Cool - useful! OTOH I don't think I'd use it for that particular problem - I think it's probably overkill. I think I'd probably ask the proctor or if nothing else I'll just use the DLCI of another FR endpoint (one that doesn't have to be taken for testing).
Thanks! Jon. -- Jon Still <j (mailto:[email protected])[email protected]> http://www.jonstill.com/ On Friday, 6 January 2012 at 02:06, Jay McMickle wrote: > Thanks, Adam. I've learned something without actually doing anything. I > like it. ;) > > Cheers. > > > Regards, > Jay McMickle- CCNP, CCSP, CCDP, MCSE > http://mycciepursuit.wordpress.com/ > > Support me in the MS150 Challenge! > http://main.nationalmssociety.org/site/TR/Bike/TXHBikeEvents?px=5886043&pg=personal&fr_id=17896 > > > From: Adam Booth <[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])> > To: Jay McMickle <[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])> > Cc: Jon Still <[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])>; > "[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])" > <[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])> > Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2012 7:53 PM > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Full Reachability and Frame Relay > > Hi Jay, > > That's right > > hostname R1 > interface Loopback0 > ip address 10.1.12.1 255.255.255.0 > ! > interface Serial0/0 > no ip address > encapsulation frame-relay > frame-relay interface-dlci 102 ppp Virtual-Template1 > ! > interface Virtual-Template1 > ip unnumbered Loopback0 > ! > > > hostname R2 > interface Loopback0 > ip address 10.1.12.2 255.255.255.0 > ! > interface Serial0/0 > no ip address > encapsulation frame-relay > frame-relay interface-dlci 201 ppp Virtual-Template1 > ! > interface Virtual-Template1 > ip unnumbered Loopback0 > ! > > > R1#ping 10.1.12.2 > > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.1.12.2, timeout is 2 seconds: > !!!!! > Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/2/4 ms > R1#ping 10.1.12.1 > > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.1.12.1, timeout is 2 seconds: > !!!!! > Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/4 ms > R1#conf t > Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. > R1(config)#int s0/0 > R1(config-if)#shut > R1(config-if)# > *Mar 1 00:15:46.935: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Virtual-Access2, changed > state to down > *Mar 1 00:15:47.935: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface > Virtual-Access2, changed state to down > *Mar 1 00:15:48.911: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Serial0/0, changed state to > administratively down > *Mar 1 00:15:49.911: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface > Serial0/0, changed state to down > R1(config-if)#do ping 10.1.12.2 > > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.1.12.2, timeout is 2 seconds: > ..... > Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) > R1(config-if)#do ping 10.1.12.1 > > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.1.12.1, timeout is 2 seconds: > !!!!! > Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/4 ms > > > If you attach the IP addresses directly to the virtual-template you cant ping > that address locally, so using a loopback and linking it to the template > works. > > Cheers, > Adam > > > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Jay McMickle <[email protected] > (mailto:[email protected])> wrote: > > Interesting. I never tried that. To be clear (Adam), you use > > virtual-template with ip unnumbered to the loopbacks for your PPPoFR. I > > need to lab that up. > > > > Regards, > > Jay McMickle- CCNP,CCSP,CCDP > > Sent from my iPhone > > http://mycciepursuit.wordpress.com > > > > > > On Jan 5, 2012, at 6:03 PM, Adam Booth <[email protected] > > (mailto:[email protected])> wrote: > > > > > Hi Jon, > > > > > > I don't have the lab in front of me but have you considered PPPoFR? The > > > L3 > > > interfaces in the virtual template can be loopback interfaces that are > > > always up > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Adam > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Jon Still <[email protected] > > > (mailto:[email protected])> wrote: > > > > > >> Hey guys. > > >> > > >> Quick one here. I'm currently working on Vol2 Lab 2. There is a > > >> requirement for full reachability even under certain failure conditions - > > >> one of which is failure of the FR int on R2. > > >> > > >> Obviously when testing this I expect no response from the IP on R2's > > >> frame > > >> int. However I happened to have set up my frame maps for each router's > > >> local frame int IP to use the DLCI to R2 - meaning that when I shut that > > >> interface I can no longer ping the local interface IP. > > >> > > >> Would this count against me in the lab or should I just change my DLCI > > >> for > > >> the local IP to be on the safe side. Alternatively is this an 'ask the > > >> proctor' moment? > > >> > > >> Cheers, > > >> Jon. > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Jon Still <j (mailto:[email protected])[email protected] > > >> (mailto:[email protected])> > > >> http://www.jonstill.com/ > > >> > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > > >> visit www.ipexpert.com (http://www.ipexpert.com/) > > >> > > >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > > >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com (http://www.platinumplacement.com/) > > >> > > >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > > >> > > > _______________________________________________ > > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > > > visit www.ipexpert.com (http://www.ipexpert.com/) > > > > > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > > > www.PlatinumPlacement.com (http://www.platinumplacement.com/) > > > > > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > > > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
