Hi Tom,That did not work unfortunately. I had the host pool tied into a client-id, which worked a dream when the virtual template was not in a VRF. Put the VT in the VRF, and the pool in the VRF, it would only allocate from the main "network command" pool and not from the host pool. What you say would make utter sense of course, and is perhaps the way things should work. Just wonder if I've hit an infamous 12.4T bug???? I don't think it was a PEBKAC error!! If have time, may try and re-create the error George. Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 23:19:01 -0500 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] PE DHCP Pools per VRF From: [email protected] To: [email protected] CC: [email protected]
I'm not 100% sure as I didn't get to that lab, but I think the one piece of information that would help is that host pools inherit their other properties from the network pool that the host ip matches. For instance if you have a pool for 10.10.0.0/24 and a host pool 10.10.2.2, that host pool will inherit any settings of the network pool 10.10.0.0/24. I'm guessing that the VRF configuration would also be inherited, that's why you need the network pool and the host pool together. Hope that helps. Tom On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 5:25 PM, George Leslie <[email protected]> wrote: Hi all, Another thing I came across in Wb3 Lab 7 today. This consumed a lot of time when I did the lab today, but I did not mind as it was a great learning scenario. The task is to configure PPPoE on a subnet. Client requests ip address via DHCP, with a pool on the PPPoE server. Usual scenario of making sure that your one known client gets the proper IP address, while allowing for others. Now, DSG has solution of following format: ip dhcp pool R8 host 10.8.45.8 255.255.255.0 client-id <mac of r8> ip dhcp pool OTHERS network 10.8.45.0 /24 int virtual-template 1 peer default ip address dhcp-pool R8 Firstly, wouldn’t tying the virtual-template to the R8 pool mean that ONLY one device can get an IP address from this virtual template as pool OTHERS is not used? When I was doing this in the lab, I thought I’d save time and put the virtual-template in the VRF up front. This caused no end of problems! You cannot use the “vrf” keyword in a host pool. You can in the OTHERS pool. I had “peer default ip address dhcp” configured at the time. I had to resort to the DSG to get a working solution, but I am not convinced the solution satisfied the lab requirement. This leads to a more general question: How do you tie a DHCP pool to a VRF? Is it with the VRF keyword under the pool? If so, you cannot configure the vrf keyword under the host pool, so how do you associate host pools with a VRF? Let’s say you have 2 clients, each with hard coded MAC address 0000.0000.0001, in 2 different VRFs. They have to be assigned different known IP addresses, via DHCP, in two different VRFs, along with other general clients in both VRFs. How would you do that? Regards, George. _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
