I thought shape adaptive meant the router adjust based on becn received? Is that what you are saying?
On Sep 17, 2011, at 9:19 PM, Adam Booth <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > In this case I would apply the service policy directly to the PPP Multilink > interface, but have any frame-relay specific parameters done by using a > map-class which is applied to (individual) PVCs - this way you don't need to > worry about things like qos preclassify > > Shape Active as you indicate only means that something is being held back in > the queue when you are looking at the state. You could test this by doing a > ping test (with a timeout of 0) from another device that goes through the > Multilink connection. > > Cheers, > Adam > > > > On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Huang, Kevin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Did anyone reply to this question? >> I apologize if I missed it, but I myself am curious about it... >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Combatant101 [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 11:50 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] MLPPPoFR - Confused.com >> >> Hi Guys, >> >> >> >> If we have a Multilink over frame relay and we want to do QoS are we good >> to >> apply the service-policy under the multilink interface or do we apply the >> service-policy under the map-class frame-relay which is then associated to >> the frame-relay interface-dlci ? >> >> >> >> I've done both and the show commands seems to suggest both are valid, >> except >> applying it under the Multilink interface shows (show policy-map interface) >> the Shape Active field as 'NO' (I read somewhere that this will only say >> YES >> if shaping is actually happening - is that correct?) >> >> >> >> However I don't see this column if it is applied under the map-class >> >> >> >> So my question really is either option valid or only one, and if so which >> one and why! >> >> >> >> Ps. Ignore legacy frame-relay traffic shaping for now as I'm interested in >> MQC Frame-Relay traffic shaping, just not sure where to apply the >> service-policy - I think both ways is correct but have no real way of >> verifying this and as stated earlier, the show commands are a little bit >> misleading/confusing to me. >> >> >> >> >> >> Many Thanks, >> >> >> >> Combatant101 >> >> >> >> My IT Blog > http://myitgeekblog.wordpress.com >> >> CCIE Notes > http://mycciegeekblog.wordpress.com >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any files transmitted with it are >> confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to >> which they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you may >> not review, copy or distribute this message. If you have received this >> email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original >> message. Neither the sender nor the company for which he or she works >> accepts any liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this >> email. >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
