Great idea Thanks
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 7:53 AM, Jonathan Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Someone else replied, directly to me, said to put the full 10 digit as > a secondary on the ephone-dn > > > > Jonathan > > On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Paul and Bobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Thanks Jonathan > > > > Zone prefix is something I thought of but dont want to use. I thought > about > > assigning the full e164 number to the ephone-dns then doing a num-exp of > say > > 5... 12345... and have the label on the phone with 5XXX and the > description > > of 12345XXX. Sounds a bit confusing and long winded. I just know my luck > I > > will get asked to confgure CUE indialing and have the CUE dial through > GK to > > CCM which will hit this bug. Anyay such is life........ > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 10:20 PM, Jonathan Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Zone prefix will route the calls correctly. > > > > > > Or does that fall into 'any other method on the gatekeeper...' > > > > > > You could just assign the 10-digit numbers as the extensions. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jonathan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 1:04 AM, Paul and Bobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > Im struggling a bit with this diaplan in CME adn gatekeeper routing. > I > > am > > > > trying to get CUE working without using the dialplan configuration > but > > also > > > > have e164 calls route through the GK to the CME from CCM. I do not > want > > to > > > > use tech prefix or any other method on the gatekeeper. Is there any > > other > > > > way on CME to have the phones register with e164 numbers into the GK > > > > dialplan automatically or am I asking to much... > > > > > > > > > > > > Paul > > > > > > > > > > > >
