CCM 4.x SRND, Music on Hold --> Call Admission Control and MoH
Cisco Unified CallManager locations-based call admission control is capable of tracking unicast MoH streams traversing the WAN but not multicast MoH streams HTH On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 10:44 AM, ccievoice1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, > > If you read the MOH topic in CCM 4.x SRND, > > Multicast MOH won't "contribute" to your Location bandwidth. However, > Unicast MOH does. > > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 10:01 PM, FrogOnDSCP46EF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Christian, > > I think one stream (MOH) should consume what is configured in the > > srevice parameter under mediaapp. The case I depicted here is G729 region > > (hq to siteB). > > > > So... > > > > Back to the my original question, bandwidth consideration, 2xg729 calls > > vs 3 x G729 calls. > > > > If you set 3 calls, (considering 1xg729 for MOH), you may get "0" in HA > > section. > > > > > > Frog > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:32 PM, Christian Narvaez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > You can test it using Permon , and selecting the Performance Object > > > "Cisco Locations" then see how the BandwidthAvailable varies. > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of > > > FrogOnDSCP46EF > > > Sent: Wed 4/30/2008 5:45 AM > > > To: CCIE Voice Maillist > > > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCM : location based CAC MOH > > > bandwidthconsideration > > > > > > Folks, > > > > > > Allow 2 calls between HQ and SiteB , HQ to siteb are in G729 region. > > > > > > 2 calls = 24kbps per call x 2 = 48 kbps > > > > > > What about MOH bandwidth if HQ is pumping M.Cast MOH to SITEB? > > > > > > Think about when both calls are occupied and 48kbps bandwidth CAC is > > > exhausted and we also want to put someone on MOH? > > > How CCM maths work in that situation? > > > > > > Frog > > > > > > -- > > > Smile, you'll save someone else's day! > > > Frog > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Smile, you'll save someone else's day! > > Frog > > > >
