What should be a simple access-list question. Why is it that some access-lists will show the number of hits and some won't? I have yet to see a pattern.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:00 AM, <[email protected]>wrote: > Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Version 5.0 Update (Bill Riley) > 2. Re: Version 5.0 Update (Bob McCouch) > 3. CCNP-to-CCIE Transition Kit; Route Lab 2; Task 7.6; > ([email protected]) > 4. Re: Version 5.0 Update ([email protected]) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 11:01:05 -0500 > From: Bill Riley <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Version 5.0 Update > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Any rumor from Cisco Live on a version update? > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 12:46:57 -0400 > From: Bob McCouch <[email protected]> > To: Bill Riley <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Version 5.0 Update > Message-ID: <-3737896519547143256@unknownmsgid> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > I wasn't at the techtorials, but word is no blueprint change was > announced. Still v4. > > Bob > -- > Sent from my iPhone, please excuse any typos. > > On Jun 24, 2013, at 12:46 PM, Bill Riley <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Any rumor from Cisco Live on a version update? > > _______________________________________________ > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > please visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 10:00:53 -0500 > From: [email protected] > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCNP-to-CCIE Transition Kit; Route Lab 2; > Task 7.6; > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > CCNP-to-CCIE Transition Kit; Route Lab 2; Task 7.6; Problem reaching > external "ISP" networks on R9 via R2,R4,&R5. I can reach them from R6. > Everything works as it should. Accourding to the DSG, I am only looking > to see if the default 0.0.0.0/0 route is in the table. It does not test > reach ability, and neither does the task say to test reach ability and > that it should be working. I'd imagine I would want to get out of the > network, or what's the point? > > Starting on R9; > R9#sh run | sec router bgp > router bgp 65001 > neighbor 173.16.121.6 default-originate > > Then R6; > > R6#sh ip bgp > BGP table version is 11, local router ID is 173.16.121.6 > Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path > *> 0.0.0.0 170.70.255.9 0 0 65001 i > *> 170.70.0.0/21 170.70.255.9 0 0 65001 i > *> 173.16.100.0/22 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i > *> 173.16.104.0/21 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i > *> 173.16.112.0/21 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i > *> 173.16.120.0/22 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i > R6#sh ip route > Gateway of last resort is 170.70.255.9 to network 0.0.0.0 > B* 0.0.0.0/0 [20/0] via 170.70.255.9, 00:08:31 > R6# > R6(config)#router ospf 65101 > R6(config-router)#default-information originate > R6(config-router)#end > R6# > > Then I check R5; > R5#clear ip route * > R5#sh ip route 0.0.0.0 > Routing entry for 0.0.0.0/0, supernet > Known via "ospf 65101", distance 110, metric 1, candidate default > path > Tag 65101, type extern 2, forward metric 64 > Last update from 160.171.90.3 on Serial0/0/0, 00:00:02 ago > Routing Descriptor Blocks: > * 160.171.90.3, from 173.16.121.6, 00:00:02 ago, via Serial0/0/0 > Route metric is 1, traffic share count is 1 > Route tag 65101 > > R5#ping 170.70.255.9 > > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 170.70.255.9, timeout is 2 seconds: > ... > Success rate is 0 percent (0/3) > R5#ping 160.171.90.38 > > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 160.171.90.38, timeout is 2 seconds: > !!!!! > Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 4/4/4 ms > R5#ping 160.171.90.37 > > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 160.171.90.37, timeout is 2 seconds: > ..... > Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) > > > I can reach the ExtraNet office over the frame relay link from the > small office and big office. I just can't reach the R9 networks from > ExtraNet switches, Small & Big office. The following shows reachability > from R6 to R9's networks; > > R6#tclsh > R6(tcl)#foreach address { > +>(tcl)#160.171.90.37 > +>(tcl)#160.171.90.41 > +>(tcl)#170.70.255.9 > +>(tcl)#170.70.0.1 > +>(tcl)#170.70.1.1 > +>(tcl)#170.70.2.1 > +>(tcl)#170.70.3.1 > +>(tcl)#170.70.4.1 > +>(tcl)#170.70.5.1 > +>(tcl)#170.70.6.1 > +>(tcl)#170.70.7.9 > +>(tcl)#} { ping $address } > > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 160.171.90.37, timeout is 2 seconds: > !!!!! > Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/3/4 ms > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 160.171.90.41, timeout is 2 seconds: > !!!!! > Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/2/4 ms > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 170.70.255.9, timeout is 2 seconds: > !!!!! > Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 4/4/4 ms > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 170.70.0.1, timeout is 2 seconds: > !!!!! > Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 4/4/4 ms > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 170.70.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds: > !!!!! > Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 4/4/5 ms > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 170.70.2.1, timeout is 2 seconds: > !!!!! > Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/3/8 ms > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 170.70.3.1, timeout is 2 seconds: > !!!!! > Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 4/4/4 ms > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 170.70.4.1, timeout is 2 seconds: > !!!!! > Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 4/4/5 ms > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 170.70.5.1, timeout is 2 seconds: > !!!!! > Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 4/4/4 ms > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 170.70.6.1, timeout is 2 seconds: > !!!!! > Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 4/4/4 ms > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 170.70.7.9, timeout is 2 seconds: > !!!!! > Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 4/4/4 ms > R6(tcl)#exit > > I checked my answers to the DSG, they look good. I even went as far as > to do exactly what the DSG did. And I still can't reach the networks > that are pingable above on R6 when doing the same on R2,R4,&R5. None of > the Cat switches can reach them either. I even tried to redistribute > using a prefix-list to only get the default route into OSPF from BGP; > > !-- on R6 > ip prefix-list DEFAULT_ROUTE seq 10 permit 0.0.0.0/0 > route-map PERMIT_DEFAULT_ROUTE permit 10 > match ip address prefix-list DEFAULT_ROUTE > exit > route-map PERMIT_DEFAULT_ROUTE deny 20 > router ospf 65101 > no default-information originate > redistribute bgp 65101 route-map PERMIT_DEFAULT_ROUTE subnets > > The default route 0.0.0.0 doesn't even show up on R2,R4,&R5. So I tried > the following; > > !-- on R6 > router bgp 65101 > neighbor 170.70.255.9 shutdown > exit > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 160.171.90.37 30 > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 160.171.90.41 30 > router ospf 65101 > redistribute static route-map PERMIT_DEFAULT_ROUTE subnets > exit > > again the default route does not show up R2,R4,&R5. any help would be > much appreciated (even knowing that it's not supposed to work would be > cool). > > -Joey > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 13:36:10 -0400 > From: [email protected] > To: Bob McCouch <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Version 5.0 Update > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > I went to the tech course on Sunday. The word is that v5.0 will be > announced later this calendar year. No dates were given and it was clear > that they don't have a date yet for the announcement or for the change. No > specifics were released directly about changes but several hints were > given. The test won't change much but frame relay will probably go away > and IPv6 will have a bigger role. That was about all they would tell us. > > Hope that helps. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Jun 24, 2013, at 12:46 PM, Bob McCouch <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I wasn't at the techtorials, but word is no blueprint change was > > announced. Still v4. > > > > Bob > > -- > > Sent from my iPhone, please excuse any typos. > > > > On Jun 24, 2013, at 12:46 PM, Bill Riley <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Any rumor from Cisco Live on a version update? > >> _______________________________________________ > >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > please visit www.ipexpert.com > >> > >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > >> > >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > > _______________________________________________ > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > please visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > > > End of CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 89, Issue 25 > *************************************** > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
