I looked over the lab and I agree with you. It indicates that the link
between BB1 and R1 should be in area 100. R1 obviously doesn't have any
config to be in OSPF so you won't see a peering. I think this is probably
an oversight.

Make sure you know the concept and move on.

-Marc Abel
CCIE #35470

On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Matt McAdory <[email protected]> wrote:

> Question:
>
> How can routes be sent to BB1 if BB1 does not have an OSPF process?
>
> Config downloaded from website for BB1:
>
> version 12.4
> service timestamps debug datetime msec
> service timestamps log datetime msec
> no service password-encryption
> !
> hostname CoreTech-BB1
> !
> boot-start-marker
> boot-end-marker
> !
> !
> no aaa new-model
> memory-size iomem 15
> !
> !
> ip cef
> !
> !
> no ip domain lookup
> !
> interface FastEthernet0/0
>  ip address 100.100.100.100 255.255.255.0
>  half-duplex
>  no shut
> !
> line con 0
>  exec-timeout 0 0
>  logging synchronous
> line aux 0
> line vty 0 4
>  login
> !
> scheduler allocate 20000 1000
> !
> end
>
>
> I understand the DSG's explanation of the summary and it's placement,
> but those routes do not get to BB1. NO routes get to BB1 with the
> initial config for the task. If BB1 is out of the student's control, I
> do not know how I can get the routes there and still abide by the
> constraints of the lab. Is this an error or my misguided
> interpretation?
>
> Matt
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>



-- 
Marc Abel
CCIE #35470
(Routing and Switching)
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs

Reply via email to