it is tony since the FA address is set. review the FA address requirement for 
non-zero field. it is under the router ospf process on router R6.


________________________________________
From: Tony Singh [[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 3:27 PM
To: Elie Raad
Cc: Marko Milivojevic; OSL Routing and Switching
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] OSPF Q

Elie is the 3.3.65.5 address in the global rib, if it isn't then the LSA won't 
be considered for installation into the global rib from my testing...

--
BR

Tony

Sent from my iPad

On 20 Jun 2013, at 08:23, Elie Raad <[email protected]> wrote:

> R4#sh ip ospf data external 5.5.5.5
>
>            OSPF Router with ID (4.4.4.4) (Process ID 1)
>
>                Type-5 AS External Link States
>
>  Routing Bit Set on this LSA
>  LS age: 767
>  Options: (No TOS-capability, DC)
>  LS Type: AS External Link
>  Link State ID: 5.5.5.5 (External Network Number )
>  Advertising Router: 1.1.1.1
>  LS Seq Number: 80000002
>  Checksum: 0xE0A6
>  Length: 36
>  Network Mask: /32
>        Metric Type: 2 (Larger than any link state path)
>        TOS: 0
>        Metric: 20
>        Forward Address: 0.0.0.0
>        External Route Tag: 0
>
>  Routing Bit Set on this LSA
>  LS age: 340
>  Options: (No TOS-capability, DC)
>  LS Type: AS External Link
>  Link State ID: 5.5.5.5 (External Network Number )
>  Advertising Router: 6.6.6.6
>  LS Seq Number: 80000002
>  Checksum: 0x2601
>  Length: 36
>  Network Mask: /32
>        Metric Type: 2 (Larger than any link state path)
>        TOS: 0
>        Metric: 20
>        Forward Address: 3.3.65.5
>        External Route Tag: 0
> traceroute 5.5.5.5 nu
>  1 3.3.24.2 88 msec
>    3.3.34.3 68 msec
>    3.3.24.2 28 msec
>  2 3.3.36.6 68 msec
>    3.3.12.1 92 msec
>    3.3.36.6 64 msec
> The result is that OSPF is not using the FA address  in this case even it is 
> set
>
> this is  what i meant :)
>
>
> R1 and R6 are ASBR
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Marko Milivojevic [[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 7:09 PM
> To: Elie Raad
> Cc: Saleh Batouq; OSL Routing and Switching
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] OSPF Q
>
> Well, you are mixing in two things here :-). The thread was originally about 
> the non-NSSA area. That's what I was answering about.
>
> In a case of the NSSA area, behavior is slightly different. NSSA ASBR will 
> set FA as the IP field to one of its own IP addresses advertised in OSPF 
> (preference given to Loopback). When the translating ABR creates Type 5 LSA, 
> this information will be preserved, allowing fo the optimal routing to the 
> ASBR.
>
> --
> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
> Senior CCIE Instructor / Managing Partner - IPexpert
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Elie Raad 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> I mean in scenario where we have 2 Exits to O E1/E2 routes , OSPF will choose 
> to Replace the Advertising Router Attribute to the highest Router-id Value 
> between Both . in that case OSPF will route toward the one that is matched 
> inside the Advertising router value, this can cause sometimes sub-optimal 
> routing issue.
> If the Forwarding Address value is set than OSPF will route toward the Fa 
> address field regardless of the one who did the T 7/5 Translation ensuring 
> Optimal path selection.
>
> what if this same route has been advertised but now with the Advertising 
> router field set and the Fa field Set. and there is no Type 7/5 Translation 
> since we Satisfied the below conditions for setting the FA to non-zero. the 
> question is what will OSPF choose as a next hope to get this route 
> installated in the RIB?
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Elie Raad | Network and Systems Administrator
> American University of Science and Technology
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> | Office: +961-1-218716 Ext: 396
> Office Hours: Mon- Fri 9:00 am-16:00 pm UTC+02:00
> ________________________________
> From: Marko Milivojevic [[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 11:27 PM
> To: Elie Raad
> Cc: Saleh Batouq; OSL Routing and Switching
>
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] OSPF Q
>
> What would OSPF use as next-hop where?
>
> --
> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
> Senior CCIE Instructor / Managing Partner - IPexpert
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Elie Raad 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> What will ospf use as a next hop , the advertising router ip address or the 
> fa address
>
> Ignore any typos, sent from mobile device.
>
> On Jun 18, 2013, at 19:17, "Marko Milivojevic" 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>
> Yes it is :-)
>
> On an ASBR that redistributes the route:
>
> 1) next-hop must be known by OSPF (enabled on the interface, or a more 
> specific OSPF route to it)
> 2) exit interface for the next-hop must not be passive
> 3) exit interface must be broadcast or non-broadcast
>
> If those are satisfied, redistributed route will have non-zero FA and FA will 
> be the next-hop of the redistributed route.
>
> --
> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
> Senior CCIE Instructor / Managing Partner - IPexpert
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Saleh Batouq 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> I would also like to know!!!
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Saleh
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Elie Raad 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>> Hi Guys ,
>>
>> is it possible to set the FA Address to non-zero for an O E1/E2 route?
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com>
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com<http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com>
>>
>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com>
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com<http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com>
>
> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs


_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs

Reply via email to