Hi guys,
I need a sanity check please :) - I am running into a strange problem and I
am trying figure out if this is a bug or am I missing something. I couldn't
find anything on the bug report for the version in question.
Trying to setup simple object tracking on my C3560 to track reachability for
a subnet. The behavior is different on different code, on 12.2(44)SE6 track
object fails with the route present in the routing table, on 12.2(55)SE4
track object works fine with no config changes on the switch.
Thanks
Max
Routing entry for 10.0.33.0/24
Known via "ospf 1", distance 110, metric 2, type intra area
Last update from 10.0.66.1 on Vlan66, 01:59:55 ago
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 10.0.66.1, from 10.1.1.1, 01:59:55 ago, via Vlan66
Route metric is 2, traffic share count is 1
Debug for: WS-C3560-48TS 12.2(44)SE6 C3560-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M
01:55:24: Track: 1 Adding ip route object
01:55:24: Track: Initialise
01:55:24: Track: Register
01:55:24: Track: 1 New IP route 10.0.33.0/24, no route, reachability Down
01:55:24: Track: Starting process
Debug for: WS-C3560-48TS 12.2(55)SE4 C3560-IPSERVICESK9-M
00:01:44: Track: 1 Adding ip route object
00:01:44: Track: Initialise
00:01:44: Track: Register
00:01:44: Track: 1 New IP route 10.0.33.0/24, no route->OSPF, reachability
Up
00:01:44: Track: Starting process
track config:
track 1 ip route 10.0.33.0 255.255.255.0 reachability
sh track for 12.2(55)SE4:
Track 1
IP route 150.1.7.0 255.255.255.0 reachability
Reachability is Down (no route)
1 change, last change 00:00:46
First-hop interface is unknown
_______________________________________________
Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::
iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
