Agreed, lady at San Jose was very nice and easy going!

Ayaz
On Nov 22, 2013 10:16 PM, "Fawad Khan" <fawa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Kevin,
> So many congrats man. I agree with all the words you said about Piotr,
> what a champ he is. Made the same difference in my life.
>
>
> Ayaz, I would prefer San Jose over RTP any time:). I passed there , that
> is one reason but the main reason was that the proctor at San Jose was a
> better person who at least listened to your concern and answered you in a
> better way. On the other hand RTP proctor (David) was unnecessarily
> tough(almost rude) guy. Who had no empathy to your very logical question.
>
> Regards
> Fawad Khan
> CCIE Security # 35578
>
> On Thursday, November 21, 2013, Kevin Sheahan wrote:
>
>> Thanks Ayaz,
>>
>>
>>
>> Regarding the differences between RTP and San Jose, there are no biggies.
>> The lab presentation is the same in both locations, you get a bit of a
>> longer lunch in San Jose but you have to walk a ways to the lunch area so
>> that’s why. You still have plenty of time to eat and/or think in both
>> locations. No differences that could impact your lab, though.
>>
>>
>>
>> Good luck!
>>
>>
>>
>> Kevin Sheahan
>>
>> CCIE # 41349 (Security)
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Ayaz Merchant [mailto:merchanta...@gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Thursday, November 21, 2013 11:09 AM
>> *To:* Kevin Sheahan
>> *Cc:* ccie_security@onlinestudylist.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] CCIE Sec Pass
>>
>>
>>
>> Kevin, A big congrats! You have given me some hope, after trying the lab
>> and seeing so many of my fellows fail, I was starting to doubt if v4 was
>> passable or not at this time. Now back to studying hard for me!!!
>>
>>
>>
>> Any thoughts on the difference in your lab experience between RTP and San
>> Jose?
>>
>>
>>
>> Ayaz
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Kevin Sheahan <sheaha...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Gents,
>>
>>
>>
>> It is with great pleasure that I can tell you I’ve passed my CCIE
>> Security Lab on Tuesday in RTP. It has been a very difficult year both
>> personally and professionally to prepare for this exam. This was my third
>> attempt. For study, I leaned very heavily on IPExpert’s
>> material/intructors/racks. Piotr Kaluzny – I can’t speak highly enough
>> about this guy – suffice it to say that if you are feeling lost, get his
>> attention and he will lead you in the right direction. His expertise,
>> patience, and all around cool-dudeness are sincerely appreciated and
>> valuable when you start to feel like you’re drowning in the blueprint. I
>> also used my own personal hardware and read A LOT of Cisco configuration
>> guides pertaining to blueprint (There are a lot of “Notes” in those config
>> guides that provide great info).
>>
>>
>>
>> Lessons learned:
>>
>>
>>
>> -        My strategy played a very large role in time management and
>> organization during the exam.
>>
>> o   Build a table to keep track of…. EVERYTHING:
>>
>> §  Obj | Points |  Desc  | V1 | V2 | Comments
>> 1.1         4       ASAMC    F                Unable to ping <subnet>,
>> check later
>> 1.2         5       IPS-IVP    P                Re-verify @ end, core
>> objective.
>>
>> §  I would create and fill out this table (first 3 columns) as I’m
>> reading through the lab at the beginning. The “Comments” section became
>> extremely useful for me to shorten the amount of end-lab verification
>> because instead of re-reading the objective for verification I would only
>> have to see what I wrote down from previous verification failures. Anything
>> with a “P” for pass in the V2 column should be money in the bank, ensure
>> that you’ve paid attention to the fine details in the objective which can
>> cause loss of points.
>>
>> o   Prep the lab:
>>
>> §  Pager 20 / Term length 20
>>
>> ·        This will allow you to execute long-output show commands later
>> in the day without the screen scrolling away from you. This should be done
>> on ALL devices.
>>
>> §  Logging
>>
>> ·        ASA
>>
>> o   Logging console warnings / Logging on – This will tell you
>> throughout your lab when your ASA is denying traffic due to ACL and/or NAT
>> failures. Very useful!
>>
>> ·        IOS
>>
>> o   Logging console – This will tell you when routing processes drop,
>> when ISAKMP is ON/OFF, etc. As well, this will allow for your debug output
>> to show up.
>>
>> §
>>
>>
>
> --
> FNK
>
_______________________________________________
Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::

iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc

Reply via email to