Alef, I'm not looking at it but it's probably a mistake. You would never want to "no passive" on a loopback since you will never form a neighbor relationship on a loopback.
________________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alef [[email protected]] Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 8:12 AM To: [email protected] IE Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] dsg vol2 4.0 ospf configuration when it says: don't send unnecessary updates to your loopback interfaces on any router and the DSG does no passive interface on the loopback how does that achieve the purpose ? when you passive something out it only receives, not sends. so when you no passive it out it would also send.. would it not be more intuitive to do the inverse, i.e. instead of : pass defau no pass lo0 no pass defa pass lo0 ? Alef _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If this was sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
