No. Yes if use "match-any" instead of "match-all" ----- Original Message ----- From: "Shadab Abbasi (moabbasi)" To: "Preethi Thamina" , ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Marking traffic Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 20:20:58 +0530
YesÂ… From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Preethi Thamina Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 8:08 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Marking traffic Hi, Do the following 2 way of marking signalling accomplish the same thing? Option 1: class-map match-all SIG match protocol skinny match protocol sip match protocol h323 match protocol mgcp ! policy-map mark class SIG set ip dscp cs3 ====================== Option 2: ip access-list extended CONTROL permit tcp any range 2000 2002 any permit tcp any eq 2428 any permit udp any eq 2427 any permit tcp any any range 1718 1720 permit udp any any range 1718 1720 permit tcp any range 1718 1720 any permit udp any range 1718 1720 any permit udp any any eq 5060 permit tcp any any eq 5060 ! class-map match-all CONTROL match access-group name CONTROL ! policy-map MARK class CONTROL set ip dscp cs3 Thanks, -- Be Yourself @ mail.com! Choose From 200+ Email Addresses Get a Free Account at www.mail.com
