Blah. Brain fart. EIGRP doesn't have a cumulative metric... Only cumulative delay in the Vector Metric. I see where my thinking was going wrong on this one now.
:) On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 7:58 PM, J D'Silva <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey everyone, > > I'm fighting my way through the sections in the subject and I'm baffled by > the behavior I'm seeing in EIGRPv6. Can anyone help to to understand how > these two routes are coming in with very different ADs and yet R6 is > calculating the same FD for them? Both receiving interfaces have the same > values for metric calculation, and yet both routes end up with the same FD > even though one comes in with 230400 less on the AD. > > > R6#sh ipv6 eigrp top 2001:100::5/128 > IPv6-EIGRP (AS 100): Topology entry for 2001:100::5/128 > State is Passive, Query origin flag is 1, 2 Successor(s), FD is 5511936 > Routing Descriptor Blocks: > FE80::5 (Serial0/1/0.56), from FE80::5, Send flag is 0x0 > Composite metric is (5511936/25600), Route is External > Vector metric: > Minimum bandwidth is 512 Kbit > Total delay is 20000 microseconds > Reliability is 255/255 > Load is 1/255 > Minimum MTU is 1500 > Hop count is 1 > External data: > Originating router is 200.0.0.5 > AS number of route is 1 > External protocol is OSPF, external metric is 0 > Administrator tag is 0 (0x00000000) > FE80::2 (Serial0/1/0.26), from FE80::2, Send flag is 0x0 > Composite metric is (5511936/256000), Route is External > Vector metric: > Minimum bandwidth is 512 Kbit > Total delay is 20000 microseconds > Reliability is 255/255 > Load is 1/255 > Minimum MTU is 1500 > Hop count is 1 > External data: > Originating router is 200.0.0.2 > AS number of route is 1 > External protocol is OSPF, external metric is 195 > Administrator tag is 110 (0x0000006E) > > > Thanks! > > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
