Ok sorry, just seen *Known via "eigrp 1001", distance 170, metric 1308160, type external*
so it is known via 1001 ok understand that we have mutual redistribution here... Redistributing via eigrp 2004, eigrp 1001 then why does it say * * * Advertised by eigrp 2004* ? is that because of "as well" On 27 October 2012 01:08, Tony Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > > R2 mutual redistribution between AS1001 & AS2004 > > why would we not see the route from AS1001 ? > > R2#show ip eigrp top all-links | s 200.0.0.1 > P 200.0.0.1/32, 1 successors, FD is 1308160, serno 5 > via Redistributed (1308160/0) > P 200.0.0.1/32, 1 successors, FD is 1308160, serno 5 > via 150.100.12.1 (1308160/1280256), FastEthernet0/0 > via 150.100.100.5 (42306560/21794560), Serial0/2/1.256 > > > but we're seeing it from AS2004 instead ? > > R2#show ip route 200.0.0.1 > Routing entry for 200.0.0.1/32 > Known via "eigrp 1001", distance 170, metric 1308160, type external > Redistributing via eigrp 2004, eigrp 1001 > * Advertised by eigrp 2004* > Last update from 150.100.12.1 on FastEthernet0/0, 01:02:53 ago > Routing Descriptor Blocks: > * 150.100.12.1, from 150.100.12.1, 01:02:53 ago, via FastEthernet0/0 > Route metric is 1308160, traffic share count is 1 > Total delay is 50100 microseconds, minimum bandwidth is 100000 Kbit > Reliability 255/255, minimum MTU 1500 bytes > Loading 1/255, Hops 1 > > > > route originates from external eigrp 170 with redistribution command > within the same autonomous system AS1001 (R1) > > > P 200.0.0.1/32, 1 successors, FD is 1308160, serno 5 > via Redistributed (1308160/*0)* > > > The advertised distance of* 0* indicates the raw route from R1 AS1001 > right? > > Then why is AS2004 preferred ? > > > router eigrp 2004 > redistribute eigrp 1001 > default-metric 1 1 1 1 1 > > router eigrp 1001 > redistribute eigrp 2004 > default-metric 1 1 1 1 1 > > > Am i missing something when it says advertised by * *eigrp 2004 ? > > > Tony > > > > > On 26 October 2012 23:49, Tony Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > >> It says that AS6009 should be preferred, so >> >> r6 >> router eigrp 1001 >> redistribute eigrp 6009 >> default-metric 10000 1000 255 1 1500 >> >> router eigrp 6009 >> redistribute eigrp 1001 >> default-metric 10000 1000 255 1 1500 >> >> so routes from r6's perspective from other connected As's see the route >> from 6009, is that it? >> >> example of r1's loopback >> >> R6#show ip route 200.0.0.1 >> Routing entry for 200.0.0.1/32 >> Known via "eigrp 1001", distance 170, metric 41794560, type external >> Redistributing via eigrp 1001, eigrp 6009 >> *Advertised by eigrp 6009* >> Last update from 150.100.100.2 on Serial0/1/0, 00:18:52 ago >> Routing Descriptor Blocks: >> * 150.100.100.2, from 150.100.100.2, 00:18:52 ago, via Serial0/1/0 >> Route metric is 41794560, traffic share count is 1 >> Total delay is 70100 microseconds, minimum bandwidth is 64 Kbit >> Reliability 255/255, minimum MTU 1500 bytes >> Loading 1/255, Hops 2 >> >> >> what about from other routers perspective? checked and they obv see best >> networks from their own AS >> >> this is expected i guess as they know not of other AS's tho those AS >> routes have been redistributed into their own AS1001 - but not 100% clear >> in DSG & video >> >> Sorry for being a thicko Marko but I don't see it as black and white! >> >> BR >> >> Tony >> >> >> >> On 26 October 2012 18:13, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> What did the video solution say? >>> >>> -- >>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S) >>> Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Tony Singh <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > Can anyone help on this please >>> > >>> > -- >>> > BR >>> > >>> > Sent from my iPhone on 3 >>> > >>> > On 26 Oct 2012, at 03:07, Tony Singh <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> in this task it asks that AS 6009 is preferred after all is said and >>> done, ok so we have a better seed metric on r6 for this for both eigrp >>> processes. >>> >> >>> >> now im getting confused on "where" exactly AS6009 should show up as >>> being preferred? >>> >> >>> >> thanks in advance >>> >> >>> >> Tony >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>> > >>> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>> > >>> > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>> >> > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
