New format principle is self-explanatoryŠ I use it as a standard part of
my bgp template when configuringŠ rather than try and remember when to use
it for tasks requested in bgp, mp-bgp, etc.. I just make it a standard,
that way when I potentially get to a task that requires communities to be
exchanged I can see them with having to go back to all and configure it or
wonder if the community is correct..

If it is asked NOT to be used specifically then there are probably other
things to consider in a real lab..  Like why are they asking NOT to use
it? Lol

conf t
ip bgp new

Real simpleŠ

Don


On 11/24/11 2:58 PM, "mark salmon" <[email protected]> wrote:

>I have seen several lab DSG that shows the IPV4 address family
>configuration for the main peering. Some of the labs ask for that new
>format, some do not. Anyone have any advice on when to use the new format
>where there is not obvious requirement for it?
> 
>"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be
>one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of
>blind-folded fear." Thomas Jefferson
>" Where ignorance is bliss 'tis folly to be wise"
>_______________________________________________
>For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
>To Unsubscribe from this list please visit the following link and follow
>the directions to unsubscribe.
>http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs

_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

To Unsubscribe from this list please visit the following link and follow the 
directions to unsubscribe. http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs

Reply via email to