hi Guys which books can you recommend for switching in the R&S track ..??
________________________________ From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, October 3, 2012 1:44 AM Subject: CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 81, Issue 3 Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [email protected] You can reach the person managing the list at [email protected] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Question about Multicast PIM-SM (Jaris Aizprua) 2. OPSF adjacency - network p2m and p2m-nb (Fulvio allegretti) 3. PASSED LAB 5 (armoura dsouza) 4. Re: Question about Multicast PIM-SM (Bal Birdy) 5. Re: Question about Multicast PIM-SM (Bal Birdy) 6. Re: Question about Multicast PIM-SM (Bal Birdy) 7. Re: PASSED LAB 5 (Joe Sanchez) 8. Re: PASSED LAB 5 (Bob McCouch) 9. Re: PASSED LAB 5 (Edgar Mauricio Diaz Orellana) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 12:08:33 -0500 From: Jaris Aizprua <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Question about Multicast PIM-SM Message-ID: <CAF4x_nJZk==srgmirmwm-2pqcv+8sn2sqmesfrd2m2nvxuj...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello everybody, I have the next doubt related to Multicast PIM-SM: * Once the source and destination have been discovered by the RP, the shared tree must be merged, therefore: -> Which entry should be installed by the routers in the transit path (between PIM-DR and RP) in their multicast routing table? (*,G) or (S,G) or both? Thanks!!! ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 18:22:24 +0000 From: Fulvio allegretti <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] OPSF adjacency - network p2m and p2m-nb Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" I bet this question has been posted many times. assuming multicast is not blocked and the interface can do mulitcast, ospf relationship between opsf network p2m and p2m-nb works, i got it labbed up and I can?t see a problem with it. Is this right? Apart from show run is there anyway to see that an interface is in p2m-nb; show ip ospf inter tells me that the interface is Network Type POINT_TO_MULTIPOINT. Many thanks Fulvio R6#sh ip ospf neig Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address Interface 136.10.2.2 0 FULL/ - 00:01:56 136.10.100.2 Serial0/3/0 R6#sh run int se 0/3/0 Building configuration... Current configuration : 354 bytes ! interface Serial0/3/0 ip address 136.10.100.6 255.255.255.224 encapsulation frame-relay ip summary-address eigrp 100 100.10.0.0 255.255.240.0 5 ip ospf network point-to-multipoint non-broadcast frame-relay map ip 136.10.100.5 602 frame-relay map ip 136.10.100.6 602 frame-relay map ip 136.10.100.2 602 broadcast no frame-relay inverse-arp end R6#sh ip ospf inter Loopback0 is up, line protocol is up Internet Address 136.10.6.6/24, Area 0 - Ignored: Process ID 1, Router ID 136.10.6.6, Network Type LOOPBACK, Cost: 1 Loopback interface is treated as a stub Host Serial0/3/0 is up, line protocol is up Internet Address 136.10.100.6/27, Area 0 Process ID 1, Router ID 136.10.6.6, Network Type POINT_TO_MULTIPOINT, Cost: 64 Transmit Delay is 1 sec, State POINT_TO_MULTIPOINT Timer intervals configured, Hello 30, Dead 120, Wait 120, Retransmit 5 oob-resync timeout 120 Hello due in 00:00:00 Supports Link-local Signaling (LLS) Cisco NSF helper support enabled IETF NSF helper support enabled Index 1/1, flood queue length 0 Next 0x0(0)/0x0(0) Last flood scan length is 4, maximum is 4 Last flood scan time is 0 msec, maximum is 0 msec Neighbor Count is 1, Adjacent neighbor count is 1 Adjacent with neighbor 136.10.2.2 Suppress hello for 0 neighbor(s) R6# R2#sh ip ospf neig Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address Interface 136.10.6.6 0 FULL/ - 00:01:52 136.10.100.6 Serial1/1.256 R2#sh run int se 1/1.256 Building configuration... Current configuration : 335 bytes ! interface Serial1/1.256 multipoint ip address 136.10.100.2 255.255.255.224 ip ospf network point-to-multipoint frame-relay de-group 1 205 frame-relay de-group 1 206 frame-relay map ip 136.10.100.2 206 frame-relay map ip 136.10.100.6 206 broadcast frame-relay map ip 136.10.100.5 205 broadcast service-policy output FRAG end R2#sh ip ospf inter Loopback0 is up, line protocol is up Internet Address 136.10.2.2/24, Area 0 Process ID 1, Router ID 136.10.2.2, Network Type LOOPBACK, Cost: 1 Loopback interface is treated as a stub Host Serial1/1.256 is up, line protocol is up Internet Address 136.10.100.2/27, Area 0 Process ID 1, Router ID 136.10.2.2, Network Type POINT_TO_MULTIPOINT, Cost: 64 Transmit Delay is 1 sec, State POINT_TO_MULTIPOINT Timer intervals configured, Hello 30, Dead 120, Wait 120, Retransmit 5 oob-resync timeout 120 Hello due in 00:00:17 Supports Link-local Signaling (LLS) Cisco NSF helper support enabled IETF NSF helper support enabled Index 1/1, flood queue length 0 Next 0x0(0)/0x0(0) Last flood scan length is 1, maximum is 1 Last flood scan time is 0 msec, maximum is 0 msec Neighbor Count is 1, Adjacent neighbor count is 1 Adjacent with neighbor 136.10.6.6 Suppress hello for 0 neighbor(s) R2# ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 01:30:18 +0530 From: armoura dsouza <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] PASSED LAB 5 Message-ID: <CABMZdJwu1fsxmBgW6e3LhvN=jqj36zytv2+v4o_p3m4gfso...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Let us know if anyone is interested to do lab 5 I just cleared that thanks thanks to everyone... lab 5 is easy :) ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 08:28:57 +1000 From: Bal Birdy <[email protected]> To: Jaris Aizprua <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Question about Multicast PIM-SM Message-ID: <cafk19xwibydvvlswd+k2g8vqu17sqvtqqrgpz1acap1kxf1...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 (*,g) with reference to the rp. Cisco defaults to (s,g) after learning source after first packet. This is spt switchover. You can adjust the number of packets/amount of data before switchover On Oct 3, 2012 3:17 AM, "Jaris Aizprua" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I have the next doubt related to Multicast PIM-SM: > > * Once the source and destination have been discovered by the RP, the > shared tree must be merged, therefore: > > -> Which entry should be installed by the routers in the transit path > (between PIM-DR and RP) in their multicast routing table? (*,G) or (S,G) or > both? > > Thanks!!! > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 08:30:49 +1000 From: Bal Birdy <[email protected]> To: Jaris Aizprua <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Question about Multicast PIM-SM Message-ID: <cafk19xz6beri4rhcwdq2mbux1gg8pcgskapkzr56ekc5j+x...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Oops I was talking about edge router but I believe this should be true for all routers who have pim joined to receive the mcast traffic On Oct 3, 2012 8:28 AM, "Bal Birdy" <[email protected]> wrote: > (*,g) with reference to the rp. Cisco defaults to (s,g) after learning > source after first packet. This is spt switchover. You can adjust the > number of packets/amount of data before switchover > On Oct 3, 2012 3:17 AM, "Jaris Aizprua" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello everybody, >> >> I have the next doubt related to Multicast PIM-SM: >> >> * Once the source and destination have been discovered by the RP, the >> shared tree must be merged, therefore: >> >> -> Which entry should be installed by the routers in the transit path >> (between PIM-DR and RP) in their multicast routing table? (*,G) or (S,G) >> or >> both? >> >> Thanks!!! >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >> > ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 08:36:21 +1000 From: Bal Birdy <[email protected]> To: Jaris Aizprua <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Question about Multicast PIM-SM Message-ID: <CAFK19xxfq=jwqbz74no2apf_65pg9ktdeqq+xw0nj7r1vz6...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Quick google and as I originally thought edge router only. Everyone else sparse mode On Oct 3, 2012 8:30 AM, "Bal Birdy" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Oops I was talking about edge router but I believe this should be true for all routers who have pim joined to receive the mcast traffic > > On Oct 3, 2012 8:28 AM, "Bal Birdy" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> (*,g) with reference to the rp. Cisco defaults to (s,g) after learning source after first packet. This is spt switchover. You can adjust the number of packets/amount of data before switchover >> >> On Oct 3, 2012 3:17 AM, "Jaris Aizprua" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hello everybody, >>> >>> I have the next doubt related to Multicast PIM-SM: >>> >>> * Once the source and destination have been discovered by the RP, the >>> shared tree must be merged, therefore: >>> >>> -> Which entry should be installed by the routers in the transit path >>> (between PIM-DR and RP) in their multicast routing table? (*,G) or (S,G) or >>> both? >>> >>> Thanks!!! >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com >>> >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>> >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 18:07:11 -0500 From: Joe Sanchez <[email protected]> To: armoura dsouza <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] PASSED LAB 5 Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Armoura, lab5?? Regards, Joe Sanchez ( please excuse the brevity of this email as it was sent via a mobile device. Please excuse misspelled words or sentence structure.) On Oct 2, 2012, at 3:00 PM, armoura dsouza <[email protected]> wrote: > Let us know if anyone is interested to do lab 5 I just cleared that thanks > > thanks to everyone... lab 5 is easy :) > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 19:28:17 -0400 From: Bob McCouch <[email protected]> To: Joe Sanchez <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] PASSED LAB 5 Message-ID: <-8271366171301718750@unknownmsgid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Dump spam I'm sure. Bob -- Sent from my iPhone, please excuse any typos. On Oct 2, 2012, at 7:07 PM, Joe Sanchez <[email protected]> wrote: > Armoura, lab5?? > > Regards, > Joe Sanchez > > ( please excuse the brevity of this email as it was sent via a mobile > device. Please excuse misspelled words or sentence structure.) > > On Oct 2, 2012, at 3:00 PM, armoura dsouza <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Let us know if anyone is interested to do lab 5 I just cleared that thanks >> >> thanks to everyone... lab 5 is easy :) >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs ------------------------------ Message: 9 Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 19:44:57 -0400 From: Edgar Mauricio Diaz Orellana <[email protected]> To: Bob McCouch <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] PASSED LAB 5 Message-ID: <cap_qrv5ilvgc6yv_bpfw2+xzlahymvpshw4uz0jy1ucqd4v...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 DumpSh*t.... i'll bet this is only bulls**t. On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Bob McCouch <[email protected]> wrote: > Dump spam I'm sure. > > Bob > -- > Sent from my iPhone, please excuse any typos. > > On Oct 2, 2012, at 7:07 PM, Joe Sanchez <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Armoura, lab5?? > > > > Regards, > > Joe Sanchez > > > > ( please excuse the brevity of this email as it was sent via a mobile > device. Please excuse misspelled words or sentence structure.) > > > > On Oct 2, 2012, at 3:00 PM, armoura dsouza <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Let us know if anyone is interested to do lab 5 I just cleared that > thanks > >> > >> thanks to everyone... lab 5 is easy :) > >> _______________________________________________ > >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > please visit www.ipexpert.com > >> > >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > >> > >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > > _______________________________________________ > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > please visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > -- Edgar D?az Orellana CCENT/CCNA/CCNA Security, CCNP en progreso, CCSP pausado. Kaspersky Administrator / Technical Specialist Microsoft Certified Professional. Celular : 09-94118996 skype: eorellan1969 End of CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 81, Issue 3 ************************************** _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
