What version of iOS are you running and on what platform. In some of the older versions you have to enable MPLS globally before label exchange will happen.
Also, have you tried setting you MPLS ldp router I'd to fa0/0? Could be a problem with your loop back address. If this is a practice lab, another interface on another router could be advertising a longer match like 4.4.4.4/24. Just one of those sneaky lab tricks :) Respectfully, Ryan Krcelic CCIE #38087 Sent from my iPhone On Jun 20, 2013, at 3:23 AM, isaac mukhwana <[email protected]> wrote: > > > IS THERE A WAY THIS ERROR CAN BE RESOLVED?? I DID AN MPLS LDP ROUTER-ID Lo0 > WHICH WORKED ON ANOTHER ROUTER BUT THE ERROR PERSISTS HERE, I HAVE ALSO > CONFIRMED THAT MY Lo0 INTEFACE IS UP UP AND REACHABLE > > > > ROUTER OSPF 2 VRF CUST-A > %VRF specified does not match this router > > > ip cef > no ip domain lookup > ! > ! > ip vrf CUST-A > rd 1:100 > route-target export 1:100 > route-target import 1:100 > ! > ip vrf CUST-B > rd 1:200 > route-target export 1:200 > route-target import 1:200 > ! > multilink bundle-name authenticated > mpls label range 400 499 > mpls label protocol ldp > mpls ldp advertise-labels for 1 > > ! > ! > interface Loopback0 > ip address 4.4.4.4 255.0.0.0 > ip ospf network point-to-point > ip ospf 1 area 0 > ! > interface Loopback1 > ip address 44.44.44.44 255.255.0.0 > ! > interface FastEthernet0/0 > ip address 192.1.34.4 255.255.255.0 > ip ospf 1 area 0 > duplex auto > speed auto > mpls ip > ! > interface FastEthernet0/1 > ip vrf forwarding CUST-B > ip address 192.1.47.4 255.255.255.0 > duplex auto > speed auto > ! > interface FastEthernet1/0 > ip vrf forwarding CUST-A > ip address 192.1.48.4 255.255.255.0 > duplex auto > > router ospf 1 > router-id 4.4.4.4 > log-adjacency-changes > ! > router bgp 12353 > no synchronization > bgp log-neighbor-changes > network 44.44.0.0 mask 255.255.0.0 > neighbor 1.1.1.1 remote-as 12353 > neighbor 1.1.1.1 update-source Loopback0 > neighbor 1.1.1.1 next-hop-self > no auto-summary > ! > address-family vpnv4 > neighbor 1.1.1.1 activate > neighbor 1.1.1.1 send-community both > neighbor 1.1.1.1 next-hop-self > exit-address-family > ! > address-family ipv4 vrf CUST-B > no synchronization > exit-address-family > ! > address-family ipv4 vrf CUST-A > no synchronization > exit-address-family > ! > no ip http server > no ip http secure-server > ip forward-protocol nd > ! > ! > ! > access-list 1 permit 2.2.2.2 > access-list 1 permit 3.3.3.3 > access-list 1 permit 4.4.4.4 > access-list 1 permit 1.1.1.1 > ! > ! > mpls ldp router-id Loopback0 force > ! > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > From: "[email protected]" > <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 11:20 PM > Subject: CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 89, Issue 18 > > > Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: OSPF Q (Marko Milivojevic) > 2. MPLS ISSUE (isaac mukhwana) > 3. Re: MPLS ISSUE (Waqas Daar) > 4. Re: MPLS ISSUE (Steve Di Bias) > 5. Re: MPLS ISSUE (Ryan Krcelic) > 6. Re: MPLS ISSUE (Nick Bonifacio) > 7. Re: MPLS ISSUE (Bob McCouch) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:09:11 -0700 > From: Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> > To: Elie Raad <[email protected]> > Cc: OSL Routing and Switching <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] OSPF Q > Message-ID: > <cagdym0zdysatr-pp8j8kfpuqo84dhomawe35zm53q7fucto...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Well, you are mixing in two things here :-). The thread was originally > about the non-NSSA area. That's what I was answering about. > > In a case of the NSSA area, behavior is slightly different. NSSA ASBR will > set FA as the IP field to one of its own IP addresses advertised in OSPF > (preference given to Loopback). When the translating ABR creates Type 5 > LSA, this information will be preserved, allowing fo the optimal routing to > the ASBR. > > -- > Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S) > Senior CCIE Instructor / Managing Partner - IPexpert > > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Elie Raad <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I mean in scenario where we have 2 Exits to O E1/E2 routes , OSPF will >> choose to Replace the Advertising Router Attribute to the highest Router-id >> Value between Both . in that case OSPF will route toward the one that is >> matched inside the Advertising router value, this can cause sometimes >> sub-optimal routing issue. >> If the Forwarding Address value is set than OSPF will route toward the Fa >> address field regardless of the one who did the T 7/5 Translation ensuring >> Optimal path selection. >> >> what if this same route has been advertised but now with the Advertising >> router field set and the Fa field Set. and there is no Type 7/5 Translation >> since we Satisfied the below conditions for setting the FA to non-zero. the >> question is what will OSPF choose as a next hope to get this route >> installated in the RIB? >> >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> *Elie Raad | Network and Systems Administrator* >> *American University of Science and Technology* >> [email protected] | Office: +961-1-218716 Ext: 396 >> Office Hours: Mon- Fri 9:00 am-16:00 pm UTC+02:00 >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* Marko Milivojevic [[email protected]] >> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 18, 2013 11:27 PM >> *To:* Elie Raad >> *Cc:* Saleh Batouq; OSL Routing and Switching >> >> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] OSPF Q >> >> What would OSPF use as next-hop where? >> >> -- >> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S) >> Senior CCIE Instructor / Managing Partner - IPexpert >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Elie Raad <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> What will ospf use as a next hop , the advertising router ip address or >>> the fa address >>> >>> Ignore any typos, sent from mobile device. >>> >>> On Jun 18, 2013, at 19:17, "Marko Milivojevic" <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Yes it is :-) >>> >>> On an ASBR that redistributes the route: >>> >>> 1) next-hop must be known by OSPF (enabled on the interface, or a more >>> specific OSPF route to it) >>> 2) exit interface for the next-hop must not be passive >>> 3) exit interface must be broadcast or non-broadcast >>> >>> If those are satisfied, redistributed route will have non-zero FA and >>> FA will be the next-hop of the redistributed route. >>> >>> -- >>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S) >>> Senior CCIE Instructor / Managing Partner - IPexpert >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Saleh Batouq <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> I would also like to know!!! >>>> >>>> Best Regards, >>>> >>>> Saleh >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Elie Raad <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Guys , >>>>> >>>>> is it possible to set the FA Address to non-zero for an O E1/E2 route? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>>> please >>>>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>> >>>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>>> >>>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>>> >>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>> >>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:30:51 -0700 (PDT) > From: isaac mukhwana <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] MPLS ISSUE > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > WITH ROUTER 2 AND ROUTER 3 DIRECTLY CONNECTED ON THEIR FA0/0 PHYSICAL > INTERFACES, I CANNOT GET THEM TO FORM LDP NEIGHBORS, SHOW MPLS LDP > NEIGHBOR COMMAND LISTS NO NEIGHBOR. > AM I MISSING SOMETHING HERE?? > ROUTER 2 > > mpls label range 200 299 > mpls label protocol ldp > > > interface FastEthernet0/0 > ?ip address 192.1.23.2 255.255.255.0 > ?duplex auto > ?speed auto > ?mpls label protocol ldp > ?mpls ip > ! > > interface FastEthernet0/1 > ?ip address 192.1.12.2 255.255.255.0 > ?duplex auto > ?speed auto > ?mpls label protocol ldp > ?mpls ip > > ROUTER 3 > > mpls label range 300 399 > mpls label protocol ldp > ! > interface FastEthernet0/0 > ?ip address 192.1.23.3 255.255.255.0 > ?duplex auto > ?speed auto > ?mpls label protocol ldp > ?mpls ip > ! > > interface FastEthernet0/1 > ?ip address 192.1.34.3 255.255.255.0 > ?duplex auto > ?speed auto > ?mpls label protocol ldp > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:02:04 +0200 > From: Waqas Daar <[email protected]> > To: isaac mukhwana <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] MPLS ISSUE > Message-ID: > <CABBpaZXdhGF+VhEGmKj9Az+3bSPYT=qk370taqnfq3fymmv...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Did you enable ip cef on the router ? > > Regards, > > Waqas Daar > > > > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 6:30 PM, isaac mukhwana <[email protected]> wrote: > >> WITH ROUTER 2 AND ROUTER 3 DIRECTLY CONNECTED ON THEIR FA0/0 PHYSICAL >> INTERFACES, I CANNOT GET THEM TO FORM LDP NEIGHBORS, SHOW MPLS LDP >> NEIGHBOR COMMAND LISTS NO NEIGHBOR. >> AM I MISSING SOMETHING HERE?? >> ROUTER 2 >> >> mpls label range 200 299 >> mpls label protocol ldp >> >> >> interface FastEthernet0/0 >> ip address 192.1.23.2 255.255.255.0 >> duplex auto >> speed auto >> mpls label protocol ldp >> mpls ip >> ! >> >> interface FastEthernet0/1 >> ip address 192.1.12.2 255.255.255.0 >> duplex auto >> speed auto >> mpls label protocol ldp >> mpls ip >> >> ROUTER 3 >> >> mpls label range 300 399 >> mpls label protocol ldp >> ! >> interface FastEthernet0/0 >> ip address 192.1.23.3 255.255.255.0 >> duplex auto >> speed auto >> mpls label protocol ldp >> mpls ip >> ! >> >> interface FastEthernet0/1 >> ip address 192.1.34.3 255.255.255.0 >> duplex auto >> speed auto >> mpls label protocol ldp >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:20:41 -0700 > From: Steve Di Bias <[email protected]> > To: isaac mukhwana <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] MPLS ISSUE > Message-ID: > <cap_shuarzm+++t9ukddhxwkfqhaenu25_puvse4wlfp+cje...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > What is your LDP router-id? Run "show mpls ldp discovery" you should see > tx/rx if it's good and how you the RID too. > > R2(config-if)#do sh mpls ldp dis > Local LDP Identifier: > 192.1.23.3:0 > Discovery Sources: > Interfaces: > FastEthernet0/0 (ldp): xmit/recv > LDP Id: 192.1.23.2:0 > > I just pasted your config into my routers and the LDP peering came right up > on directly connected link > > *Mar 1 00:02:02.947: %LDP-5-NBRCHG: LDP Neighbor 192.1.23.2:0 (1) is U > > R2(config-if)#do sh mpls ldp ne > Peer LDP Ident: 192.1.23.2:0; Local LDP Ident 192.1.23.3:0 > TCP connection: 192.1.23.2.646 - 192.1.23.3.46807 > State: Oper; Msgs sent/rcvd: 5/5; Downstream > Up time: 00:00:55 > LDP discovery sources: > FastEthernet0/0, Src IP addr: 192.1.23.2 > Addresses bound to peer LDP Ident: > 192.1.23.2 > > Make sure you have directly connected neighbor, and if you're using > loopback make sure it's reachable from your peer router as well > > Thanks, > Steve Di Bias- CCIE #32840 > > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 9:30 AM, isaac mukhwana <[email protected]> wrote: > >> WITH ROUTER 2 AND ROUTER 3 DIRECTLY CONNECTED ON THEIR FA0/0 PHYSICAL >> INTERFACES, I CANNOT GET THEM TO FORM LDP NEIGHBORS, SHOW MPLS LDP >> NEIGHBOR COMMAND LISTS NO NEIGHBOR. >> AM I MISSING SOMETHING HERE?? >> ROUTER 2 >> >> mpls label range 200 299 >> mpls label protocol ldp >> >> >> interface FastEthernet0/0 >> ip address 192.1.23.2 255.255.255.0 >> duplex auto >> speed auto >> mpls label protocol ldp >> mpls ip >> ! >> >> interface FastEthernet0/1 >> ip address 192.1.12.2 255.255.255.0 >> duplex auto >> speed auto >> mpls label protocol ldp >> mpls ip >> >> ROUTER 3 >> >> mpls label range 300 399 >> mpls label protocol ldp >> ! >> interface FastEthernet0/0 >> ip address 192.1.23.3 255.255.255.0 >> duplex auto >> speed auto >> mpls label protocol ldp >> mpls ip >> ! >> >> interface FastEthernet0/1 >> ip address 192.1.34.3 255.255.255.0 >> duplex auto >> speed auto >> mpls label protocol ldp >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:24:17 +0300 > From: Ryan Krcelic <[email protected]> > To: isaac mukhwana <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] MPLS ISSUE > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Did you enable MPLS globally with the MPLS ip in global config mode? > > Respectfully, > > Ryan Krcelic > CCIE #38087 > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Jun 19, 2013, at 7:30 PM, isaac mukhwana <[email protected]> wrote: > >> WITH ROUTER 2 AND ROUTER 3 DIRECTLY CONNECTED ON THEIR FA0/0 PHYSICAL >> INTERFACES, I CANNOT GET THEM TO FORM LDP NEIGHBORS, SHOW MPLS LDP >> NEIGHBOR COMMAND LISTS NO NEIGHBOR. >> AM I MISSING SOMETHING HERE?? >> ROUTER 2 >> >> mpls label range 200 299 >> mpls label protocol ldp >> >> >> interface FastEthernet0/0 >> ip address 192.1.23.2 255.255.255.0 >> duplex auto >> speed auto >> mpls label protocol ldp >> mpls ip >> ! >> >> interface FastEthernet0/1 >> ip address 192.1.12.2 255.255.255.0 >> duplex auto >> speed auto >> mpls label protocol ldp >> mpls ip >> >> ROUTER 3 >> >> mpls label range 300 399 >> mpls label protocol ldp >> ! >> interface FastEthernet0/0 >> ip address 192.1.23.3 255.255.255.0 >> duplex auto >> speed auto >> mpls label protocol ldp >> mpls ip >> ! >> >> interface FastEthernet0/1 >> ip address 192.1.34.3 255.255.255.0 >> duplex auto >> speed auto >> mpls label protocol ldp >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:00:08 -0400 > From: Nick Bonifacio <[email protected]> > To: Ryan Krcelic <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, isaac > mukhwana <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] MPLS ISSUE > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Hi Ryan, > > It worked for me exactly as you have it.. > > Note: cef was on by default, my interfaces were already up/up, and I pinged > across just to be safe. Also, I have nothing in the LFIB (show mpls for), > and I am not _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
