Diego Gonzalez <[email protected]>, OSL Routing and Switching
>    <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] DocCD in pdf
> Message-ID:
>    
> <df93819ca7ed6b4ca08ce919934f65a8010900b3c...@exvmbx015-6.exch015.msoutlookonline.net>
>    
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> No - you will not have Adobe for reading the PDFs - unless there has been a 
> very recent change in that. 
> 
> The only search option you have - is to search on a page in Internet 
> Explorer. (CTRL +F)
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Diego Gonzalez
> Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 12:58 PM
> To: OSL Routing and Switching
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] DocCD in pdf
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Is available in Lab Exam the option to download pdf book in each topic?
> If so, is available search option inside these pdfs? If not, is available 
> search option in browsers?
> 
> These pdfs are more confortable for me that html.
> 
> Thanks
> Cheers.
> 
> Diego.
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 13:27:51 -0400
> From: "Di Bias, Steve" <[email protected]>
> To: Diego Gonzalez <[email protected]>, OSL Routing and Switching
>    <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] DocCD in pdf
> Message-ID:
>    <2fe030039b8ad14eb4373ca25779c63e91e6324...@corp-exvs01.corp.uhsinc.biz>
>    
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> For the lab you should probably stick to using the web interface (IMO) , and 
> yes search within a document using CTRL+F should be available as well 
> 
> HTH
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Steve Di Bias
> Network Engineer - Information Systems
> Valley Health System - Las Vegas
> Office - 702- 369-7594
> Cell - 702-241-1801
> [email protected]
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Diego Gonzalez
> Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 9:58 AM
> To: OSL Routing and Switching
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] DocCD in pdf
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Is available in Lab Exam the option to download pdf book in each topic?
> If so, is available search option inside these pdfs? If not, is available
> search option in browsers?
> 
> These pdfs are more confortable for me that html.
> 
> Thanks
> Cheers.
> 
> Diego.
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> 
> 
> UHS Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments, 
> is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain 
> confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use, 
> disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited.  If this was 
> sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy 
> all copies of the original message.
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 6
> Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 13:38:11 -0400
> From: "Jason Maynard" <[email protected]>
> To: "'Jonathan Fernatt'" <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] OSPF SHAMLinks
> Message-ID: <017601cc1970$311bf890$9353e9b0$@com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;    charset="us-ascii"
> 
> I think it has to do with GNS3 (whether the hardware it is running on or
> just GNS3) - 
> 
> 
> 
> I see the SHAM Links come up but it is not preferred over the backdoor link
> even though the cost of the SHAM is 1 and the cost of the backdoors are
> 10000
> 
> 
> 
> Anthony/Marko/Tyson - Any comments
> 
> 
> 
> PE1
> 
> Sham Link OSPF_SL2 to address 33.33.33.33 is up
> 
> Area 14 source address 11.11.11.11
> 
>  Run as demand circuit
> 
>  DoNotAge LSA allowed. Cost of using 1 State POINT_TO_POINT,
> 
>  Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 40, Wait 40,
> 
>    Hello due in 00:00:00
> 
> 
> 
> PE2
> 
> Sham Link OSPF_SL2 to address 11.11.11.11 is up
> 
> Area 14 source address 33.33.33.33
> 
> Run as demand circuit
> 
>  DoNotAge LSA allowed. Cost of using 1 State POINT_TO_POINT,
> 
>  Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 40, Wait 40,
> 
>    Hello due in 00:00:05
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: Jonathan Fernatt [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: May-23-11 1:26 PM
> To: Jason Maynard
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] OSPF SHAMLinks
> 
> 
> 
> I mis-read your configuration sorry :)
> 
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Jonathan Fernatt <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
> It has been a while but I believe if you remove the commands redistributing
> the sham link endpoints into OSPF you will be good to go.
> 
> 
> 
> Jon
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Jason Maynard <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
> I thought I would run this by the group as I am not getting the expected
> results in GNS3. Is there anything that I am missing when creating
> shamlinks?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 1. Create a loopback with a /32 address on PE Routers
> 
> 2. Add these loopbacks to the VRF
> 
> 3. Advertise these loopbacks into the vrf address-family in BGP (Do
> advertise these networks in OSPF)
> 
> 4. Create a shamlink in the OSPF vrf process
> 
> 5. Ensure /32 loopback addresses create above are not advertised in OSPF
> 
> 
> 
> Complete Configuration (I only included the relevant information and it is
> assumed the you have an already functioning MPLS network)
> 
> 
> 
> PE1
> 
> 
> 
> Step 1 and 2
> 
> interface Loopback100
> 
> description SHAMLINK Interface
> 
> ip vrf forwarding CUSTA
> 
> ip address 11.11.11.11 255.255.255.255
> 
> 
> 
> Step 3
> 
> router bgp 100
> 
> address-family ipv4 vrf CUSTA
> 
> redistribute ospf 14 vrf CUSTA
> 
> network 11.11.11.11 mask 255.255.255.255
> 
> exit-address-family
> 
> 
> 
> Step 4
> 
> router ospf 14 vrf CUSTA
> 
> area 0 sham-link 11.11.11.11 33.33.33.33
> 
> redistribute bgp 100 subnets route-map SHAM
> 
> 
> 
> Step 5
> 
> access-list 10 permit 33.33.33.33
> 
> access-list 10 permit 11.11.11.11
> 
> !
> 
> route-map SHAM deny 10
> 
> match ip address 10
> 
> !
> 
> route-map SHAM permit 20
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> PE2
> 
> 
> 
> Step 1 and 2
> 
> interface Loopback100
> 
> description SHAMLINK Interface
> 
> ip vrf forwarding CUSTA
> 
> ip address 33.33.33.33 255.255.255.255
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Step 3
> 
> router bgp 100
> 
> redistribute ospf 14 vrf CUSTA
> 
> network 33.33.33.33 mask 255.255.255.255
> 
> exit-address-family
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Step 4
> 
> router ospf 14 vrf CUSTA
> 
> area 0 sham-link 33.33.33.33 11.11.11.11
> 
> redistribute bgp 100 subnets route-map SHAM
> 
> 
> 
> Step 5
> 
> access-list 10 permit 33.33.33.33
> 
> access-list 10 permit 11.11.11.11
> 
> !
> 
> route-map SHAM deny 10
> 
> match ip address 10
> 
> !
> 
> route-map SHAM permit 20
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Blog:  <http://packetsanalyzed.blogspot.com/>
> http://packetsanalyzed.blogspot.com/
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 7
> Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 19:55:55 +0200
> From: Diego Gonzalez <[email protected]>
> To: "Di Bias, Steve" <[email protected]>
> Cc: OSL Routing and Switching <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] DocCD in pdf
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> 
> Thanks guys!
> 
> Cheers.
> 
> 2011/5/23 Di Bias, Steve <[email protected]>
> 
>> For the lab you should probably stick to using the web interface (IMO) ,
>> and yes search within a document using CTRL+F should be available as well
>> 
>> HTH
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> 
>> Steve Di Bias
>> Network Engineer - Information Systems
>> Valley Health System - Las Vegas
>> Office - 702- 369-7594
>> Cell - 702-241-1801
>> [email protected]
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:
>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Diego Gonzalez
>> Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 9:58 AM
>> To: OSL Routing and Switching
>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] DocCD in pdf
>> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> Is available in Lab Exam the option to download pdf book in each topic?
>> If so, is available search option inside these pdfs? If not, is available
>> search option in browsers?
>> 
>> These pdfs are more confortable for me that html.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Cheers.
>> 
>> Diego.
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>> 
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>> 
>> 
>> UHS Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any
>> attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may
>> contain confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review,
>> use, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited.  If this
>> was sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
>> destroy all copies of the original message.
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 8
> Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 11:04:47 -0700
> From: Max Kamali <[email protected]>
> To: Jabran Javaid <[email protected]>
> Cc: ccie online study <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] GNS3 Connection Lost
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
> 
> try putting the BB routers on a different hyporvisor. I notice the same error 
> when trying to start more than 9 virtual routers. 
> 
> -masiko
> 
> On May 23, 2011, at 10:25 AM, Jabran Javaid wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Hello friends,
>> 
>> i am having an error on GNS3 "Connection Lost" while i execute one of the 
>> internet toplogies 5.00 version of gns3. 
>> BB1 , BB2 and BB3 doesnot start and i receive error in GNS3 as connection 
>> lost.
>> kindly assist
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Jabran Javaid
>> 
>>                         
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>> 
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> 
> 
> 
> End of CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 64, Issue 54
> ***************************************
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Reply via email to