Match the VLANs used on the Router "encaps dot1q 120" and the Switch VLAN 120 not VLAN 99.
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:00 AM, <[email protected]>wrote: > Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Sub-interface problem (Sean James Gealon) > 2. Re: Sub-interface problem (Chad Uretsky) > 3. Re: Sub-interface problem (Nick Bonifacio) > 4. Re: Sub-interface problem (Chad Uretsky) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 08:10:04 -0700 (PDT) > From: Sean James Gealon <[email protected]> > To: IPExpert Online <[email protected]> > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Sub-interface problem > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > Hi, > > ? ? I just want to ask if anyone had experience on Fastethernet > sub-interface problem? > > ? ? I have fa0/0 which has a configuration of: > > ?interface FastEthernet0/0 > ?no ip address > ?duplex auto > ?speed auto > ! > interface FastEthernet0/0.77 > ?encapsulation dot1Q 77 > ?ip address 20.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 > ! > interface FastEthernet0/0.120 > ?encapsulation dot1Q 120 > ?ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 > > ?---------------- > > Router(config)#do sh ip int br > Interface ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?IP-Address ? ? ?OK? Method Status ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ?Protocol > FastEthernet0/0 ? ? ? ? ? ?unassigned ? ? ?YES TFTP ? up ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ?up ? ? ? > FastEthernet0/0.77 ? ? ? ? 20.1.1.1 ? ? ? ? YES NVRAM ?up ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > up ? ? ? > FastEthernet0/0.120 ? ? ? 10.1.1.1 ? ? ? ? ? YES manual up ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ? ?up ? ? ? > > > As you can see on the output everything is running fine, interfaces are up. > Now on the fa0/0.120 (10.1.1.1) it is connected to a switch f0/1. > on the switch also it is configured with vlan 99 with ip address of > 10.1.1.2 > > when I try to ping from router to switch using the fa0/0.120 (10.1.1.1) > the output is down. > but when I configure the ip address 10.1.1.1 of the router into the f0/0 > interface (not the sub-interface) > the ping is successful. > > > ? ?Any advice? > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 08:21:09 -0700 (PDT) > From: Chad Uretsky <[email protected]> > To: Sean James Gealon <[email protected]>, IPExpert Online > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Sub-interface problem > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > Sean, > > The interface on the switch needs to be configured as an 802.1q trunk in > order for this to work.? Have you verified that the switch port is > trunking?? It sounds like you have it configured as an access port.? Also, > as routers don't run DTP, you will have to manually set the switch port in > trunk mode. > > > Kind regards, > Chad Uretsky > > > > > >________________________________ > > From: Sean James Gealon <[email protected]> > >To: IPExpert Online <[email protected]> > >Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 10:10 AM > >Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Sub-interface problem > > > >Hi, > > > >? ? I just want to ask if anyone had experience on Fastethernet > sub-interface problem? > > > >? ? I have fa0/0 which has a configuration of: > > > >?interface FastEthernet0/0 > >?no ip address > >?duplex auto > >?speed auto > >! > >interface FastEthernet0/0.77 > >?encapsulation dot1Q 77 > >?ip address 20.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 > >! > >interface FastEthernet0/0.120 > >?encapsulation dot1Q 120 > >?ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 > > > >?---------------- > > > >Router(config)#do sh ip int br > >Interface ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?IP-Address ? ? ?OK? Method Status ? ? ? ? ? ? > ? ?Protocol > >FastEthernet0/0 ? ? ? ? ? ?unassigned ? ? ?YES TFTP ? up ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ? ?up ? ? ? > >FastEthernet0/0.77 ? ? ? ? 20.1.1.1 ? ? ? ? YES NVRAM ?up ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > up ? ? ? > >FastEthernet0/0.120 ? ? ? 10.1.1.1 ? ? ? ? ? YES manual up ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ? ? ?up ? ? ? > > > > > >As you can see on the output everything is running fine, interfaces are > up. > >Now on the fa0/0.120 (10.1.1.1) it is connected to a switch f0/1. > >on the switch also it is configured with vlan 99 with ip address of > 10.1.1.2 > > > >when I try to ping from router to switch using the fa0/0.120 (10.1.1.1) > the output is down. > >but when I configure the ip address 10.1.1.1 of the router into the f0/0 > interface (not the sub-interface) > >the ping is successful. > > > > > >? ?Any advice? > >_______________________________________________ > >For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > >Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> > > > >http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 08:23:11 -0700 (PDT) > From: Nick Bonifacio <[email protected]> > To: Sean James Gealon <[email protected]>, IPExpert Online > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Sub-interface problem > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > James, can I see the switch config? > ? > vlan99 10.1.1.2 svi is going to be in vlan 99 > ? > 10.1.1.1 on your router is going to be in vlan 120 > ? > don't you want these to be in the same vlan and same subnet?? > ? > ? > thanks, > Nick > > ________________________________ > From: Sean James Gealon <[email protected]> > To: IPExpert Online <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 11:10 AM > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Sub-interface problem > > Hi, > > ? ? I just want to ask if anyone had experience on Fastethernet > sub-interface problem? > > ? ? I have fa0/0 which has a configuration of: > > ?interface FastEthernet0/0 > ?no ip address > ?duplex auto > ?speed auto > ! > interface FastEthernet0/0.77 > ?encapsulation dot1Q 77 > ?ip address 20.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 > ! > interface FastEthernet0/0.120 > ?encapsulation dot1Q 120 > ?ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 > > ?---------------- > > Router(config)#do sh ip int br > Interface ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?IP-Address ? ? ?OK? Method Status ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ?Protocol > FastEthernet0/0 ? ? ? ? ? ?unassigned ? ? ?YES TFTP ? up ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ?up ? ? ? > FastEthernet0/0.77 ? ? ? ? 20.1.1.1 ? ? ? ? YES NVRAM ?up ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > up ? ? ? > FastEthernet0/0.120 ? ? ? 10.1.1.1 ? ? ? ? ? YES manual up ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ? ?up ? ? ? > > > As you can see on the output everything is running fine, interfaces are up. > Now on the fa0/0.120 (10.1.1.1) it is connected to a switch f0/1. > on the switch also it is configured with vlan 99 with ip address of > 10.1.1.2 > > when I try to ping from router to switch using the fa0/0.120 (10.1.1.1) > the output is down. > but when I configure the ip address 10.1.1.1 of the router into the f0/0 > interface (not the sub-interface) > the ping is successful. > > > ? ?Any advice? > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit http://www.ipexpert.com/ > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > http://www.platinumplacement.com/ > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 08:24:15 -0700 (PDT) > From: Chad Uretsky <[email protected]> > To: Sean James Gealon <[email protected]>, IPExpert Online > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Sub-interface problem > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > One other thing I forgot...you'll need to match your SVI to the VLAN on > the router.? For 10.1.1.1/10.1.1.2 to communicate, 10.1.1.2 will need to > be assigned to an SVI for VLAN 120, not VLAN 99, based on your router > config. > > Chad > > > > > >________________________________ > > From: Chad Uretsky <[email protected]> > >To: Sean James Gealon <[email protected]>; IPExpert Online < > [email protected]> > >Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 10:21 AM > >Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Sub-interface problem > > > >Sean, > > > >The interface on the switch needs to be configured as an 802.1q trunk in > order for this to work.? Have you verified that the switch port is > trunking?? It sounds like you have it configured as an access port.? Also, > as routers don't run DTP, you will have to manually set the switch port in > trunk mode. > > > > > >Kind regards, > >Chad Uretsky > > > > > > > > > >>________________________________ > >> From: Sean James Gealon <[email protected]> > >>To: IPExpert Online <[email protected]> > >>Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 10:10 AM > >>Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Sub-interface problem > >> > >>Hi, > >> > >>? ? I just want to ask if anyone had experience on Fastethernet > sub-interface problem? > >> > >>? ? I have fa0/0 which has a configuration of: > >> > >>?interface FastEthernet0/0 > >>?no ip address > >>?duplex auto > >>?speed auto > >>! > >>interface FastEthernet0/0.77 > >>?encapsulation dot1Q 77 > >>?ip address 20.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 > >>! > >>interface FastEthernet0/0.120 > >>?encapsulation dot1Q 120 > >>?ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 > >> > >>?---------------- > >> > >>Router(config)#do sh ip int br > >>Interface ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?IP-Address ? ? ?OK? Method Status ? ? ? ? ? ? > ? ?Protocol > >>FastEthernet0/0 ? ? ? ? ? ?unassigned ? ? ?YES TFTP ? up ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ? ?up ? ? ? > >>FastEthernet0/0.77 ? ? ? ? 20.1.1.1 ? ? ? ? YES NVRAM ?up ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ? up ? ? ? > >>FastEthernet0/0.120 ? ? ? 10.1.1.1 ? ? ? ? ? YES manual up ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ? ? ?up ? ? ? > >> > >> > >>As you can see on the output everything is running fine, interfaces are > up. > >>Now on the fa0/0.120 (10.1.1.1) it is connected to a switch f0/1. > >>on the switch also it is configured with vlan 99 with ip address of > 10.1.1.2 > >> > >>when I try to ping from router to switch using the fa0/0.120 (10.1.1.1) > the output is down. > >>but when I configure the ip address 10.1.1.1 of the router into the f0/0 > interface (not the sub-interface) > >>the ping is successful. > >> > >> > >>? ?Any advice? > >>_______________________________________________ > >>For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > please visit www.ipexpert.com > >> > >>Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> > >> > >>http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > >> > >> > >> > >_______________________________________________ > >For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > >Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> > > > >http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > > > > > > > > End of CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 77, Issue 51 > *************************************** > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
