Asynchronous routing, there may design considerations where this is suboptimal. Depends on scenario On Nov 24, 2012 3:56 PM, "Anthony Jones" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello All, > > > I am wanting to verify my thoughts on a bgp design and could use some from > peers. I have a design that involves two autonomous systems. R1 and R2 > are in AS 120 and R3 and R4 are in AS 340. R1 peers with R3 and R2 peers > with R4. OSPF is the IGP and is redistributing BGP learned routes. The part > that is interesting in the design is that there are no iBGP peerings within > the Autonomous Systems. Now, I know this design works just fine but I want > to ensure that I am not overlooking any obvious reasons to steer away from > this. Can anyone think of any justifications to create iBGP peerings > here? Thanks in advance. > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
