Probably need to use MP BGP and leak routes from one VRF to the other that way. You can selectively redistribute using route-maps in BGP, or I've also done it using import-maps or export-maps and setting specific RTs for the routes to be leaked.
I've heard of another way too (someone was just asking about this on OSL a couple weeks ago) but not remembering it. Bob -- Sent from my iPhone, please excuse any typos. On Oct 5, 2012, at 1:50 PM, "Bodnar, Edward" <[email protected]> wrote: > They are not in the vrf. But question I am asking myself is this how to I > advertise the connected routes out both VRF's? I can only put the interface > in one VRF. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bob McCouch [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 1:47 PM > To: Bodnar, Edward > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] EIGRP VRF issue > > I was wondering that. How about the connected routes? If the interface > isn't in the VRF, the connected route wouldn't be either, it would be > in the global. Do the connected routes show under 'sh ip route VRF > blah'? > > Bob > -- > Sent from my iPhone, please excuse any typos. > > On Oct 5, 2012, at 1:36 PM, "Bodnar, Edward" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Interesting I figured part of this out. My static routes did not have a >> valid next hop so they were missing my fa1/0 int was not configured :( .... >> Still need to figure out the connected route part. Gotta be something >> simple. >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Bob McCouch [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 1:10 PM >> To: Bodnar, Edward >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] EIGRP VRF issue >> >> Seems like a dumb thing to ask, but the connected interfaces and >> static routes are in that VRF, not the global routing table, right? >> >> And you're setting a seed metric through a "default-metric" statement, >> specifying on the redistribution line, or setting with a route-map, >> right? >> >> Bob >> -- >> Sent from my iPhone, please excuse any typos. >> >> On Oct 5, 2012, at 12:47 PM, "Bodnar, Edward" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Question to all . Working in my lab and playing with VRF's and >>> redistribution. I am having an issue with redistributing connected or >>> static into my EIGRP VRF. I get an eigrp neighbor relationship with >>> downstream devices. I can see routes if there not connected or static. >>> Just those 2 key words not working, Not showing up in eigrp top table so >>> the issue is there just not getting into eigrp at all. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Config attached. : >>> >>> >>> >>> router eigrp 100 >>> >>> redistribute connected >>> >>> no auto-summary >>> >>> ! >>> >>> address-family ipv4 vrf NEX2 >>> >>> redistribute connected metric 1000 100 255 1 1500 >>> >>> redistribute static metric 1000 100 255 1 1500 >>> >>> network 123.123.123.0 0.0.0.255 >>> >>> network 0.0.0.0 >>> >>> no auto-summary >>> >>> autonomous-system 100 >>> >>> exit-address-family >>> >>> ! >>> >>> address-family ipv4 vrf NEX1 >>> >>> redistribute connected metric 1000 100 255 1 1500 >>> >>> redistribute static metric 1000 100 255 1 1500 >>> >>> network 123.123.123.0 0.0.0.255 >>> >>> network 177.177.177.0 0.0.0.255 >>> >>> network 0.0.0.0 >>> >>> no auto-summary >>> >>> autonomous-system 100 >>> >>> exit-address-family >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>> >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>> >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
