9.11 is taken care of in 9.12 as we're summarizing with the requirement "all EIGRP speakers should have a single routing entry that allows then to ping all three loopbacks"
caveat is R8 still needs a specific to 172.29.18.0/24 for this use a leak-map i.e leaking a more specific in a under a summary key point is picking up things like this in reading the questions, also its not possible to combine the 200.x.x.x with the 172.29.x.x in a summary BR Tony On 7 March 2014 20:43, Tomek Tajchman <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > First of all I want to say hello to everyone as it's my first post. > > I've started more serious work recently aiming for the first lab attempt in > late September. Being foreingner I'm struggling sometimes to understand > questions correctly. > > In lab 9.23 we are asked to create summary for all loobacks of as 1001, and > solution includes all lo0 200.0.0.x routes. However, in task 9.11 three > additional loopbacks 172.29.x.x were created. > > Am I missing something in the question 9.23, what indicates that we do not > need to include these additional 172.29.x.x loobpacks? I'm a bit worried I > will have no clue on the real exam what to do. Is it kind of question one > can clarify with the proctor? > > Kind Regards, > Tomek. > _______________________________________________ > Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos :: > > iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc > _______________________________________________ Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos :: iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
