Hi Oyebande, Thank u mate. U confirmed my understanding. So from router to switch it doesnt matter to match the native vlan on both sides. Unlike Switch to Switch to form trunk port ,native vlans should match to form trunk link to pass data traffic on that link.
Thanks all for their confirmation On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Oluwagbenga Oyebande < [email protected]> wrote: > > *CONCLUSION: We have full reachability despite the vlan mismatch.* > * > * > * > Three routers and one switch. > > > * > * > R2811(Fa0/0.1)-------------TRUNK-LINK-----------------------Cat3550 (Fa0/1) > * > * > native vlan 20 > native vlan 10 > > > R3825 > (Gi0/0.1) > ------------- > TRUNK-LINK > ----------------------- > Cat3550 (Gi0/2) > native vlan 30 > > native vlan 10 > > *R2811-forvlan10(Fa0/0)--* > ACCESS-LINK > *-----* > Cat3550 (Fa0/4) > * > * > > explicitly configured in vlan 10 as access port > > I included the third link to clear all doubts about expected behaviour of > vlan 10 connected devices. > > > * > *Catalyst 3550 Swicth Spec* > > Cat3550(config)#do sh vers | i Model num|RELEA > Cisco IOS Software, C3550 Software (C3550-IPSERVICESK9-M), Version > 12.2(44)SE3, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) > Model number: WS-C3550-24-SMI > * > * > *2811 Router Spec* > > Router(config)#do sh ver | i image > System image file is "flash:c2800nm-adventerprisek9-mz.124-24.T2.bin" > * > * > *3825 Router Spec* > * > * > R3825(config-subif)#do sh ver | i Software > Cisco IOS Software, 3800 Software (C3825-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version > 12.4(24)T2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) > > *2811 (for vlan 10 ) Router Spec * > * > * > R2811-forvlan10(config)#do sh ver | i Software > Cisco IOS Software, 2800 Software (C2800NM-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version > 12.4(24)T2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) > > > *CDP *(so we have Fas 0/1 connected to 2811and we have Gig 0/2 > connected to 3825 and Fa0/4 Connected to R2811-forvlan10) > > Cat3550(config-if)#do sh cdp nei | i R2811|R3825|ID > Device ID Local Intrfce Holdtme Capability Platform Port ID > R2811-forvlan10 Fas 0/4 123 R S I 2811 Fas 0/0 > R2811 Fas 0/1 139 R S I 2811 Fas 0/0 > R3825 Gig 0/2 129 R S I 3825 Gig 0/0 > > > *INTERFACE CONFIG* > * > * > Cat3550(config-if)#do sh run int *fa0/1* > interface FastEthernet0/1 > description *TRUNK to R2811* > switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q > switchport trunk native vlan 10 > switchport mode trunk > end > > Cat3550(config-if)#do sh run int fa0/4 > interface FastEthernet0/4 > description *ACCESS LINK TO R2811-forvlan10* > switchport access vlan 10 > switchport mode access > end > > Cat3550(config-if)#do sh run int gi0/2 > interface GigabitEthernet0/2 > description *TRUNK to R3825* > switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q > switchport trunk native vlan 10 > switchport mode trunk > end > > Cat3550(config-if)#do sh run int vlan 10 > interface Vlan10 > ip address 10.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 > end > > Cat3550(config-if)#do sh int status > Port Name Status Vlan Duplex Speed Type > Fa0/1 TRUNK to R2811 connected trunk a-full a-100 > 10/100BaseTX > Fa0/4 ACCESS LINK TO R28 connected 10 a-full a-100 > 10/100Base > Gi0/2 TRUNK to R3825 connected trunk a-full a-1000 > 1000BaseSX > > *VLANS* > * > * > VLAN Name Status Ports > ---- -------------------------------- --------- > ------------------------------- > 1 default active Fa0/2, Fa0/3, Fa0/5, Fa0/6 > Fa0/7, Fa0/8, Fa0/9, Fa0/10 > Fa0/11, Fa0/12, Fa0/13, > Fa0/14 > Fa0/15, Fa0/16, Fa0/17, > Fa0/18 > Gi0/1 > 10 VLAN0010 active Fa0/4 > 20 VLAN0020 active > 30 VLAN0030 active > > > R2811(config-subif)#do sh run int fa0/0.1 > interface FastEthernet0/0.1 > description "MISMATCHED NATIVE VLAN 20/10" > encapsulation dot1Q 20 native > ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 > end > > R3825(config-subif)#do sh run int gi0/0.1 > interface GigabitEthernet0/0.1 > description "MISMATCHED NATIVE VLAN 30/10" > encapsulation dot1Q 30 native > ip address 10.1.1.3 255.255.255.0 > end > > R2811-forvlan10(config-if)#do sh run int fa0/0 > interface FastEthernet0/0 > description "THIS ONE IS AN ACCESS LINK WHICH WE WILL PUT IN VLAN 10 ON > THE SWITCH" > ip address 10.1.1.4 255.255.255.0 > duplex auto > speed auto > end > > > > Cat3550(config-if)#do ping 10.1.1.255 > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.1.1.255, timeout is 2 seconds: > Reply to request 0 from 10.1.1.3, 1 ms > Reply to request 0 from 10.1.1.1, 1 ms > Reply to request 0 from 10.1.1.4, 1 ms > > R2811(config-subif)#do ping 10.1.1.255 > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.1.1.255, timeout is 2 seconds: > Reply to request 0 from 10.1.1.3, 1 ms > Reply to request 0 from 10.1.1.2, 1 ms > Reply to request 0 from 10.1.1.4, 1 ms > > > R3825(config-subif)#do ping 10.1.1.255 > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.1.1.255, timeout is 2 seconds: > Reply to request 0 from 10.1.1.2, 4 ms > Reply to request 0 from 10.1.1.1, 4 ms > Reply to request 1 from 10.1.1.2, 1 ms > Reply to request 1 from 10.1.1.1, 1 ms > Reply to request 1 from 10.1.1.4, 1 ms > > R2811-forvlan10(config-if)#do ping 10.1.1.255 > > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.1.1.255, timeout is 2 seconds: > > Reply to request 0 from 10.1.1.3, 4 ms > Reply to request 0 from 10.1.1.1, 4 ms > Reply to request 0 from 10.1.1.2, 4 ms > > > *CONCLUSION: So we have full reachability despite the vlan mismatch.* > > > Olugbenga Oyebande > > > > >> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Oluwagbenga Oyebande < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi CCIE Kid >>> >>> I agree with Narottam. I would like to add something to Q2 >>> >>> >>> Answ to Q1. The trunk will form as you have already seen. >>> >>> Answ to Q2. If by user traffic you mean IP traffic, then the answer >>> depends on the IP configuration of your switch's *VLAN 10 SVI. *If you >>> have 10.1.1.0/24 subnet configured on the switch's SVI then IP traffic >>> should pass in spite of native vlan mismatch. If you have another subnet >>> (or no ip address) configured on it then IP traffic will not pass. >>> * >>> * >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Narottam Prajapati <[email protected] >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> HI >>>> >>>> Native VLAN numbering mismatch will not affect to trunk forming >>>> process. Trunk will form between both devics. >>>> >>>> Regarding Traffic forwarding traffic will forward without any tagigng >>>> due >>>> to default behaviour of dot1q encapsulation. >>>> >>>> When router try to forward traffic to switch frames forwards up to >>>> switch >>>> and switch 2 assume that this traffic is for native VLAN traffic because >>>> frames are untaged. >>>> >>>> Hi Group >>>> >>>> make me correct if any thing is wrong. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Narottam Prajapati >>>> >>>> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Shaughn Smith <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> > Your question was answered. A few times. >>>> > >>>> > CCIE # 23962 (SP) >>>> > >>>> > Sent from my iPhone 4 >>>> > >>>> > On 09 Dec 2011, at 7:40 AM, CCIE KID <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > > Hi all, >>>> > > >>>> > > Still my question has not been answered. What will happen if a >>>> router >>>> > > connected to a switch is placed in two different native Vlans. U >>>> guys are >>>> > > all talking about connecting two switches and incorporating two >>>> different >>>> > > native vlans. >>>> > > >>>> > > My scenario is simple. R1-----------------------Sw1 >>>> > > >>>> > > I m using two different native vlans from R1 to Sw1 . Whether trunk >>>> will >>>> > > form.? Or if the trunk forms, whether user traffic will be able to >>>> pass >>>> > > through or not. >>>> > > >>>> > > Please reply to my questions >>>> > > >>>> > > Thank You >>>> > > >>>> > > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:23 AM, George J. Sanchez < >>>> [email protected] >>>> > >wrote: >>>> > > >>>> > >> I've seen plenty of customers networks with native vlan mismatches, >>>> > >> traffic will pass. With that being said, newer code may fix >>>> different >>>> > >> "features" that previous codes had issues with. >>>> > >> >>>> > >> Regards, >>>> > >> Joe Sanchez >>>> > >> >>>> > >> On Dec 8, 2011, at 1:28 PM, Narbik Kocharians <[email protected]> >>>> > wrote: >>>> > >> >>>> > >>> This is what i was referring to: >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> R1 s F0/0 is connected to SW1 s port F0/1 >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> R2 s F0/1 is connected to SW2 s port F0/2 >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> SW1 s F0/19 is connected to SW2 s F0/19 >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> *SW1#sh run int f0/19 | B inter* >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> interface FastEthernet0/19 >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> switchport trunk native vlan 10 >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> switchport mode trunk >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> end >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> * >>>> > >>> * >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> *SW2#sh run int f0/19 | B inter* >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> interface FastEthernet0/19 >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> switchport mode trunk >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> end >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> *NOTE: The trunk is UP* >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> *SW1#Show int trunk* >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> Port Mode Encapsulation Status Native vlan >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> Fa0/19 on 802.1q trunking 10 >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> Port Vlans allowed on trunk >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> Fa0/19 1-4094 >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> Port Vlans allowed and active in management domain >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> Fa0/19 1,10,80 >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> Port Vlans in spanning tree forwarding state and not pruned >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> Fa0/19 1,10,80 >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> *SW2#sh spanning-tree blockedports * >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> Name Blocked Interfaces List >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> -------------------- ------------------------------------ >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> VLAN0001 Fa0/19 >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> VLAN0010 Fa0/19 >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> Number of blocked ports (segments) in the system : 2 >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> *All Traffic is blocked for the two Vlans.* >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> *And sure you can get around it, and one way to do this is to >>>> filter >>>> > >> BPDUs >>>> > >>> that carry the VLANs as you mentioned:* >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> SW1(config)#int f0/19 >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> SW1(config-if)#spanning-tree bpdufilter en >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> *SW1#sh spannin blockedports * >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> Name Blocked Interfaces List >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> -------------------- ------------------------------------ >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> Number of blocked ports (segments) in the system : 0 >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> *And I am sure there are other ways. But remember this is the >>>> default >>>> > >>> behavior BUT not on all IOSes, on some IOSes, it will complain >>>> that >>>> > there >>>> > >>> is a Native VLAN mismatch, but it will NOT block the VLANs >>>> configured >>>> > as >>>> > >>> Native* >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Narbik Kocharians < >>>> [email protected] >>>> > >>> wrote: >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>>> Yes, you are correct, you can get around it, i was referring to >>>> the >>>> > >>>> default behavior. >>>> > >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Paul Cocker <[email protected] >>>> > >>>> > >> wrote: >>>> > >>>> >>>> > >>>>> Spanning-tree... >>>> > >>>>> >>>> > >>>>> I'm guessing the vlan is in the bpdu. >>>> > >>>>> >>>> > >>>>> with this config... >>>> > >>>>> >>>> > >>>>> SW1 >>>> > >>>>> interface FastEthernet0/13 >>>> > >>>>> switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q >>>> > >>>>> switchport trunk native vlan 10 >>>> > >>>>> switchport mode trunk >>>> > >>>>> switchport nonegotiate >>>> > >>>>> >>>> > >>>>> SW2 >>>> > >>>>> interface FastEthernet0/13 >>>> > >>>>> switchport access vlan 20 >>>> > >>>>> switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q >>>> > >>>>> switchport trunk native vlan 20 >>>> > >>>>> switchport mode trunk >>>> > >>>>> switchport nonegotiate >>>> > >>>>> no cdp enable >>>> > >>>>> >>>> > >>>>> >>>> > >>>>> you get this... >>>> > >>>>> >>>> > >>>>> *Mar 1 00:18:26.994: %SPANTREE-2-RECV_PVID_ERR: Received BPDU >>>> with >>>> > >>>>> inconsistent peer vlan id 10 on FastEthernet0/13 VLAN20. >>>> > >>>>> *Mar 1 00:18:26.994: %SPANTREE-2-BLOCK_PVID_LOCAL: Blocking >>>> > >>>>> FastEthernet0/13 on VLAN0020. Inconsistent local vlan. >>>> > >>>>> >>>> > >>>>> You can disable spanning tree, or use bpdufilter to get around >>>> it. >>>> > >>>>> >>>> > >>>>> >>>> > >>>>> On 08/12/2011 16:58, Carlos G Mendioroz wrote: >>>> > >>>>> >>>> > >>>>>> What mechanism is responsible for such blocking ? >>>> > >>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>> -Carlos >>>> > >>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>> Narbik Kocharians @ 08/12/2011 13:34 -0300 dixit: >>>> > >>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>> Between any two switch if the Native VLAN is mismatched the >>>> trunk >>>> > >> will >>>> > >>>>>>> come up but you won't be able to pass any traffic through it, >>>> and >>>> > you >>>> > >>> can >>>> > >>>>>>> see that with a "Show spanning block". >>>> > >>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 4:31 AM, David Bass >>>> > >>> <[email protected]<mailto: >>>> > >>>>>>> [email protected]**>> wrote: >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>> We are talking about CCIE lab, so best practice and "working" >>>> > >> status >>>> > >>>>>>> all go out the window :). In his scenario he's talking about >>>> > >> router >>>> > >>>>>>> to switch trunk, so no VTP or STP (if you do this switch to >>>> switch >>>> > >>>>>>> you'll definitely have issues though, so very good to >>>> know)...CDP >>>> > >>>>>>> will definitely bark non-stop though which is very >>>> irritating. >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>> On Dec 8, 2011, at 6:08 AM, Carlos G Mendioroz wrote: >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>>> May be depending on the equipment, the trunk will "form" just >>>> > fine, >>>> > >>>>>>>> if VLAN hopping is not considered to be a problem :) >>>> > >>>>>>>> CDP may barf. If VLAN 1 is involved, other griefs will pop. >>>> > >>>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>>> Different problems: >>>> > >>>>>>>> -framing: no problem, but "native VLAN" frames do not signal >>>> > >>>>>>> which VLAN >>>> > >>>>>>>> they belong to, so if they do not match, frames will hop >>>> from one >>>> > >>>>>>> VLAN >>>> > >>>>>>>> to the other. >>>> > >>>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>>> -signalling (DTP): AFAIK, VLANs are not part of the info >>>> > >>>>>>> interchanged, so the trunk will form even if native is not >>>> the >>>> > >> same. >>>> > >>>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>>> -control: (CDP/VTP/STP/...): well, you may have a problem >>>> here. >>>> > >>>>>>>> In particular, CDP/VTP go on VLAN 1, so if this is one of the >>>> > VLANs >>>> > >>>>>>>> involved in the crossing, it won't work. >>>> > >>>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>>> -Others ? >>>> > >>>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>>> -Carlos >>>> > >>>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>>> David Bass @ 08/12/2011 08:25 -0300 dixit: >>>> > >>>>>>>>> The trunk will come up fine, but you won't have IP >>>> connectivity >>>> > >>>>>>> between the 2 devices on the VLANs/subnets you are expecting >>>> > >> because >>>> > >>>>>>> the 2 native VLANs are being bridged. Do some research on >>>> how >>>> > >> dot1q >>>> > >>>>>>> trunks work and you should be able to figure it out. On Dec >>>> 7, >>>> > >> 2011, >>>> > >>>>>>> at 11:40 PM, CCIE KID <[email protected] >>>> > >>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Hi fellas, >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I tested a scenario where the Native vlan differs from the >>>> > >>>>>>> router port to >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> the switch port. I understood that if the NAtive vlan >>>> > >>>>>>> mismatches on a trunk >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> port , then appropriate trunking wont be formed. >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> But when i connect my router to a switch and in the router >>>> > >>>>>>> subinterface . I >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> am having a native vlan of 20 and in the switch port it is >>>> > >>>>>>> having a native >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> vlan of 10 , but still the trunk is forming perfectly >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Can someone correct me >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> fa0/1.1 fa0/1 >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> >>>> Router1-----------------------**------------------------Switch 1 >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Router 1 >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> inter fa 0/1.1 >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> encap dot1q 20 native >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> ip add 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> no sh >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Switch 1 >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> int fa 0/1 >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> enc dot1q 10 native >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> swi trunk enc dot >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> swi mo trunk >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> no sh >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> But s >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> With Warmest Regards, >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> CCIE KID >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> CCIE#29992 (Security) >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> ______________________________**______________________________** >>>> > >>>>>>> ___________ >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Subscription information may be found at: >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> > >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/**list/CCIELab.html< >>>> > >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/ >>>> > >>> CCIELab.html> >>>> > >>>>>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >>>> > >>>>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> ______________________________**______________________________** >>>> > >>>>>>> ___________ >>>> > >>>>>>>>> Subscription information may be found at: >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> > >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/**list/CCIELab.html< >>>> > >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/ >>>> > >>> CCIELab.html> >>>> > >>>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>>> -- >>>> > >>>>>>>> Carlos G Mendioroz <[email protected] <mailto: >>>> [email protected]>> >>>> > >>>>>>> LW7 EQI Argentina >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> ______________________________**______________________________** >>>> > >>>>>>> ___________ >>>> > >>>>>>> Subscription information may be found at: >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> > >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/**list/CCIELab.html< >>>> > >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/ >>>> > >>> CCIELab.html> >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>> -- >>>> > >>>>>>> *Narbik Kocharians >>>> > >>>>>>> *CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security) >>>> > >>>>>>> *www.MicronicsTraining.com* >>>> > >>> <http://www.micronicstraining.**com/< >>>> http://www.micronicstraining.com/ >>>> > > >>>> > >>>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>> Sr. Technical Instructor >>>> > >>>>>>> YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits! >>>> > >>>>>>> Training & Remote Racks available >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>> >>>> > >>>>> >>>> > >>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >>>> > >>>>> >>>> > >>>>> ______________________________**______________________________** >>>> > >>>>> ___________ >>>> > >>>>> Subscription information may be found at: >>>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/** >>>> > >>>>> list/CCIELab.html <http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html> >>>> > >>>>> >>>> > >>>>> >>>> > >>>>> >>>> > >>>>> >>>> > >>>>> >>>> > >>>>> >>>> > >>>>> >>>> > >>>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> > >>>> -- >>>> > >>>> *Narbik Kocharians >>>> > >>>> * >>>> > >>>> CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security) >>>> > >>>> *www.MicronicsTraining.com* <http://www.micronicstraining.com/> >>>> > >>>> Sr. Technical Instructor >>>> > >>>> YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits! >>>> > >>>> Training & Remote Racks available >>>> > >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> -- >>>> > >>> *Narbik Kocharians >>>> > >>> *CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security) >>>> > >>> *www.MicronicsTraining.com* <http://www.micronicstraining.com/> >>>> > >>> Sr. Technical Instructor >>>> > >>> YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits! >>>> > >>> Training & Remote Racks available >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> _______________________________________________________________________ >>>> > >>> Subscription information may be found at: >>>> > >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> _______________________________________________________________________ >>>> > >> Subscription information may be found at: >>>> > >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > -- >>>> > > With Warmest Regards, >>>> > > >>>> > > CCIE KID >>>> > > CCIE#29992 (Security) >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> _______________________________________________________________________ >>>> > > Subscription information may be found at: >>>> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >>>> > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________________________________ >>>> > Subscription information may be found at: >>>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >>>> >>>> >>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________________________________ >>>> Subscription information may be found at: >>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> -- >>> Olugbenga Oyebande >>> MD, DAIT >>> 234-803-302-5287 >>> http://www.dait-ng.com >>> Cisco Unified Network, VPN >>> DAIT Enterprise Network Servers >>> Broadband Internet Deployment & ISP Consultancy >>> >>> >> > > > -- > -- > Olugbenga Oyebande > MD, DAIT > 234-803-302-5287 > http://www.dait-ng.com > Cisco Unified Network, VPN > DAIT Enterprise Network Servers > Broadband Internet Deployment & ISP Consultancy > > -- With Warmest Regards, CCIE KID CCIE#29992 (Security) _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
