Yeah i thought so too since i had it working like that before. But for some reasons, it wasn't working for me a couple of days ago. Same configuration. I guess i'll try it again and see if it will work for me next time. Thanks. JD
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 14:11:13 -0500From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GK with Tech-PrefixCC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] you can route via GK with just using different tech prefixes WITHOUT using zone prefixes On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:31 PM, Devildoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, Perhaps too much studying has scrambled my brains, but i swear that in the past i have gotten gk to work correctly with just tech prefix alone and no zone prefix. So my question is this... can gk work correctly alone on just tech prefix? Or does the gk also need a zone prefix in addition to tech prefix? Tonight i tried to configure the gk with only tech prefix. Each gateway registered to the gk with a different tech prefix and the originating gateway sent the destination tech-prefix along with the destination route pattern to the destination gateway. I did not configure any default technology prefix nor did i configured any zone prefix. That did not work. I worked as soon as I added the zone prefix to the configuration. I though you don't need a zone prefix when configuring a tech prefix. And i swear i did that before and it worked fine but not tonight. Anyone has any thought on this? Thanks. JD Get in touch in an instant. Get Windows Live Messenger now.-- "There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't" _________________________________________________________________ More immediate than e-mail? Get instant access with Windows Live Messenger. http://www.windowslive.com/messenger/overview.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_Refresh_instantaccess_042008
