On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Yuri Bank <[email protected]> wrote:
> Each (S,G) has multiple timers, outgoing interface list that may be > constantly changing etc.... Overall, an entry in the mroute table could > require a lot of overhead in the control-plane. A BGP route on the other > hand is basically stateless, a prefix is learned and installed into the > RIB, nothing else happens with it until the neighbor it was learned from > goes down or an update is received. > > -YuriB > > > > > On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 2:45 AM, Adesh Chaudhary < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Folks, >> >> The amount of State information (especially S,G) seems like a big concern, >> when I am referring to Multicast texts / trainings. >> I am unable to understand why? I mean Unicast routing table can handle >> full >> BGP prefix information. Then why is "Large amount of Multicast State >> information (S,G) considered such a big deal"? >> Can't the Multicast table handle it? OR What? >> >> Please let me know about your views on this. I am not able to get it. >> >> -- >> Thanks & Regards, >> Adesh >> +91 99996 10511 (Delhi) >> +91 99860 10511 (Bangalore) >> >> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >> >> _______________________________________________________________________ >> Subscription information may be found at: >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Thanks Yuri, Agreed to your point regarding maintenance operations on MROUTE table. Now I get it better. Cheers! -- Thanks & Regards, Adesh +91 99996 10511 (Delhi) +91 99860 10511 (Banglore) _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
