Hi,

  2 ideas. 1) do a "show ip local policy", 2) after having shut down
the interface watch a debug with "debug ip icmp" and look for a
redirect.


Kim

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Benny Sumardy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> These are the output of :
>
> IGP (RIPv2 for connecting BGP links) :
> R4#sr | s router rip
> router rip
>  version 2
>  network 10.0.0.0
>  no auto-summary
> R4#
>
> show ip bgp :
>
>
> R4#sib
> BGP table version is 8, local router ID is 4.4.4.4
> Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - 
> internal,
>              r RIB-failure, S Stale
> Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
>
>   Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
> *> 1.0.0.0          10.1.14.1                0    400      0 100 i
> *>i2.0.0.0          10.1.23.2                0    100      0 i
> *>i3.0.0.0          10.1.34.3                0    100      0 i
> *> 4.0.0.0          0.0.0.0                  0         32768 i
> *  11.0.0.0         10.1.14.1                0             0 100 i
> *>i                 10.1.12.1                0    400      0 100 i
> R4#
>
>
> show ip route 11.1.1.1 & longer :
>
> R4#sir 11.1.1.1
> Routing entry for 11.0.0.0/8
>  Known via "bgp 200", distance 200, metric 0
>  Tag 100, type internal
>  Last update from 10.1.12.1 00:07:16 ago
>  Routing Descriptor Blocks:
>  * 10.1.12.1, from 10.1.23.2, 00:07:16 ago
>      Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
>      AS Hops 1
>      Route tag 100
>      MPLS label: none
> R4#sir 11.1.1.1 longer
> Codes: L - local, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
>       D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
>       N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
>       E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
>       i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
>       ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route
>       o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route, + - replicated route
>
> Gateway of last resort is not set
>
> B     11.0.0.0/8 [200/0] via 10.1.12.1, 00:07:32
> R4#
>
> show ip cef :
>
> R4#sh ip cef
> Prefix               Next Hop             Interface
> 0.0.0.0/0            no route
> 0.0.0.0/8            drop
> 0.0.0.0/32           receive
> 1.0.0.0/8            10.1.14.1            Ethernet0/0
> 2.0.0.0/8            10.1.34.3            Serial1/0.43
> 3.0.0.0/8            10.1.34.3            Serial1/0.43
> 4.0.0.0/8            attached             Loopback0
> 4.0.0.0/32           receive              Loopback0
> 4.4.4.4/32           receive              Loopback0
> 4.255.255.255/32     receive              Loopback0
> 10.1.12.0/24         10.1.14.1            Ethernet0/0
> 10.1.12.1/32         10.1.14.1            Ethernet0/0
> 10.1.14.0/24         attached             Ethernet0/0
> 10.1.14.0/32         receive              Ethernet0/0
> 10.1.14.1/32         attached             Ethernet0/0
> 10.1.14.4/32         receive              Ethernet0/0
> 10.1.14.255/32       receive              Ethernet0/0
> 10.1.23.0/24         10.1.34.3            Serial1/0.43
> 10.1.23.2/32         10.1.34.3            Serial1/0.43
> 10.1.34.0/24         attached             Serial1/0.43
> 10.1.34.0/32         receive              Serial1/0.43
> 10.1.34.3/32         10.1.34.3            Serial1/0.43
> Prefix               Next Hop             Interface
> 10.1.34.4/32         receive              Serial1/0.43
> 10.1.34.255/32       receive              Serial1/0.43
> 11.0.0.0/8           10.1.14.1            Ethernet0/0
> 127.0.0.0/8          drop
> 224.0.0.0/4          drop
> 224.0.0.0/24         receive
> 240.0.0.0/4          drop
> 255.255.255.255/32   receive
> R4#
>
> Traceroute :
> R4#trace 11.1.1.1
>
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Tracing the route to 11.1.1.1
>
>  1 10.1.14.1 4 msec *  0 msec
>
>
> Did the sh ip route 11.1.1.1, it showed 10.1.12.1 as the next hop. But the 
> cef listed the next hop to 10.1.14.1 (which is directly connected) rather 
> than 10.1.12.1 (few hops away) as commanded by Local-Pref.
> Absurd, still try to find what's goin on ... Let me know if i still missed 
> anything...
>
>
> Brgds
> Benny
>
>
>
>> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:32:50 +0530
>> From: [email protected]
>> To: [email protected]
>> CC: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Local Preference issue.
>>
>> Yes, it would be more specific route directing traffic towards 14.1 as we
>> believe. Can you check routing table and CEF table for the below one.
>>
>> show ip route 11.1.1.1
>> show ip cef ..
>>
>> venkee
>>
>> On 27 February 2012 00:26, Rob Pool <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > If it had the same route in an igp an r would show up because the BGP
>> > route would prevent it from being inserted in the rib. However, a more
>> > specific route in an igp wouldn't prevent the less specific BGP route from
>> > being inserted.
>> >
>> > Sent from my iPhone
>> >
>> > On Feb 26, 2012, at 1:49 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > If it had a more specific route from another protocol, wouldn't a "r"
>> > for "rib failure"show up for the route in the "sh ip bgp" command?
>> > >
>> > > Could an ICMP redirect from 10.1.12.1 is causing this?
>> > >
>> > > Doug
>> > > -------- Original Message --------
>> > > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Local Preference issue.
>> > > From: Rob Pool <[email protected]>
>> > > Date: Sun, February 26, 2012 10:41 am
>> > > To: Benny Sumardy <[email protected]>
>> > > Cc: CCIE ONLINE STUDY LIST <[email protected]>
>> > >
>> > > My guess would be that you have a more specific route being provided by
>> > an igp or static route.
>> > >
>> > > Sent from my iPhone
>> > >
>> > > On Feb 26, 2012, at 12:05 PM, Benny Sumardy <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Hi,
>> > > >
>> > > > Applied a local pref value for network 11.0.0.0 (as shown below), so
>> > the best route will prefer 10.1.12.1 (3 hops) than 10.1.14.1 (1 hop).
>> > > > But when I do a traceroute, the result still gone through 10.1.14.1.
>> > Can anybody help on what's missing here? Thanks
>> > > >
>> > > > Rgds
>> > > > Ben
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > R4(config-router)#do sib
>> > > > BGP table version is 7, local router ID is 4.4.4.4
>> > > > Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i -
>> > internal,
>> > > > r RIB-failure, S Stale
>> > > > Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
>> > > >
>> > > > Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
>> > > > *> 1.0.0.0 10.1.14.1 0 400 0 100 i
>> > > > *>i2.0.0.0 10.1.23.2 0 100 0 i
>> > > > *>i3.0.0.0 10.1.34.3 0 100 0 i
>> > > > *> 4.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i
>> > > > *>i11.0.0.0 10.1.12.1 0 400 0 100 i
>> > > > * 10.1.14.1 0 0 100 i
>> > > > R4(config-router)#do trace 11.1.1.1
>> > > >
>> > > > Type escape sequence to abort.
>> > > > Tracing the route to 11.1.1.1
>> > > >
>> > > > 1 10.1.14.1 12 msec * 0 msec
>> > > > R4(config-router)#do sir 11.0.0.0
>> > > > Routing entry for 11.0.0.0/8
>> > > > Known via "bgp 200", distance 200, metric 0
>> > > > Tag 100, type internal
>> > > > Last update from 10.1.12.1 00:01:14 ago
>> > > > Routing Descriptor Blocks:
>> > > > * 10.1.12.1, from 10.1.23.2, 00:01:14 ago
>> > > > Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
>> > > > AS Hops 1
>> > > > Route tag 100
>> > > > MPLS label: none
>> > > > R4(config-router)#
>> > > > R4(config-router)#do trace 11.1.1.1
>> > > >
>> > > > Type escape sequence to abort.
>> > > > Tracing the route to 11.1.1.1
>> > > >
>> > > > 1 10.1.14.1 4 msec * 4 msec
>> > > > R4(config-router)#
>> > > >
>> > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> > please visit www.ipexpert.com
>> > > >
>> > > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> > www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>> > > >
>> > > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> > please visit www.ipexpert.com
>> > >
>> > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> > www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>> > >
>> > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> > visit www.ipexpert.com
>> >
>> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> > www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>> >
>> > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>
>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs



-- 
// Freedom Matters
// CCIE #29189
// www.packet-forwarding.net
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs

Reply via email to