Nick,

First of all, best wishes for 2009

second, you`d might try to mount an iso for installation, or just use the
dvd ofcourse.
if this still fails, just try my scenario for creating the vm with w2k3 os,
and then install from a mounted iso in vm.
This must work, i have done this several times over.



On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Nick Kassel <nick.kas...@btinet.bt.com>wrote:

>  No I only have a copy of the files on a hard disc.
>
>  ------------------------------
>  *From:* Erik Goppel [mailto:egop...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 31 December 2008 11:13
>
> *To:* Nick Kassel
> *Cc:* Mark Holloway; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE VOICE HARDWARE
>
>   did you use the original uccx install dvd?
>
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Nick Kassel 
> <nick.kas...@btinet.bt.com>wrote:
>
>>  Hi Erik
>>
>> No I didn't, I installed W2K3 separately and copied the registry settings
>> from another UCCX server, I then installed the OS upgrade 2003.1.3b.sr3,
>> it's just that when I run the setup.exe I don't even get to the point where
>> it does trhe hardware check, it just flashes up the command box and that
>> message. If I run the setup for UCCX 5 it seems to run ok, so I'm pretty
>> sure the OS install is ok.
>>
>> Nick
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>>  *From:* Erik Goppel [mailto:egop...@gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* 31 December 2008 09:24
>> *To:* Nick Kassel
>> *Cc:* Mark Holloway; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE VOICE HARDWARE
>>
>>   Nick,
>>
>> did you create the OS image the way i explained?
>> If so, make sure that when powered on for installation of uccx, that yo
>> allocatie 2 Gigs during the install, as soon as the install is finished, you
>> can decrease the amount of mem, however be aware that uccx is still mem
>> intensive, so if possible keep it at 2 gigs minimum.
>> I have installed uccx7 several times now this way, and have had no issues
>> at all.
>>
>> Erik
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Nick Kassel 
>> <nick.kas...@btinet.bt.com>wrote:
>>
>>>  I'm having a little trouble running the setup.exe of UCCX7, when I run
>>> it I get a command box that says , 'Program too big for memory', I
>>> believe this may be because the files are corrupt or that's what a google
>>> search has led me to, I can run the setup fine for version 5.
>>>
>>>  ------------------------------
>>> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
>>> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Erik Goppel
>>> *Sent:* 23 December 2008 11:47
>>> *To:* Mark Holloway
>>> *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>>>  *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE VOICE HARDWARE
>>>
>>>   Steven,
>>>
>>>
>>> There is a very easy way to make the 2k3 os work in vmware. You have to
>>> install the os on a real MCS-server first, this is important.
>>> As soon as you have done that, you can use vmware converter (it is free)
>>>  to make it virtual.
>>> As soon as you have virtualized the server, and you start it up in
>>> vmware, it will give you a message that you need to activate the OS license.
>>> This because the hardware has been changed to much, activate the server
>>> with the key provided on the OS disk you received.
>>> Reboot the server, and you are all fine.
>>> i have done this about 20+ times, and no problems whatsoever.
>>> Even if you have an AMD proc for your VMware machine, this will give you
>>> no problems for UCCX7 , for UCM ofcourse it will.
>>>
>>>
>>> Good luck,
>>>
>>>
>>> Erik
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 5:51 AM, Mark Holloway <m...@markholloway.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>>  It's true.  UCM7 will not install on AMD machines running VMWare.
>>>> Someone I spoke with at Cisco said it was not intentional to prevent
>>>> installing UCM7 on AMD when running VMWare.   Perhaps the 7.01 ES release 
>>>> on
>>>> CCO fixes this?  If not, I'm sure a new version is coming.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
>>>> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Chris Kagadis (
>>>> kagadis.com)
>>>> *Sent:* Monday, December 22, 2008 6:20 PM
>>>> *To:* Erik Goppel
>>>> *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; Sunny Sharma
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE VOICE HARDWARE
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Quick question; Are your servers on Vmware with Intel or AMD?  I tried
>>>> installing this weekend on AMD and had problems.  I read a post that said
>>>> that CUCM (at least) can not currently be installed on WMware/AMD.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:57 AM, Erik Goppel <egop...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Sunny,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Besides the HW (which is quite clear), look at building a good VMware
>>>> machine, and order the UC 7.0 NFR Kit, this includes all the 7.0 material
>>>> for the v3 blueprint.
>>>>
>>>> Currently i have the entire 7.0 launch running in vmware without any
>>>> problems, so you should be ok there.
>>>>
>>>> looking at the licenses provided with the NFR (or in VM moded), for CUCM
>>>> you will have 3 node licenses and 150 dlu`s, for presence you can run 2
>>>> nodes.
>>>>
>>>> UCCX 7.0 comes with a staggering 150 premium agent license, outbound and
>>>> basic email is included in premium.
>>>>
>>>> unity connection i am not sure, need to check that.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> grtz,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Erik
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 4:37 AM, Sunny Sharma <su...@sunnysharma.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> hi experts
>>>>
>>>> planning to build a ccie voice rack. need help in hardware setup as per
>>>> new V3 blueprint
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> thanks in advance
>>>> SS
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Chris Kagadis
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>> This message has been scanned for all viruses by BTnet VirusScreen.
>>> The service is delivered in partnership with MessageLabs.
>>> This service does not scan any password protected or encrypted
>>> attachments.
>>> ==============================================================
>>>
>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>> This message has been checked for all viruses by BTnet VirusScreen.
>>> The service is delivered in partnership with MessageLabs.
>>> This service does not scan any password protected or encrypted
>>> attachments.
>>> ==============================================================
>>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> This message has been scanned for all viruses by BTnet VirusScreen.
>> The service is delivered in partnership with MessageLabs.
>> This service does not scan any password protected or encrypted
>> attachments.
>> ==============================================================
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> This message has been checked for all viruses by BTnet VirusScreen.
>> The service is delivered in partnership with MessageLabs.
>> This service does not scan any password protected or encrypted
>> attachments.
>> ==============================================================
>>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> This message has been scanned for all viruses by BTnet VirusScreen.
> The service is delivered in partnership with MessageLabs.
> This service does not scan any password protected or encrypted
> attachments.
> ==============================================================
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> This message has been checked for all viruses by BTnet VirusScreen.
> The service is delivered in partnership with MessageLabs.
> This service does not scan any password protected or encrypted
> attachments.
> ==============================================================
>

Reply via email to