The only thing that sometimes scary me is..

If this routers receive some type of DoS....

--
Michel Perez
Skype: michelmbperez
[email protected]
http://br.linkedin.com/in/michelmbperez


2014-05-27 18:56 GMT-03:00 Bob McCouch <[email protected]>:

> You're fine. Here's data from a production 1941 I have running full tables
> against 2 ISPs:
>
> EXAMPLERT#show ver
> Cisco IOS Software, C1900 Software (C1900-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version
> 15.2(4)M5, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
> ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 15.0(1r)M16, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
>
> EXAMPLERT uptime is 29 weeks, 1 day, 1 hour, 19 minutes
> System returned to ROM by power-on
> System restarted at 15:30:10 EST Mon Nov 4 2013
> System image file is "flash0:c1900-universalk9-mz.SPA.152-4.M5.bin"
> Last reload type: Normal Reload
> Last reload reason: power-on
>
> Cisco CISCO1941/K9 (revision 1.0) with 1540064K/32768K bytes of memory.
> Processor board ID FGL1710267F
> 2 Gigabit Ethernet interfaces
> 1 terminal line
> 1 Virtual Private Network (VPN) Module
> DRAM configuration is 64 bits wide with parity disabled.
> 255K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
> 250880K bytes of ATA System CompactFlash 0 (Read/Write)
>
>
> EXAMPLERT#show bgp sum
> BGP router identifier 192.0.2.86, local AS number 99999
> BGP table version is 156905939, main routing table version 156905939
> 493792 network entries using 73081216 bytes of memory
> 796816 path entries using 50996224 bytes of memory
> 125165/76957 BGP path/bestpath attribute entries using 17022440 bytes of
> memory
> 111548 BGP AS-PATH entries using 3906496 bytes of memory
> 53 BGP community entries using 1272 bytes of memory
> 0 BGP route-map cache entries using 0 bytes of memory
> 85 BGP filter-list cache entries using 1360 bytes of memory
> BGP using 145009008 total bytes of memory
> BGP activity 5030767/4536967 prefixes, 47981574/47184758 paths, scan
> interval 60 secs
>
> Neighbor        V           AS MsgRcvd MsgSent   TblVer  InQ OutQ Up/Down
>  State/PfxRcd
> A.B.C.3       4       99999 24831954 53177412 156905939    0    0 29w0d
>  303107
> 192.0.2.85    4       12345  14099722  189456 156905766    0    0 8w4d
>   493708
> EXAMPLERT#show proc cpu his
>
> EXAMPLERT   05:52:06 PM Tuesday May 27 2014 EDT
>
>
>
>
>       3333                                                       3
>       555522222111111111166666111113333311111111111111111111111118
>   100
>    90
>    80
>    70
>    60
>    50
>    40 ****                                                       *
>    30 ****                                                       *
>    20 ****                                                       *
>    10 ****               *****                                   *
>      0....5....1....1....2....2....3....3....4....4....5....5....6
>                0    5    0    5    0    5    0    5    0    5    0
>                CPU% per second (last 60 seconds)
>
>
>
>
>       323222221222212222122221222212222222221713322122222222122221
>       851411112111161211311117111251111212116534111831111311611115
>   100
>    90
>    80                                        *
>    70                                        *
>    60                                        *
>    50                                        *
>    40 *                                      *
>    30 ***                                    * **
>    20 ******** ********* ********************* *******************
>    10 ***************************************#**************#*****
>      0....5....1....1....2....2....3....3....4....4....5....5....6
>                0    5    0    5    0    5    0    5    0    5    0
>                CPU% per minute (last 60 minutes)
>               * = maximum CPU%   # = average CPU%
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 775445444644556544344454444444444444444444454544444444544444444445566767
>
> 567621787587282193971410497327888444901589347389489043455066847752745797
>   100
>
>    90
>
>    80 **
> * *
>    70 **       *
>  ****
>    60 ***      *   **
> ******
>    50 **** ************  *  *  **  ****   *  *** ***** **   *** ***
> **********
>    40
> ************************************************************************
>    30
> ************************************************************************
>    20
> ************************************************************************
>    10
> ************************************************************************
>
>  0....5....1....1....2....2....3....3....4....4....5....5....6....6....7..
>                0    5    0    5    0    5    0    5    0    5    0    5
>  0
>                    CPU% per hour (last 72 hours)
>                   * = maximum CPU%   # = average CPU%
>
>
> EXAMPLERT#show mem
>                 Head    Total(b)     Used(b)     Free(b)   Lowest(b)
>  Largest(b)
> Processor   293BEE80   1422102912   515694856   906408056   900406788
> 842952540
>       I/O    E000000    33554432    17432604    16121828    15865264
>  13769932
>
>
>
> EXAMPLERT#show ip ro sum
> IP routing table name is default (0x0)
> IP routing table maximum-paths is 32
> Route Source    Networks    Subnets     Replicates  Overhead    Memory
> (bytes)
> connected       0           12          0           720         2160
> static          0           7           0           840         1260
> bgp 99999       164566      329227      0           29627580    88882740
>   External: 352814 Internal: 140979 Local: 0
> internal        5797                                            20287420
> Total           170363      329246      0           29629140    109173580
>
>
> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Ryan Jensen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> > I'm about to bring up peerings with two ISPs. Today, I have two peerings
> > with 1 ISP, only sending me 1 default route.
> > I'm dropping a circuit and bringing in another ISP circuit. I have a
> > requirement to load-balance across the two circuits, hence the need for
> > full tables. Let BGP do its thing and pick the best path to the
> > destination.
> >
> > Question:
> > I have a pair of 2921, one on each circuit, each with maxed 2.5gb Ram.
> > Am I crazy to think these routers will handle the full tables? My current
> > ISP just told me we're looking at just a bit over 490k routes.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::
> >
> > iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::
>
> iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
>
_______________________________________________
Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::

iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc

Reply via email to