I don¹t think it would cost you- but....don¹t configure if not asked. Why? 9911 might interfere with other Route Patterns for example the local RP especially if the urgent priority checkbox is marked.
It probably won¹t, but it could bite you- so only configure what is being asked. Lose ³rules of thumb² configuration- you need to be very clever in understanding requirements with a high level of precision. -- Vik Malhi CCIE #13890 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Join our free online support and peer group communities: http://www.IPexpert.com/communities IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. From: James Key <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 08:37:26 -0600 To: <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Dial Plan Question If not explicitly told to account for users using an access code for emergency numbers, should you still go ahead and add a 9.911 RP anyways, and do you think it will count against you for doing it? I know it has been said that there is no penalty for over configuration, but just want to make sure that seems to be the case. James NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The message, together with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete all copies.
