Hi Imran,

In ur scenario u have a single uplink and two routers connected to that
link.
So better use a switch between three routers from Router 1 is connected to
both Router 2 and Router 3 . And all three routers are connected in same
broadcast domain. So better use HSRP or GLBP or VRRP for this.

If u want NAT synchronisation , then u need FHRP . In Stateful Firewall , u
need IOS routers dude. so the ethernet handoffs from the ISP should be done
inorder to provide this requirement for router redundancy

Or else for system redundancy u can use dual RP or else Line Card
synchronisation . If primary RP fails, ur secondary RP can take care after
synchronising with the entire control plane and avoid any kind of
inconsistencies from a LC



On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 8:25 AM, WaLeEd two AlShErIf
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi Imran ,
>
> Could you add some topology ,
>
> I could suggest that you may have modular Router and you may apply the LPU
> hardware failure recovery , so you can use two interfaces on separate Line
> Cards ( LPU ) this is the way to have redundancy .
>
> Yours,
>
> Waleed Alsherif
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Bob McCouch <[email protected]>
> To: Imran Ali <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Sent: Sunday, January 1, 2012 11:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] router redundancy
>
> You could look at the Stateful NAT feature for NAT table sync across
> multiple devices.
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6600/products_white_paper09186a0080118b04.shtml
>
> As far as  I know, though, there is no equivalent feature for IOS stateful
> firewall (ZFW or CBAC). So if you're doing anything beyond basic ACLs and
> NAT for firewalling (hopefully you are) you will still have session
> breakage during a failover event.
>
> The ASA active/standby feature is much more tightly integrated than two IOS
> routers.
>
> You could still accomplish device redundancy by using two routers with a
> FHRP and a switch to split off the incoming ISP link (assuming Ethernet
> handoff) as others have mentioned, and you could also put a pair of
> active/standby ASAs behind the router pair to provide you redundancy at the
> routing layer and stateful failover of firewall/NAT/VPN function.
>
> You could build a 2N design all the way from the routers back, and in front
> of the routers have a single switch (dual buys you nothing other than a
> warm standby) with the ISP link into it.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Imran Ali <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Marc abel ,
> >
> > you are spot on  !
> >
> > but does i think this is going to be state less failover ?
> >
> >
> > is their a way to NAT synchronisaiton ?
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 10:15 PM, marc abel <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Plug your uplink and the interaces from the routers into a switch in
> the
> > > same vlan. Use hsrp. You still will have a single point of failure.
> > Unless
> > > your provider provides dual hand offs. In this case plug each uplink
> and
> > 1
> > > router into seperate switches and trunk them together.
> > > On Jan 1, 2012 12:50 PM, "Imran Ali" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> i have  only one uplink and my boss wants to implement redundancy of
> > >> routers .
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> if one router fails other should take over . HSRP , vrrp and GLBP all
> > >> required dual links . but i  want to achieve hardware redundancy and
> not
> > >> link redundancy . is this possible ?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>  the same can be achieved with asa  in active and stanby mode
> .....but
> > we
> > >> have routers instead of ASA.
> > >>
> > >> Any idea , expert can guide me ?
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> > please
> > >> visit www.ipexpert.com
> > >>
> > >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> > >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> > >>
> > >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
> > >>
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> > visit www.ipexpert.com
> >
> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> > www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> >
> > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
> >
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>



-- 
With Warmest Regards,

CCIE KID
CCIE#29992 (Security)
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs

Reply via email to